Skip to main content
Log in

Linear Isotropic Relations in Finite Hyperelasticity: Some General Results

  • Published:
Journal of Elasticity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The form of the classical stress–strain relations of linear elasticity are considered here within the context of nonlinear elasticity. For both Cauchy and symmetric Piola-Kirchhoff stresses, conditions are obtained for the associated strain fields so that they are independent of the material constants and compatible with existence of a strain–energy function. These conditions can be integrated in both cases to obtain the most general strain field that satisfies these conditions and the corresponding strain–energy function is obtained. In both cases, a natural choice of form of solution is suggested by the special case of the compatibility conditions being satisfied identically. It will be shown that some strain–energy functions previously introduced in the literature are special cases of the results obtained here. Some recent linear stress–strain relations, proposed in the context of Cauchy elasticity, are examined to see if they are compatible with hyperelasticity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batra R.C.: Linear constitutive relations in isotropic finite elasticity. J. Elasticity 51, 243–245 (1998).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Batra R.C.: Comparison of results from four linear constitutive relations in isotropic finite elasticity. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 36, 421–432 (2001).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiskis A., Parnes R.: Linear stress–strain relations in nonlinear elasticity. Acta Mech. 146, 109–113 (2001).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Volokh K.Y.: Comments and authors’ reply on “Linear stress–strain relations in nonlinear elasticity” by A. Chiskis and R. Parnes. Acta Mech. 171, 241–245 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anand L.: On H. Hencky’s approximate strain–energy function for moderate deformations. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 46, 78–82 (1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Nader J.J.: Linear response in finite elasticity. J. Elasticity 73, 165–172 (2003).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartle R.G.: The Elements of Real Analysis. Wiley, New York (1976).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hencky H.: Über die form des Elastizitatsgesetzes bei ideal elastischen Stoffen. Z. Techn. Phys. 9, 215–220 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruhns O.T., Xiao H., Meyers A.: Hencky’s elasticity model with the logarithmic strain measure: a study on Poynting effect and stress response in torsion of tubes and rods. Arch. Mech. 52, 489–509 (2000).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruhns O.T., Xiao H., Meyers A.: Constitutive inequalities for an isotropic elastic strain–energy function based on Hencky’s logarithmic strain tensor. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457, 2207–2226 (2001).

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogden R.W.: Non-linear Elastic Deformations. Dover Publications, New York (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremiah G. Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, J.G. Linear Isotropic Relations in Finite Hyperelasticity: Some General Results. J Elasticity 86, 139–154 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-006-9088-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-006-9088-7

Key words

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000)

Navigation