Abstract
Genomics provides new opportunities for conservation genetics. Conservation genetics in livestock is based on estimating diversity by pedigree relatedness and managing diversity by choosing those animals that maximize genetic diversity. Animals can be chosen as parents for the next generation, as donors of material to a gene bank, or as breeds for targeting conservation efforts. Genomics provides opportunities to estimate diversity for specific parts of the genome, such as neutral and adaptive diversity and genetic diversity underlying specific traits. This enables us to choose candidates for conservation based on specific genetic diversity (e.g. diversity of traits or adaptive diversity) or to monitor the loss of diversity without conservation. In wild animals direct genetic management, by choosing candidates for conservation as in livestock, is generally not practiced. With dense marker maps opportunities exist for monitoring relatedness and genetic diversity in wild populations, thus enabling a more active management of diversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allendorf FW, Hard JJ (2009) Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9987–9994
CBD (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity
Chakraborty R, Moreau L, Dekkers JCM (2002) A method to optimize selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci. Genet Sel Evol 34:145–170
De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME (2008) Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 179:1503–1512
Eding H, Meuwissen THE (2001) Marker-based estimates of between and within population kinships for the conservation of genetic diversity. J Anim Breed Genet 118:141–159
Eding H, Crooijmans R, Groenen MAM, Meuwissen THE (2002) Assessing the contribution of breeds to genetic diversity in conservation schemes. Genet Sel Evol 34:613–633
Fabuel E, Barragan C, Silio L, Rodriguez MC, Toro MA (2004) Analysis of genetic diversity and conservation priorities in Iberian pigs based on microsatellite markers. Heredity 93:104–113
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Group, Essex, UK
FAO (2007a) Global plan of action for animal genetic resources and the Interlaken declaration. FAO, Rome, Italy
FAO (2007b) The state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome, Italy
Fernandez J, Roughsedge T, Woolliams JA, Villanueva B (2006) Optimization of the sampling strategy for establishing a gene bank: storing PrP alleles following a scrapie eradication plan as a case study. Anim Sci 82:813–821
Gibbs RA, Taylor JF, Van Tassell CP et al (2009) Genome-Wide Survey of SNP Variation Uncovers the Genetic Structure of Cattle Breeds. Science 324:528–532
Gilligan DM, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2005) Comparative losses of quantitative and molecular genetic variation in finite populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res 85:47–55
Goddard ME, Hayes BJ (2007) Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet 124:323–330
Green RD (2009) ASAS Centennial Paper: future needs in animal breeding and genetics. J Anim Sci 87:793–800
Hospital F (2001) Size of donor chromosome segments surrounding introgressions and the reduction of linkage drag in marker-assisted backcross programs. Genetics 158:1363–1379
Kammenga JE, Herman MA, Ouborg NJ, Johnson L, Breitling R (2007) Microarray challenges in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 22:273–279
Karlsson EK, Baranowska I, Wade CM et al (2007) Efficient mapping of Mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association. Nat Genet 39:1321–1328
Kristensen TN, Pedersen KS, Vermeulen CJ, Loeschcke V (2010) Research on inbreeding in the ‘omic’ era. Trends Ecol Evol (in press)
Lenstra JA (2006) Marker-assisted conservation of European cattle breeds: an evaluation. Anim Genet 37:475–481
MacEachern S, Hayes B, McEwan J, Goddard M (2009) An examination of positive selection and changing effective population size in Angus and Holstein cattle populations (Bos taurus) using a high density SNP genotyping platform and the contribution of ancient polymorphism to genomic diversity in Domestic cattle. BMC Genomics 10:181
Megens HJ, Crooijmans R, Cristobal MS, Hui X, Li N, Groenen MAM (2008) Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication. Genet Sel Evol 40:103–128
Meuwissen THE (1997) Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 75:934–940
Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829
Meuwissen THE, Karlsen A, Lien S, Olsaker I, Goddard ME (2002) Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus for twinning rate using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. Genetics 161:373–379
Mucha S, Windig JJ (2009) Effects of incomplete pedigree on genetic management of the Dutch Landrace goat. J Anim Breed Genet 126:250–256
Oliehoek PA, Windig J, Arendonk JAM, Bijma P (2006) Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs. Genetics 173:483–496
Pedersen LD, Sørencen AC, Berg P (2009) The number of genes underlying a trait under selection affects the rates of expected and true inbreeding more than their distribution over the genome recovery. In: Book of abstracts of the 60th annual meeting of the European association for animal production. Wageningen Academic, Wageningen, p 319
Peter C, Bruford M, Perez T, Dalamitra S, Hewitt G, Erhardt G (2007) Genetic diversity and subdivision of 57 European and Middle-Eastern sheep breeds. Anim Genet 38:37–44
Prayaga KC (2007) Genetic options to replace dehorning in beef cattle—a review. Aust J Agric Res 58:1–8
Rauw WM, Kanis E, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Grommers FJ (1998) Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livest Prod Sci 56:15–33
Salih H, Adelson DL (2009) QTL global meta-analysis: are trait determining genes clustered? BMC Genomics 10:184
Slate J, Gratten J, Beraldi D, Stapley J, Hale M, Pemberton JM (2009) Gene mapping in the wild with SNPs: guidelines and future directions. Genetica 136:97–107
Taberlet P, Valentini A, Rezaei HR, Naderi S, Pompanon F, Negrini R, Ajmone-Marsan P (2008) Are cattle, sheep, and goats endangered species? Mol Ecol 17:275–284
Toro MA (2006) Assessing genetic diversity between breeds for conservation. J Anim Breed Genet 123:289
Windig JJ, Kaal L (2008) An effective rotational mating scheme for inbreeding reduction in captive populations illustrated by the rare sheep breed Kempisch Heideschaap. Animal 2:1733–1741
Windig JJ, Meuleman H, Kaal L (2007) Selection for scrapie resistance and simultaneous restriction of inbreeding in the rare sheep breed “Mergellander”. Prev Vet Med 78:161–171
Wong GKS, Liu B, Wang J et al (2004) A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 432:717–722
Acknowledgements
Sipke Joost Hiemstra provided comments on an earlier version. This study was financially supported by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food (Programme KB-04-002-021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Windig, J.J., Engelsma, K.A. Perspectives of genomics for genetic conservation of livestock. Conserv Genet 11, 635–641 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0007-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0007-x