Skip to main content
Log in

Alfalfa forage yield and leaf/stem ratio: narrow-sense heritability, genetic correlation, and parent selection procedures

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forage yield, and forage quality as inferred by high leaf/stem ratio, are pivotal alfalfa breeding targets. However, information on narrow-sense heritability (\(h_{N}^{2}\)) and genetic correlation (r g ) of these traits is scant and mostly inferred from limited germplasm samples and trait observation. This study aimed at: (i) generating \(h_{N}^{2}\), r g and complementary information based on 125 parent genotypes representative of Italian germplasm evaluated as clones, half-sib progenies and selfed (S1) progenies for dry-matter yield over 12 harvests and leaf/stem ratio across two harvests; (ii) assessing the consistency of parent value across evaluation procedures; (iii) verifying leaf/stem ratio changes in two genetic bases selected for higher forage yield. Seeds per tripped flower of selfed parents ranged from 0.16 to 2.53, with high broad-sense heritability on a genotype mean basis (\(h_{B}^{2}\) = 0.81). Genotype cloning success across three experiments displayed moderate \(h_{B}^{2}\) (0.44). Forage yield exhibited large genetic variation but fairly modest \(h_{N}^{2}\) (0.21), whereas leaf/stem ratio featured high \(h_{N}^{2}\) (0.75). Inbreeding depression for yield averaged 39 %. Non-additive genetic effects were almost as large as additive ones for DM yield, and extremely low for leaf/stem ratio. Additive genetic effects had greater impact than inbreeding depression on parent yielding ability based on S1 progenies. Forage yield and leaf/stem ratio were independent according to genetic correlations for parent-offspring (r g  = −0.18) and half-sib progeny data (r g  = −0.33) and the lack of leaf/stem ratio change in material selected for higher yield. Forage yield can profit of genotypic selection, whereas phenotypic selection on large plant numbers is preferable for leaf/stem ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht KA, Wedin WF, Buxton DR (1987) Cell-wall composition and digestibility of alfalfa stems and leaves. Crop Sci 27:735–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P (2004) A low-cost procedure for multi-purpose, large-scale field evaluation of forage crop genetic resources. Euphytica 140:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P (2006) Diversity, genetic structure, distinctness and agronomic value of Italian lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) landraces. Euphytica 148:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P (2007a) Inter- and intra-population genetic variation for leaf: stem ratio in landraces and varieties of lucerne. Grass Forage Sci 62:100–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P (2007b) Wide- versus specific-adaptation strategy for lucerne breeding in northern Italy. Theor Appl Genet 114:647–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P, Piano E (2005) Use of artificial environments to reproduce and exploit genotype × location interaction for lucerne in northern Italy. Theor Appl Genet 110:219–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P, Pecetti L, Proietti S (2010a) Enhancing the adaptation to Italian environments of Egyptian lucerne germplasm for exploitation as a component of free-hybrids. In: Huyghe C (ed) Sustainable use of genetic diversity in forage and turf breeding. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 519–524

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P, Scotti C, Carelli M, Pecetti L (2010b) Questions and avenues for lucerne improvement. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 46:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P, Barrett B, Brummer EC, Julier B, Marshal AH (2015) Achievements and challenges in improving temperate perennial forage legumes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 34:327–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arolfo V, Odorizzi A, Basigalup D, Balzarini M (2011) Validación de un método de selección para rendimento en alfalfa basado en la depresión por endocría. Agriscientia 28:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauchan GR, Campbell TA, O’Neill NR, Elgin JH (1990) Self-incompatibility in two alfalfa populations. Crop Sci 30:1205–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker WA (1992) Manual of quantitative genetics, 5th edn. Academic Enterprises, Pullman

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham ET, Groose RW, Woodfield DR, Kidwell KK (1994) Complementary gene interactions in alfalfa are greater in autotetraploids than diploids. Crop Sci 34:823–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowley SR, Christie BR (1981) Inheritance of dry matter yield in a heterozygous population of alfalfa. Can J Plant Sci 61:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brummer EC (1999) Capturing heterosis in forage crop cultivar development. Crop Sci 39:943–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdon RD (1977) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet 26:168–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Busbice TH, Wilsie CP (1966) Inbreeding depression and heterosis in autotetraploids with application to Medicago sativa L. Euphytica 15:52–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Busbice TH, Hunt OJ, Elgin JH, Peaden RN (1974) Evaluation of the effectiveness of polycross- and self-progeny tests in increasing the yield of alfalfa synthetic varieties. Crop Sci 14:8–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casler MD, Brummer EC (2008) Theoretical expected genetic gains for among- and within- family selection methods in perennial forage crops. Crop Sci 48:890–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COPA-COGECA (2007) Lucerne: an asset to the environment. COPA-COGECA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Nahrawy MA, Bingham ET (1989) Performance of S1 alfalfa lines from original and improved populations. Crop Sci 29:920–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallais A (1984) An analysis of heterosis vs. inbreeding effects with an autotetraploid cross-fertilized plant: Medicago sativa L. Genetics 106:123–137

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guines F, Julier B, Ecalle C, Huyghe C (2002) Genetic control of quality traits of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Aust J Agric Res 53:401–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall MH, Smiles WS, Dickerson RA (2000) Morphological development of alfalfa cultivars selected for higher quality. Agron J 92:1077–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RR, Barnes RF (1977) Genetic variability for chemical composition of alfalfa. II. Yield and traits associated with digestibility. Crop Sci 17:948–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JB, Bingham ET (1994) Genetic improvement for yield and fertility of alfalfa cultivars representing different eras of breeding. Crop Sci 34:953–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe C (2003) Les fourrages et la production de protéines. Fourrages 174:145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Julier B, Huyghe C, Ecalle C (2000) Within- and among-cultivar genetic variation in alfalfa: forage quality, morphology, and yield. Crop Sci 40:365–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne O (1957) An introduction to genetic statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart KD, Buxton DR, Hill RR (1990) Digestibility and cell-wall components of alfalfa following selection for divergent herbage lignin concentration. Crop Sci 30:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbeng CA, Bingham ET (1998) Population improvement in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.): components of inbreeding depression are different in original and improved populations. Aust J Exp Agric 38:831–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb JFS, Sheaffer CC, Rhodes LH, Sulc RM, Undersander DJ, Brummer EC (2006) Five decades of alfalfa cultivar improvement: impact on forage yield, persistence, and nutritive value. Crop Sci 46:902–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire G, Allirand JM (1993) Relation entre croissance et qualité de la luzerne: interaction génotype-mode d’exploitation. Fourrages 134:183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Brummer EC (2012) Applied genetics and genomics in alfalfa breeding. Agronomy 2:40–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marten GC, Buxton, Barnes RF (1988) Feeding value (Forage quality). In: Hanson AA, Barnes DK, Hill RR (eds) Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement. ASA, CSSA & SSSA, Madison, pp 463–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Monirifar H (2011) Expected genetic gain for several quantitative traits in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Not Sci Biol 3:109–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Nizam Uddin M, Ellison FW, O’Brien L, Latter BDH (1994) The performance of pure lines derived from heterotic bread wheat hybrids. Aust J Agric Res 45:591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecetti L, Piano E (2005) Heritability of morphophysiological traits and inbreeding effects in grazing-type lucerne. Plant Breed 124:176–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho H-P, Möhring J (2011) On estimation of genotypic correlations and their standard errors by multivariate REML using the MIXED procedure of the SAS system. Crop Sci 51:2449–2454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehlman JM, Sleeper DA (1995) Breeding field crops, 4th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Posselt UK (2010) Breeding methods in cross-pollinated species. In: Boller B, Posselt UK, Veronesi F (eds) Fodder crops and amenity grasses. Handbook of plant breeding. Springer, New York, pp 39–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ray IM, Townsend MS, Muncy CM, Henning JA (1999) Heritabilities of water-use efficiency traits and correlations with agronomic traits in water-stressed alfalfa. Crop Sci 39:494–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riday H, Brummer EC (2005) Heterosis in a broad range of alfalfa germplasm. Crop Sci 45:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotili P (1976) Performance of diallel crosses and second generation synthetics of alfalfa derived from partly inbred parents. I. Forage yield. Crop Sci 16:247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotili P, Scotti C, Zannone L, Gnocchi G (1994) Lucerne stand system: dynamics of forage production, quality and demography: consequences on the variety constitution process. REUR Tech Ser 36:54–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh MD, Caddel JL, Rowe DE (1988) Breeding and quantitative genetics. In: Hanson AA, Barnes DK, Hill RR (eds) Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement. ASA, CSSA, SSSA Publishers, Madison, pp 777–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun P, Velde M, Gardner DB (2004). Alfalfa hybrids having at least 75% hybridity. US patent US6774280B2. www.google.com/patents/WO2002060238A2?cl=en

  • Tremblay GF, Bélanger G, McRae KB, Michaud R (2002) Leaf and stem dry matter digestibility and ruminal undegradable proteins of alfalfa cultivars. Can J Plant Sci 82:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi F, Lorenzetti F (1983) Productivity and survival of alfalfa hybrid and inbred plants under competitive conditions. Crop Sci 23:577–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viands DR, Sun P, Barnes DK (1988) Pollination control: mechanical and sterility. In: Hanson AA, Barnes DK, Hill RR (eds) Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement. ASA, CSSA, SSSA Publishers, Madison, pp 931–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Wricke G, Weber WE (1986) Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. W. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out within the projects ‘Germplasm collections’ and ‘Plant genetic resources/FAO Treaty’ funded by the Italian Ministry of Agricultural and Forestry Policies. I am grateful to Sandro Proietti for excellent technical assistance, and to Renata Guatteri, Katia Negri and Fiamma Rosi for their contribution to various stages of the experiment work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Annicchiarico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Annicchiarico, P. Alfalfa forage yield and leaf/stem ratio: narrow-sense heritability, genetic correlation, and parent selection procedures. Euphytica 205, 409–420 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1399-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1399-y

Keywords

Navigation