Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of artificial environments to reproduce and exploit genotype × location interaction for lucerne in northern Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genotype × environment interaction effects can be exploited by breeding for specific adaptation to well-defined subregions within a target region. Previous work showed that genotype × location interaction for dry matter (DM) yield of lucerne (Medicago sativa L. subsp. sativa) cultivars in northern Italy is large and associated with soil type and level of summer drought stress of locations, suggesting the presence of two contrasting subregions. Thirteen farm landraces collected across the region and four control varieties were evaluated for DM yield in four artificial environments created at one site by the factorial combination of soil type (sandy loam or silty clay) and drought stress level (almost nil or high) for: (1) exploring the possibility to reproduce in artificial environments the adaptation patterns occurring across the region; (2) investigating the adaptation pattern of landraces and its relationship with environmental factors at collecting sites; and (3) providing a preliminary comparison of wide- versus specific-adaptation strategies based on yield gains predicted from selection of populations. Different soils filled large (24.0×1.6×0.8-m deep), bottomless containers in concrete. Water amounts were controlled by irrigation under a moving rain shelter. Cultivars varied largely for adaptation pattern across the artificial environments, mainly due to cultivar × stress interaction. Better response to stress conditions of landraces was closely associated with the level of summer drought at collecting sites (r=0.82), highlighting the importance of evolutionary adaptation. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction-modelled responses of control cultivars successfully reproduced those observed across locations, candidating the artificial environments as a cheaper alternative to more selection locations when breeding for wide or specific adaptation. The latter implied about 40–50% greater estimated gains relative to breeding for wide adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annicchiarico P (1992) Cultivar adaptation and recommendation from alfalfa trials in northern Italy. J Genet Breed 46:269–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P (1997) Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of genotype-location interaction in variety trials repeated over years. Theor Appl Genet 94:1072–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P (2000) Variety × location interaction and its implications on breeding of lucerne: a case study. In: Veronesi F, Rosellini D (eds) Lucerne and medics for the XXI century. University of Perugia, Perugia, pp 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P (2002a) Genotype × environment interactions: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO plant production protection paper 174. FAO, Rome

  • Annicchiarico P (2002b) Defining adaptation strategies and yield stability targets in breeding programmes. In: Kang MS (ed) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CABI, Wallingford, pp 365–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P, Mariani G (1996) Prediction of adaptability and yield stability of durum wheat genotypes from yield response in normal and artificially drought-stressed conditions. Field Crops Res 46:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basford KE, Cooper M (1998) Genotype × environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia. Aust J Agric Res 49:153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basford KE, Federer WT, DeLacy IH (2004) Mixed model formulation for multi-environment trials. Agron J 96:143–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramel-Cox PJ, Barker T, Zavala-Garcia F, Eastin JD (1991) Selection and testing environments for improved performance under reduced-input conditions. In: Sleper D, Bramel-Cox PJ, Barker T (eds) Plant breeding and sustainable agriculture: considerations for objectives and methods. CSSA Special Publication, vol 18. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, pp 29–56

  • Casler MD, Undersander DJ (2000) Forage yield precision, experimental design, and cultivar mean separation for alfalfa cultivar trials. Agron J 92:1064–1071

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S (1989). Wide adaptation: how wide? Euphytica 40:197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S (1996) Positive interpretation of genotype by environment interaction in relation to sustainability and biodiversity. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CABI, Wallingford, pp 467–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Impiglia A (1998) Choice of selection strategy in breeding barley for stress environments. Euphytica 103:307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, Woodruff DR, Eisemann RL, Brennan PS, DeLacy IH (1995) A selection strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield of wheat: managed-environments for selection among genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 90:492–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Monte G, Perini L, Brunetti A (1995) Indici agroclimatici. Ufficio Centrale Ecologia Agraria, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1990) Guidelines for soil profile description. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Federer WT, Scully BT (1993) A parsimonious statistical design and breeding procedure for evaluating and selecting desirable characteristics over environments. Theor Appl Genet 86:612–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer KS (1996) Research approaches for variable rainfed system. Thinking globally, acting locally. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CABI, Wallingford, pp 25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG (1992) Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1997) Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci 37:311–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Julier B (1996) Traditional seed maintenance and origins of the French lucerne landraces. Euphytica 92:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz P, Voltas J, Araus JL, Igartua E, Romagosa I (1998) Changes over time in the adaptation of barley releases in north-eastern Spain. Plant Breed 117:531–535

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oosterom EJ, Bidinger FR, Weltzien ER (2003) A yield architecture framework to explain adaptation of pearl millet to environmental stress. Field Crops Res 80:33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP (1995) Robustness of statistical tests for multiplicative terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Theor Appl Genet 90:438–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Russi L, Falcinelli M (1997) Characterization and agronomic value of Italian landraces of lucerne (Medicago sativa). J Agric Sci (Camb) 129:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1991) Selection for local adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Theor Appl Genet 82:363–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade LJ, McLaren CG, Samson BK, Regmi KR, Sarkarung S (1996) The importance of environmental characterization for understanding genotype by environment interactions. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CABI, Wallingford, pp 549–561

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge S. Proietti for excellent technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Annicchiarico.

Additional information

Communicated by H.C. Becker

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annicchiarico, P., Piano, E. Use of artificial environments to reproduce and exploit genotype × location interaction for lucerne in northern Italy. Theor Appl Genet 110, 219–227 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1811-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1811-9

Keywords

Navigation