Skip to main content
Log in

Managing Student Behavior with Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams: An Observational Study in Early Elementary Classrooms

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comprehensive evidence-based interventions are needed to help early childhood educators manage challenging student behaviors. One such intervention, class-wide function-related intervention teams (CW-FIT), is a multi-tiered behavioral intervention program based on positive behavior support principles, including four main elements: (a) teaching socially appropriate communication skills, (b) using differential reinforcement with an interdependent group contingency, (c) extinguishing or eliminating potential reinforcement for problem behavior, and (d) implementing individual interventions using self-management, help cards, and/or functional assessment. This study implemented CW-FIT with five kindergarten through second grade teachers. Results demonstrated efficacy of the program as early childhood teachers increased their praise rates and decreased their reprimand rates, and students responded with increased on-task behavior and fewer classroom disruptions. Study implications and limitations are addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. A. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91(3), 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrish, H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaman, R., Wheldall, K., & Kemp, C. (2007). Recent research on troublesome classroom behavior: A review. Australian Journal of Special Education, 6, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, E. A., Horner, R. H., & Squires, J. K. (2007). Assessment and implementation of positive behavior support in preschools. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27(3), 174–192. doi:10.1177/02711214070270030801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldarella, P., Christensen, L., Young, K. R., & Densley, C. (2011). Decreasing tardiness in elementary school students using teacher-written praise notes. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47(2), 104–112. doi:10.1177/1053451211414186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A. M. (2001). Positive behavioral supports: Information for educators (fact sheet). Retrieved from the National Association of School Psychologists website, http://www.nasponline.org/resources/factsheets/pbs_fs.aspx.

  • Conroy, M. A., & Brown, W. H. (2004). Early identification, prevention, and early intervention with young children at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders: Issues, trends, and a call for action. Behavioral Disorders, 29(3), 224–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, M. A., Davis, C. A., Fox, J. J., & Brown, W. H. (2002). Functional assessment of behavior and effective supports for young children with challenging behavior. Assessment for Effective Instruction, 27, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J. M., Vollmer, T. R., Krous, T., Downs, S., & Berard, K. P. (2011). An evaluation of the good behavior game in kindergarten classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(3), 605–609. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Caution: Praise can be dangerous. American Educator, 23(1), 4–9.

  • Egger, E. L., & Angold, A. (2006). Common emotional and behavioral disorders in preschool children: Presentation, nosology, and epidemiology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 313–337. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01618.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, E., Conroy, M., & Correa, V. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ use of specific praise statements with young children at risk for behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 34(3), 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, R. A., Hester, P. H., Rock, M. L., & Hughes, K. G. (2009). Back to basics: Rules, ignoring and reprimands revisited. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(4), 195–205. doi:10.1177/1053451208328831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system-rating scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.

  • Hulac, D., & Benson, N. (2010). The use of group contingencies for preventing and managing disruptive behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45(4), 257–262. doi:10.1177/1053451209353442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalis, T. M., Vannest, K. J., & Parker, R. (2007). Praise counts: Using self-monitoring to increase effective teaching practice. Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 20–27. doi:10.3200/PSFL.51.3.20-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamps, D., Wills, H. P., Heitzman-Powell, L., Laylin, J., Szoke, C., Petrillo, T., et al. (2011). Class-wide function-related intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(3), 154–167. doi:10.1177/1098300711398935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. G. (n.d.). Ask Dr. Katz archive: Question 13. Retrieved from http://illinoisearlylearning.org/ask-dr-katz/question013.htm.

  • Katz, L. G. (1993). Distinctions between self-esteem and narcissism: Implications for practice. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ED363452).

  • Kerr, M. M., & Nelson, C. M. (2006). Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classroom (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (2001). Five reasons to stop saying, “good job!”. Young Children, 56(5), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, S. M., & Barnett, D. W. (2013). Increasing preschool student engagement during group learning activities using a group contingency. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(3), 186–196. doi:10.1177/0271121413484595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, S., Hawkins, R. O., & Weber, D. (2011). Effects of a classwide interdependent group contingency designed to improve the behavior of an at-risk student. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(2), 103–116. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9125-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, M., Heath, M. A., & Miramontes, N. Y. (2012). Merging empiricism and humanism: Role of social validity in the school-wide positive behavior support model. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15(4), 221–230. doi:10.1177/1098300712459356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, K., Brown, J. A., & Borgmeier, C. J. (2008). Validity of functional behavior assessment within a response to intervention framework. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(1), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öneren Şendil, Ç., & Tantekin Erden, F. (2014). Peer preference: A way of evaluating social competence and behavioural well-being in early childhood. Early Child Development and Care, 184(2), 230–246, 1–17. doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.778254.

  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partin, T. C., Robertson, R. E., Maggin, D. M., Oliver, R. M., & Wehby, J. H. (2010). Using teacher praise and opportunities to respond to promote appropriate student behavior. Preventing School Failure, 54(3), 172–178. doi:10.1080/10459880903493179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., & Stormont, M. (2013). Classroom-level positive behavior supports in schools implementing SW-PBIS: Identifying areas for enhancement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15(1), 39–50. doi:10.1177/1098300712459079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, W. M., Stormont, M., Herman, K. C., Puri, R., & Goel, N. (2011). Supporting children’s mental health in schools: Teacher perceptions of needs, roles, and barriers. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 1–13. doi:10.1037/a0022714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, H. L., & Ross, S. M. (1989). Students’ time on learning tasks in special education. Exceptional Children, 55(6), 508–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. C., Lewis, T. J., & Stormont, M. (2011). The effectiveness of two universal behavioral supports for children with externalizing behavior in Head Start classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 133–143. doi:10.1177/1098300710379053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stormont, M., Lewis, T. J., & Smith, S. C. (2005). Behavior support strategies in early childhood settings: Teachers’ importance and feasibility ratings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(3), 131–139. doi:10.1177/10983007050070030201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stormont, M. A., Smith, S. C., & Lewis, T. J. (2007). Teacher implementation of precorrection and praise statements in Head Start classrooms as a component of a program-wide system of positive behavior support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 280–290. doi:10.1007/s10864-007-9040-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). The evolution of school discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, J. T., Wehby, J. H., & Ellis, D. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., & Gonen, O. (2011). Single-case research: Web-based calculators for SCR analysis, Version 1.0 (Web-based application). College Station, TX: Texas A & M University. Retrieved from www.singlecaseresearch.org.

  • Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., Epstein, M. H., & Sumi, W. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96. doi:10.1177/10634266060140010201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J. R., Bricker, D., et al. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194–209. doi:10.1177/106342669600400401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders: SSBD. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, H. P., Iwaszuk, W. M., Kamps, D., & Shumate, E. (2014). CW-FIT: Group contingency effects across the day. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(2), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, H. P., Kamps, D., Hansen, B. D., Conklin, C., Bellinger, S., Neaderhiser, J., et al. (2010). The classwide function-based intervention team program. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(3), 164–171. doi:10.1080/10459880903496230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A., & McCurdy, B. L. (2012). Class-wide positive behavior support and group contingencies: Examining a positive variation of the good behavior game. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(3), 173–180. doi:10.1177/1098300711421008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, S., & Morris, B. (2010). “Good job, you’re so smart”: The effects of inconsistency of praise type on young children’s motivation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(2), 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this article was supported by a grant from the Institute of Education Sciences and the U.S. Department of Education (R324A120344), awarded to the University of Kansas. The opinions presented in this article are those of the authors, and no endorsement by the agency is intended or implied.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Caldarella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caldarella, P., Williams, L., Hansen, B.D. et al. Managing Student Behavior with Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams: An Observational Study in Early Elementary Classrooms. Early Childhood Educ J 43, 357–365 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0664-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0664-3

Keywords

Navigation