Abstract
Mathematics is often considered an entirely cognitive activity pertaining to immaterial, ideal abstract forms. Plato argued that mathematical concepts are unchanging and eternal and exist in an ideal realm of pure being known to us through reason and reflection, while the physical world is the world of change and becoming known through the senses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting Mathematical Ideas: Middle School Video Cases to Support Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bochicchio, D., Cole, S., Ostein, D., Rodriguez, V., Staples, M., Susia, P., et al. (2009). Shared language. Mathematics Teacher, 102(8), 606–613.
Bogue, R. [1989] (2001). Deleuze & Guattari. Taylor and Francis elibrary. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/58238982/Deleuze-and-Guattari-Ronald-Bogue.
Bogue, R. (2009). Preface to multiple literacies theory. In D. Masny & D. Cole (Eds.), Multiple Literacies Theory: A Deleuzian Perspective. Boston: Sense Publishing.
Brunner, C., & Rhoades, T. (2010). Transversal fields of experience. Inflexions, 4(December). Retrieved from http://www.senselab.ca/inflexions/volume_4/n4_introhtml.html
Delanda, M. (2008). Deleuze, materialism and politics. In I. Buchanan & N. Thoburn (Eds.), Deleuze and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze, G. [1988] (1993). The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis, MN: Regents of University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. [1968] (1994). Difference and Repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. [1980] (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. [1991] (1994). What is Philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
de Freitas, E. (2012a). The classroom as rhizome: New strategies for diagramming knotted interaction. Qualitative Inquiry.
de Freitas, E. (2012b, July). The diagram as story: Unfolding the event-structure of the mathematical diagram. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2).
de Freitas, E. (2012c). What were you thinking? A Deleuzian/Guattarian analysis of communication in the mathematics classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: Theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 133–152.
de Freitas, E., & Zolkower, B. (2009). Using social semiotics to prepare mathematics teachers to teach for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 187–203.
Fello, S. E., & Paquette, K. R. (2009). Talking and writing in the classroom. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(7), 410–414.
Goodley, D. A. (2007). Becoming rhizomatic parents: Deleuze, Guattari and disabled babies. Disability and Society, 22(2), 145–160.
Gough, N. (2004). RhizomANTically becoming Cyborg: Performing posthuman pedagogies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 253–265.
Gough, N. (2005). Geophilosophy and methodology: Science education research in a rhizomatic space. In Methodologies for Researching Mathematics, Science and Technological Education an SocietiesaIn Transition. UNESCO—SAARSTE.
Gough, N. (2007). Changing planes: Rhizosemiotic play in transnational curriculum inquiry. Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 26, 279–294.
Guattari, F. [1989] (2008). The Three Ecologies (I. Pindar & P. Sutton, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
Hodge, L. L. (2009). Learning from students’ thinking. Mathematics Teacher, 102(8), 586–591.
Hughes, J. (2011). Believing in the World: Towards an ethics of form. In L. Guillaume & J. Hughes (Eds.), Deleuze and the Body (pp. 73–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kastberg, S. E., Norton, A., III, & Klerlein, J. T. (2009). Trusting students. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(7), 423–429.
Kleist, H. von. (2004). Selected Writings (D. Constantine, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Lecercle, J.-J. (2002). Deleuze and Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lynn, R. (2010). Communication speaks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle Grades, 17(1), 22–26.
Martin, J. R. (2007). Construing knowledge: A functional linguistic perspective. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives (pp. 34–64). Continuum International Publishing Group.
Massumi, B. (Ed.). (2002). A Shock to Thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari. New York: Routledge.
Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts. Cambridge, Mass: MIT press.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2007). A Multimodal Approach to Classroom Discourse. London: Equinox.
Rotman, B. (2000). Mathematics as Sign: Writing, Imagining, Counting. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, Education, and Becoming. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, D. (2005). Deleuze on Leibniz: Difference, continuity and the calculus. In S. H. Daniel (Ed.), Current Continental Theory and Modern Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Smith, D. (2006). Axiomatics and problematics as two modes of formalisation: Deleuze’s epistemology of mathematics. In S. Duffy (Ed.), Virtual Mathematics: The Logic of Difference (pp. 145–168). Clinamen Press.
Stockero, S. L., & Van Zoest, L. R. (2011). Making student thinking public. Mathematics Teacher, 104(9), 704–709.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language Proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). New York: Continuum.
Van Zoest, L., Stockero, S. L., & Kratky, J. (2010). Beginning mathematics teachers’ purposes for making student thinking public. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 37–52.
Veel, R. (1999). Language, knowledge, and authority in school mathematics. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness (pp. 185–216). London: Cassell.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Whitin, P., & Whitin, D. J. (2002). Promoting communication in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle Grades, 9(4), 205–210.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freitas, E.d. (2013). Mapping the Materiality of Classroom Discourse. In: Masny, D. (eds) Cartographies of Becoming in Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-170-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-170-2_10
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-170-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)
