Abstract
With our conceptualization of Harré and van Langenhove’s (1999) positioning theory, we draw attention to immanent experience and read transcendent discursive practices through the moment of interaction. We use a series of spatial images as metaphors to analyze the way positioning is conceptualized in current mathematics education literature and the way it may be alternatively conceptualized. This leads us to claim that changing the way mathematics is talked about and changing the stories (or myths) told about mathematics is necessary for efforts to change the way mathematics is done and the way it is taught.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For elaborated analysis of the positioning in the given transcript and its context, see Herbel-Eisenmann (2009).
References
Abbott, E. (1884). Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. London: Seeley.
Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ainley, J. (1988). Perceptions of teachers’ questioning styles. In A. Borbás (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. I (pp. 92–99). Hungary: Vezsprém.
Banks, C. A. M., & Banks, J. (1995). Equity pedagogy: an essential component of multicultural education. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 152–158.
Cabral, T., & Baldino, R. (2002). Lacanian psychoanalysis and pedagogical transfer: Affect and cognition. In A. Cockburn, & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 2 (pp. 169–176). UK: Norwich.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1993). Theoretical orientation. In T. Wood, P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & D. Dillon (Eds.), Rethinking elementary school mathematics: Insights and issues, monograph #6. Reston: NCTM.
Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. CPRE Research Report. Available at: http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/rr43.pdf.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). Ethnomathematics: Link between traditions and modernity. Sense: Rotterdam.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–51). Blackwell: Oxford.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
Evans, J. (2000). Adults mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.
Gates, P. (2006). Going beyond belief systems: exploring a model for the social influence on mathematics teacher beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 347–369. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-9007-z.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. doi:10.1177/0957926507069457.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Gresalfi, M., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(1), 49–57. doi:10.1207/s15544818ped0101_8.
Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the “voice” of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344–369.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Negotiation of the “presence of the text”: How might teachers’ language choices influence the positioning of the textbook? In J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. Lloyd. (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 134–151). Studies in Mathematical Thinking and Learning (A. Schoenfeld, Series Editor). New York: Routledge.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2007). A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics learner. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 8–14.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., & Cortes, V. (2008). Encoding authority: Pervasive lexical bundles in mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 30th Conference of PME-NA, Morelia, Mexico, vol. 3, pp. 153–160.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Juzwik, M. (2006). Situating narrative-minded research: a response to Anna Sfard’s and Anna Prusak’s ‘Telling identities’. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 13–21.
Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: a sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87–113.
Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing ‘good at maths’. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219.
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory and Practice, 31, 132–141.
Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 219–245.
Nasir, N., & Saxe, G. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: a cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14–18.
O’Connor, M., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–335.
O'Halloran, K. (2004). Discourses in secondary school mathematics classrooms according to social class and gender. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: functional approaches (pp. 191–225). New York: Continuum.
Rittenhouse, P. (1998). The teacher's role in mathematical conversation: Stepping in and stepping out. In M. Lampert, & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 13–57.
Sensevy, G., Schubauer-Leoni, M., Mercier, A., Ligozat, F., & Perrot, G. (2005). An attempt to model the teacher’s action in the mathematics class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 153–181.
Tholander, M., & Aronsson, K. (2003). Doing subteaching in school group work: positionings, resistance and participation frameworks. Language and Education, 17(3), 208–234.
van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré, & L. van Lagenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Blackwell: Oxford.
Wagner, D. (2007). Students’ critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 31–50.
Wagner, D. (2008). ‘Just go’: mathematics students' critical awareness of routine procedure. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(1), 35–48.
Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2008). ‘Just don’t:’ the suppression and invitation of dialogue in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 143–157.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Mathematics, social class, and linguistic capital: An analysis of mathematics classroom interactions. In B. Atweh, H. J. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.),Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 201–215). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Acknowledgments
We thank Richard Barwell for his feedback on an earlier draft of this article. The work was part of an NSF grant (#0347906) entitled “CAREER: Discourse analysis: A catalyst for reflective inquiry in mathematics classrooms” (Herbel-Eisenmann, PI), and an SSHRC grant entitled “Positioning and Authority in Mathematics Classrooms” (Wagner, PI). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF or SSHRC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, D., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning. Educ Stud Math 72, 1–15 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9178-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9178-5