Abstract
Birefringence measurements of aqueous cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) suspensions are reported. Seven suspensions with concentrations between 0.7 and 1.3% per weight are sheared in a Taylor-Couette type setting and characterized using a birefringent measurement technique based on linear polarized light and acquisition with a polarization camera. Steady state measurements with shear rates up to 31 1/s show extinction angles of 23°–40° and birefringence in the order of 1e–5. The findings demonstrate the utility of CNC suspensions for flow birefringence studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Birefringent fluids are composed of optically anisotropic particles (colloidals) or macromolecules (polymers) (Merzkirch 2018). At rest, these particles or macromolecules are randomly orientated by Brownian motion and the fluid appears optically isotropic. When under the effect of shear, the particles align in a preferential direction and the fluid becomes birefringent. This phenomenon is also known as flow birefringence and has been studied ever since it was first described by Maxwell (1874). Flow birefringence and birefringent fluids are of interest for two reasons: the study of particles, macromolecules or polymer chains (Cerf and Scheraga 1952; Fuller 1995; Janeschitz-Kriegl 1983; Wayland 1964); and the visualization and study of flows and shear rates (Pih 1980). Macromolecular stretching and orientation as well as particle alignment lead to birefringence and influence the rheology. Birefringence is therefore linked to the rheological behavior and researchers have studied this relation. Several birefringent fluids have been researched. For example, the macromolecules of Xanthan gum solutions have been studied by means of flow birefringence (Chow and Fuller 1984; Meyer et al. 1993; Smyth et al. 1995; Yevlampieva et al. 1999). Flow-induced birefringence measurements have also been linked to the stress in the material by the so-called stress-optical rule (Fuller 1995; Janeschitz-Kriegl 1983). If this rule applies, birefringence is linearly proportional to the principal stress difference. Researchers apply the stress-optical rule to study the rheo-optical and structural behavior of fluids (Calabrese et al. 2021b; Ober et al. 2011).
Many flow visualization studies use Milling Yellow (Durelli and Norgard 1972; Peebles et al. 1964; Rankin et al. 1989; Schneider 2013; Sun et al. 1999), an industrial dye and a test fluid for simulating blood flows (Schmitz and Merzkirch 1984). Other fluids have also been successfully investigated (Funfschilling and Li 2001; Hu et al. 2009; Mackley and Hassell 2011; Martyn et al. 2000; Tomlinson et al. 2006).
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are currently attracting much attention, and several potential applications are being explored and discussed (Habibi et al. 2010; Lagerwall et al. 2014). CNCs are rod-like particles and have birefringent optical properties (Parker et al. 2018). Aqueous cellulose suspensions have been reported to be birefringent when the crystals are aligned magnetically (Frka-Petesic et al. 2015), electrically (Bordel et al. 2006) or mechanically (Calabrese et al. 2021b; Chowdhury et al. 2017; Ebeling et al. 1999; Hausmann et al. 2018). In this study, velocity gradients in laminar flows cause mechanical alignment. Flow birefringence has been used to study the birefringence relaxation of CNCs (Tanaka et al. 2019). The complex strain-optical coefficient was measured experimentally using a custom-built apparatus for oscillatory flow birefringence measurements (Tanaka et al. 2018) and was compared to theoretical values, for which the CNCs dimensions were measured by transmission electron microscopy. They concluded that birefringence relaxation is well-described by the theory for rigid rods and that flow birefringence is an efficient tool to determine the length distribution function of the CNCs. It was also noted that birefringence relaxation is less sensitive to internal motions such as tension and bending than to rotational motions.
In general, a birefringent fluid is characterized by two properties (Pindera and Krishnamurthy 1978). The first is the relationship between shear rate \(\dot{\gamma }\) and the magnitude of birefringence, expressed as \(\Delta n\,(\dot{\gamma })\), where \(\Delta n\) is the difference between the main refractive indices \(n_{1}\) and \(n_{2}\). If we define \(n_{1}\) as the refractive index associated with the fast axis, meaning \(n_{1} < n_{2}\), this gives \(\Delta n = n_{2} - n_{1}\). The second property refers to the orientation of the refractive index axes and is commonly described by the extinction angle \(\chi (\dot{\gamma })\). In order to measure optical properties, various polarized light imaging techniques have been proposed. Common experimental techniques use specially designed flow channels (Calabrese et al. 2021a), plate-plate geometries (Hausmann et al. 2018; Mykhaylyk et al. 2016) or Taylor-Couette type settings (Cerf and Scheraga 1952). The advantage of the latter is the straightforward identification of the extinction angle in the annular gap between the concentric cylinders. If two crossed linear polarizers are utilized in a Taylor-Couette type setting, one in front of the birefringent fluid and the other behind, an isoclinic cross appears, marking the orientation of the refractive index axes. The extinction angle is defined as the smaller of the two angles between the isoclinic cross and the linear polarizers. Possible values range between 0° and 45°.
If the refractive index of an ellipsoidal particle along the symmetry axis differs from the indices along the semi-axes, the optical response of one particle is similar to that of a uniaxial crystal with an extraordinary and an ordinary refractive index, \(n_{e}\) and \(n_{0}\), respectively. A uniaxial crystal is said to be positive if \(n_{e} > n_{o}\) and negative if \(n_{e} < n_{o}\). For rod-like CNC particles, studies have reported \(n_{e} > n_{o}\) (Frka-Petesic et al. 2015; Iyer et al. 1968; Klemm et al. 1998), making them optically positive. Peterlin (1938) and Peterlin and Stuart (1939a, 1939b) (in German) presented a three-dimensional distribution function of rigid rotational ellipsoidal particles in a laminar flow with a constant velocity gradient. Part of that theory was evaluated numerically (Cressely et al. 1985; Nakagaki and Heller 1975; Scheraga et al. 1951). Peterlin and Stuart (1939a, 1939b) applied the hydrodynamic equations of motion based on the work by Jeffery (1922) and added a rotational diffusion coefficient \(D_{r}\) to model the effect of Brownian motion. They showed that the extinction angle is a result of the distribution function and argue that the fluid behaves like a biaxial crystal. If the ellipsoidal particles are aligned electrically or magnetically, the fluid behaves like a uniaxial crystal with the optical axis in the direction of alignment. In a flow with a constant velocity gradient (gradient perpendicular to the flow direction), the particles align in a preferential direction within the flow plane but the in-plane alignment distribution is different to the out-of-plane distribution, resulting in the biaxial crystal behavior (three different main refractive indices). Peterlin and Stuart (1939a, 1939b) did not take particle–particle interactions into account. Therefore, their theoretical findings are limited. However, their conclusion that a sheared fluid behaves like a biaxial crystal due to the three-dimensional distribution function is thought to be transferable. Due to the symmetric setting here, one main refractive index axis is perpendicular to the flow plane.
A single rod-like particle in a fluid flow with constant velocity gradient is primarily oriented as indicated in Fig. 1 (Calabrese et al. 2021a; Cerf and Scheraga 1952; Mykhaylyk et al. 2016). The relation between alignment and rotational diffusion is described by the Péclet number \(Pe = {{\dot{\gamma }} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{\gamma }} {D_{r} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {D_{r} }}\). Rotational diffusion is dominant when \(Pe < 1\) whereas the velocity gradient dominates when \(Pe > 1\). For \(Pe \approx 1\), the rods start to align in a preferential orientation, causing the onset of shear thinning and birefringence. At small velocity gradients (\(Pe \approx 1\)) the preferred orientation of the rods is x = 45° due to the hydrodynamic tensile and compression forces, which are at an angle of 45° to the direction of flow. With higher velocity gradients (\(Pe \gg 1\)), the longitudinal axis of the rods is increasingly parallel to the direction of flow, leading to \(\chi \to 0^\circ\) (Scheraga et al. 1951). For optically positive, rod-like particles, the extinction angle lies between the direction of flow and the slow refractive index axis \(n_{2}\) (\(n_{2} > n_{1}\)). This is because of the larger extraordinary optical index of the longitudinal axis of the particles \(n_{e} > n_{o}\).
The intention of this study is to present streaming birefringence measurements of CNC water suspensions. Utilizing a Taylor-Couette type setting, the optical properties \(\Delta n\,(\dot{\gamma })\) and \(\chi (\dot{\gamma })\) are determined as functions of the shear rate. The results are of interest for two reasons. First, they help characterizing aqueous CNC suspensions and are therefore of interest to researchers studying the suspension physics. Second, the measurements indicate that these types of birefringent fluids can be used to visualize and study fluid flows and could present an alternative to current birefringent fluids.
Materials and methods
Material
Aqueous CNC suspensions were prepared by dispersing CelluForce NCC® powder (CelluForce Inc., www.celluforce.com) in distilled water. Jakubek et al. (2018) measured the average length and width of CelluForce CNC (spray dried) by transmission electron microscopy (87 nm, 7.4 nm; axial ratio ∼11; longest reported length ∼250 nm) and atomic force microscopy (77 nm, 3.5 nm; axial ratio ∼22, longest reported length ∼200 nm). Bertsch et al. (2018) also use atomic force microscopy and arrive at similar results (79 nm, 4.8 nm; axial ratio ∼16; longest reported length ∼400 nm). Seven suspensions with different concentrations (weight percentage, wt%) CNC were studied: 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 wt%. The mixtures were allowed one week to settle before the experiments so that the nanocrystals could disperse homogeneously. The distilled water had a conductivity of < 0.07 \({{\mu S} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\mu S} {cm}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {cm}}\) and the error in concentration is estimated to be \(\Delta c = \pm 0.03wt\%\).
Experimental setup
The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. It is the same apparatus as documented in Lane et al. (2021) with only small modifications. Unpolarized light from a halogen bulb (150 W EKE) is emitted through a 600 nm bandpass filter (600FS10-50 from Andover Corporation, HBW 10 nm). The light is then polarized by a linear polarizer (extinction ratio 10,000:1). The polarized light is collimated and redirected by a mirror upwards through a Taylor-Couette flow cell. The linear polarizer was placed in such a way that the light is fully p-polarized (electric field in the plane of incidence on the mirror). The Taylor-Couette experiment consists of a feedback-controlled DC motor with a tachometer and a 415:1 reduction gear rotating the inner cylinder at a selected angular velocity \(\Omega\), two glass windows at top and bottom enabling optical access and an outer cylinder sealing the setup. The height of the inner cylinder is 25 mm and the radius \(r_{inner} = 48mm\). The inner radius of the outer cylinder is \(r_{outer} = 49.5mm\), resulting in a gap width of 1.5 mm. The shear rate in a Taylor-Couette flow can be derived from (Davey 1962) and is given as
We approximate the close to constant shear rate with the shear rate in the middle of the gap \(\dot{\gamma }(r_{middle} )\), where \(r_{middle} = {{(r_{inner} + r_{outer} )} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{(r_{inner} + r_{outer} )} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}\). The relative difference between inner and outer shear rate is
With this design, shear rates between 0–31 1/s were tested. A monochrome polarization camera (Lucid Vision Labs Phoenix PHX050S-P, Nikon Nikkor 35–70 mm 1:3.3–4.5, applied f-number: f/3.3) placed above the setup measured the optical response. The default gain setting was used, and the exposure time was set to ensure a dynamic range of about 70%. The camera was not calibrated, as measurement errors are estimated to remain below 4% for this setting (Lane et al. 2022).
Using a linear polarizer has the advantage that phase differences up to \(\pi\) radians can be measured. However, only the relative positions of the refractive index axes can be determined, and no distinction between fast axis and slow axis is possible.
Optical characterization
The polarization camera used in this study is a division-of-focal-plane polarimeter that features small polarizers on every pixel. The polarizers have the directions 0°, 45°, 90°, 135° and vary in a regular pattern. The measured light intensities passing the corresponding polarizers are referred to as \(I_{0} ,I_{45} ,I_{90} ,I_{135}\). These intensities give the first three of the four Stokes parameters,
A polarization camera is therefore able to measure the Stokes parameters in (3) with a single snapshot. If light is only partially polarized, meaning that the light is composed of a polarized part and an unpolarized part, the fully polarized part can be expressed with the help of the degree of polarization (\(DOP \le 1\)). Applying the DOP and normalizing the Stokes parameters by \(S_{0}\) results in two normalized expressions for the fully polarized part of the light (Chipman 1995):
The DOP in the experiments was typically between 90 and 95%. By linking Stokes parameters to the birefringent properties of the flow, it is possible to optically characterize the fluid. The suspension is sheared due to the rotating inner cylinder and therefore becomes birefringent. The axis \(n_{2}\) is located at an angle \(\alpha\), and the extinction angle \(\chi\) describes the relative position between axis \(n_{2}\) and flow direction. The situation is schematically shown in Fig. 3. The drawing outlines the relation between extinction angle \(\chi\), angular coordinate \(\phi\) and absolute position \(\alpha\) of the slow axis \(n_{2}\):
The Mueller matrix in Lane et al. (2021) relates \(\chi\) to the fast axis, which would be \(n_{1}\) in our case. However, as the method cannot distinguish between fast and slow axis, we relate \(\chi\) directly to \(n_{2}\), the correct reference axis. To make sure that this axis is the slower axis, we used a circular polarizer and analyzed the results following the theory described by Onuma and Otani (2014). This approach distinguishes fast and slow axis but can only measure phase differences up to \({\pi \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\pi 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}\) radians. The measurements were not used to quantify the optical properties but to determine the position of the fast and slow refractive index axes. The measurements confirmed that fast and slow axis are indeed located as indicated in Fig. 3. (It is worth mentioning that the mirror reverses the direction of circular polarization. Left-handed circularly polarized light is therefore right-handed circularly polarized after reflection. Also, if right-handed circular polarized light undergoes a phase shift of \(\pi\), it is left-handed circular polarized and the equations require a proper adaptation). The relationship between phase differences \(\delta\) and difference of the refractive indices is given as:
Here, \(\lambda\) is the wavelength of the light (600 nm) and \(L\) the optical path length, equalling the height of the inner rotating cylinder (25 mm).
We use the measurement technique described in a previous study (Lane et al. 2021) to characterize the birefringent fluid. At each position \(\phi\), the polarization camera records the intensities \(I_{0} (\phi ),I_{45} (\phi ),I_{90} (\phi ),I_{135} (\phi )\). The degree of polarization for each location is estimated when the fluid is at rest, hence not being birefringent:
With Eqs. (3) and (7), the normalized expressions in Eq. (4) can be measured at every position \(\phi\), giving \(S_{{1_{N,P} }} (\phi )\) and \(S_{{2_{N,P} }} (\phi )\). If we assume that the birefringent fluid can be approximated as a linear retarder with \(\delta\) being the phase difference and \(\alpha\) the position of an axis, theoretical expressions for the normalized Stokes parameters \(S_{{1_{N,P} }}\) and \(S_{{2_{N,P} }}\) are obtained by applying Mueller calculus. If the linear polarizer in Fig. 2 is in line and hence parallel to the \(I_{0}\) direction of the polarization camera, the normalized Stokes parameters resulting from Mueller calculus are:
Measuring \(S_{{1_{N,P} }} (\phi )\) and \(S_{{2_{N,P} }} (\phi )\) as functions of the angular coordinate and fitting Eq. (8) to the measured distributions gives estimates for the extinction angle \(\chi\) and the phase difference \(\delta\). The distributions in Eq. (8) are periodic with period \({\pi \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\pi 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}\) in \(\chi\) and therefore the resulting extinction angle remains in the range between [0°, 90°]. For this reason, the distributions in Eq. (8) cannot distinguish between fast and slow axis. The results for the phase difference \(\delta\) using Eq. (8) are within the range [0,\(\pi\)]. Figure 4a, b show sample measurements of the Stokes parameters as function of the polar coordinate \(\phi\) and the correspondingly fitted distributions. In total, 200 measurement points with \(\phi\) varying between [− 3°, 154°] were analyzed. From the fits, parameters \(\chi\) and \(\delta\) are determined. Without any further information, it cannot be determined if the result for \(\delta\) is within the range [0,\(\pi\)] or within [\(\pi\),\(2\pi\)]. At the beginning of a measurement, the fluid is at rest and no birefringence occurs, corresponding to \(\delta = 0\). If the shear rate is increased by small enough steps, the measured phase differences that lie between [0,\(\pi\)] can be unwrapped to higher intervals. For example, the measurements \([0,{\pi \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\pi 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2},\pi ,{\pi \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\pi {2,}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {2,}}0,{\pi \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\pi 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2},\pi ]\) correspond to \([0,{\pi \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\pi 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2},\pi ,{{3\pi } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{3\pi } 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2},2\pi ,{{5\pi } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{5\pi } {2,3\pi }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {2,3\pi }}]\). With the unwrapping procedure, birefringence of multiple order retardance can be determined. This can be seen in Fig. 4c where the measured phase differences \(\delta\) are expanded to higher values. The measurement error resulting from the fitting procedure is discussed by Lane et al. (2021). For phase differences close to \(\delta = 0,2\pi ,...\), the measurement error for the extinction angle \(\chi\) is high. This becomes obvious when comparing Fig. 4a, b. The accuracy of the \(\chi\) measurements for the periodic distributions in Fig. 4a is significantly larger compared to the distributions shown in Fig. 4b. The reason for this is found in Eq. (8), indicating that the amplitude of the distributions is directly linked to the phase difference \(\delta\). If \(\delta\) is below a certain limit, we therefore neglect the corresponding \(\chi\) measurement. In this study, a limit of \(\delta \ge {\pi \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\pi 4}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 4}\) was chosen for which the measured extinction angles \(\chi\) are considered valid. Finally, we would like to note that the fitting of \(\delta\) appeared more robust compared to the fitting of \(\chi\). Many measurement points showed a strong discontinuity for \(\chi\) at \(\delta = 0,2\pi ,...\). The CNC suspensions are strongly birefringent and we assume that an unwanted re-alignment of the fluid at the top and bottom surfaces of the cylinder gap disturbs the measurements of \(\chi\). The optical influence of the unwanted alignment seems minimal in areas where the gap is parallel or perpendicular to the linear polarization of the incident light. Therefore, the presented measurements of \(\chi\) were obtained by only considering the 20 measurement points for which \(\phi\) is within [− 3°, 5°] or [86°, 94°]. For \(\delta\) however, all 200 measurement points were used, as depicted in Fig. 4.
Experimental procedure
Fifty different shear rates between 0 and 31 1/s were studied. Figure 4 shows the result for the suspension with 1.3 wt%. The first measurement was done at rest. After each stepwise increase, the shear rate was kept steady for five seconds before recording ten images and averaging them. From the mean image the corresponding parameters \(\delta ,\chi\) were derived. Phase differences were sorted following the procedure depicted in Fig. 4 (c). The relationship between birefringence \(\Delta n\), shear rate \(\dot{\gamma }\), and mass fraction \(w = {{w_{CNC} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{w_{CNC} } {w_{total} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {w_{total} }}\) is modeled as:
Results and discussion
Measurement results for the extinction angle \(\chi\) are shown in Fig. 5a and are given in Table 1 in the appendix. All measurements that are considered valid (compare Fig. 4 for the distinction between valid and non-valid measurements) are within 23–40°. Increasing the shear rate tends to decrease the extinction angle, which is in line with common theory as discussed in the introduction. For all suspensions most of the decrease can be seen between 0 and 5 1/s. After 5 1/s, the extinction angle decreases rather slowly. We explain outliers such as the 35° measurement for 1.0 wt% at a shear rate of 24.9 1/s with measurement limitations and its uncertainties. Birefringence measurements \(\Delta n\) are shown in Fig. 5b–d. The values can be looked up in Table 2 in the appendix. It is important to note that measurement errors of \(\delta\) are high for phase differences close to \(\delta = 0,\pi ,2\pi\) (Lane et al. 2021). The non-zero values at zero shear rate in Table 2 are therefore thought to result from measurement inaccuracies. Equation (9) was fitted to the measurements and the result is plotted for comparison. The determined parameters are A = 0.1070 s, n = 0.537 and m = 2.445, giving a root-mean-square-error of 9e–7. Figure 5d shows the measurements and the fit in a base-10 logarithmic scale for the shear rates. We can see that the fit is working particularly well for the 1.1 wt% and 1.3 wt% suspension. Increasing the shear rate generally increases birefringence. The increase in birefringence per shear rate decreases for higher shear rates as the slope decreases. A rather sharp increase at low shear rates and a levelling off at higher velocity gradients has been similarly found for Xanthan gum solutions (Chow and Fuller 1984; Lane et al. 2021). Birefringence of Milling Yellow suspensions has been reported to be proportional to the shear rate at low shear rates but also shows a levelling off at higher shear rates (Peebles et al. 1964). The studied CNC suspensions display birefringence of magnitude 1e-5 and are in the same order as Xanthan gum (Lane et al. 2021) and Milling Yellow (Peebles et al. 1964). Hence CNC suspensions appear as an attractive alternative for flow visualization studies due to their stability, ease of preparation and low cost.
The critical concentration for interparticle interactions of aqueous CNC is reported to be 0.5 wt% and the critical volume fraction for the isotropic cholesteric phase transition is at about 3–4 wt% (Bertsch et al. 2019). Below a concentration of 0.5 wt%, CNCs are assumed to be isotropically oriented. Above 0.5 wt%, cholesteric tactoids are formed. The suspensions in this study are above 0.5 wt% and we hence expect interparticle interactions.
It was stated in the introduction that the relation between shear alignment and rotational diffusion is described by the Péclet number \(Pe = {{\dot{\gamma }} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{\gamma }} {D_{r} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {D_{r} }}\). The rotational diffusion coefficient \(D_{r}\) for interacting rods decreases with increasing rod concentration (Doi and Edwards 1978; Maguire et al. 1980; Teraoka and Hayakawa 1989). This is because the rotational motion of a rod is increasingly restricted by its neighbors (Tao et al. 2005). Therefore, the required shear rate for the onset of particle alignment decreases with increasing concentration. It can be seen in Fig. 5d that the birefringence data seems to shift to the left with increasing concentration, which is in line with the theory. Shafiei-Sabet et al. (2012) report rheology measurements of aqueous CNC suspensions. Their 1 wt% CNC suspension is thought to be comparable to the suspensions used in this study (CNC powder dispersed in distilled water; average length: 100 nm, average width: 7 nm). The steady-state shear viscosity measurements for the 1wt% suspension show a Newtonian plateau at low shear rates (\(< \,\, \sim 10^{ - 2} {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 s}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} s}\)), a shear thinning region at intermediate shear rates (\(\sim 10^{ - 2} {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 s}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} s}\,\, - \,\, \sim 10^{0} {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 s}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} s}\)); and a second plateau at higher shear rates. The onset of shear thinning is related to the onset of shear alignment (\(Pe \approx 1\)), and the shear rate corresponding to the onset of shear thinning can be taken as an estimate for the rotational diffusion coefficient (Corona et al. 2018). We therefore assume that all our measurements (except at zero shear rate) are taken in the shear aligned regime.
As expected, increasing the amount of CNC increases the birefringence response. Calabrese et al. (2021a) studied the birefringence of a 0.1 wt% CNC dispersion that had been similarly prepared (CNC purchased from CelluForce, diluted in deionized water). However, they purchased an aqueous dispersion (never-dried) from CelluForce whereas this study uses re-suspended CNC powder. The CNC dimensions reported by Calabrese et al. (2021a) are: average length 260 nm; average diameter 4.8 nm; aspect ratio ∼54; longest reported length ∼700 nm. Shear induced birefringence is reported to be \(\Delta n \approx 3 \cdot 10^{ - 6}\) (\(\dot{\gamma } \approx 100{{\,1} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\,1} s}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} s}\)) and \(\Delta n \approx 9 \cdot 10^{ - 6}\) (\(\dot{\gamma } \approx 400{{\,1} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\,1} s}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} s}\)). Compared to these values our birefringence results are much higher. This is plausible as we are using much higher CNC concentrations. For shear rates below 40 1/s the fluid from Calabrese et al. (2021a) is considered isotropic (\(\Delta n = 0\)). The onset of shear alignment and therefore equally the rotational diffusion (\(Pe \approx 1\)) is reported to be 40 1/s. The authors propose a proportionality of \(\Delta n\sim \dot{\gamma }^{0.9}\). The exponent 0.9 is significantly different to our result, 0.537. We consider several possible reasons for this difference. Calabrese et al. (2021a) are using a CNC suspension in the dilute regime and the relation between rotational diffusion coefficient \(D_{r0}\) (no particle interaction) and rod length is given as \(D_{r0} \sim l^{ - 3}\) (Doi and Edwards 1978). The suspensions in this study are thought to be above the dilute regime and hence particle interactions have to be considered. According to Maguire et al. (1980) the rotational diffusion coefficient for interacting rods is concentration and rod length dependent, giving \(D_{r} \sim c^{ - 2} l^{ - 9}\). Our different exponent could therefore be explained by a different particle interaction behavior due to the different concentrations and the shorter rod lengths. The morphological properties are dependent on the drying method (Peng et al. 2012) and this might also explain the difference.
Calabrese et al. (2021a) report that extensional forces, described by the extensional rate \(\dot{\varepsilon }\), are four times more effective in aligning CNCs than shear forces, stating \(\Delta n\sim \dot{\gamma }^{0.9} \sim (4 \cdot \dot{\varepsilon })^{0.9}\). As we only study shear forces in the Taylor-Couette flow this aspect has not been researched and it is not clear if the factor 4 is transferable to our suspensions.
Conclusion
The results presented in this study characterize the steady state birefringence response of aqueous CNC suspensions to shear, with concentrations between 0.7 and 1.3 wt%. The measurements show that the extinction angle decreases and birefringence increases with increasing shear rate. Measured birefringence is in the order of 1e–5, and a non-linear model has been fitted to the values with an accuracy estimated by a root-mean-square-error of 9e–7. The findings are in line with the theory on birefringent fluids and indicate that aqueous CNC suspensions could be used for flow birefringence studies.
References
Bertsch P, Diener M, Adamcik J, Scheuble N, Geue T, Mezzenga R, Fischer P (2018) Adsorption and interfacial layer structure of unmodified nanocrystalline cellulose at air/water interfaces. Langmuir 34:15195–15202. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03056
Bertsch P, Sánchez-Ferrer A, Bagnani M, Isabettini S, Kohlbrecher J, Mezzenga R, Fischer P (2019) Ion-induced formation of nanocrystalline cellulose colloidal glasses containing nematic domains. Langmuir 35:4117–4124. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00281
Bordel D, Putaux J-L, Heux L (2006) Orientation of native cellulose in an electric field. Langmuir 22:4899–4901. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0600402
Calabrese V, Haward SJ, Shen AQ (2021a) Effects of shearing and extensional flows on the alignment of colloidal rods. Macromolecules 54:4176–4185. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02155
Calabrese V, Varchanis S, Haward SJ, Tsamopoulos J, Shen AQ (2021b) Structure-property relationship of a soft colloidal glass in simple and mixed flows. J Colloid Interface Sci 601:454–466
Cerf R, Scheraga HA (1952) Flow birefringence in solutions of macromolecules. Chem Rev 51:185–261. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60159a001
Chipman RA (1995) Chapter 22-polarimetry. Handbook of optics, vol II. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 774–810
Chow AW, Fuller GG (1984) Response of moderately concentrated xanthan gum solutions to time-dependent flows using two-color flow birefringence. J Rheol 28:23–43. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.549767
Chowdhury RA, Peng SX, Youngblood J (2017) Improved order parameter (alignment) determination in cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) films by a simple optical birefringence method. Cellulose 24:1957–1970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1250-9
Corona PT, Ruocco N, Weigandt KM, Leal LG, Helgeson ME (2018) Probing flow-induced nanostructure of complex fluids in arbitrary 2D flows using a fluidic four-roll mill (FFoRM). Sci Rep 8:1–18
Cressely R, Hocquart R, Wydro T, Decruppe JP (1985) Numerical evaluation of extinction angle and birefringence in various directions as a function of velocity gradient. Rheol Acta 24:419–426
Davey A (1962) The growth of Taylor vortices in flow between rotating cylinders. J Fluid Mech 14:336–368
Doi M, Edwards SF (1978) Dynamics of rod-like macromolecules in concentrated solution. Part 2. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2(74):918–932
Durelli AJ, Norgard JS (1972) Experimental analysis of slow viscous flow using photoviscosity and bubbles. Exp Mech 12:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02330269
Ebeling T, Paillet M, Borsali R, Diat O, Dufresne A, Cavaille JY, Chanzy H (1999) Shear-induced orientation phenomena in suspensions of cellulose microcrystals, revealed by small angle X-ray scattering. Langmuir 15:6123–6126. https://doi.org/10.1021/la990046+
Frka-Petesic B, Sugiyama J, Kimura S, Chanzy H, Maret G (2015) Negative diamagnetic anisotropy and birefringence of cellulose nanocrystals. Macromolecules 48:8844–8857. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b02201
Fuller GG (1995) Optical rheometry of complex fluids. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Funfschilling D, Li HZ (2001) Flow of non-Newtonian fluids around bubbles: PIV measurements and birefringence visualisation. Chem Eng Sci 56:1137–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00332-8
Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900339w
Hausmann MK, Ruhs PA, Siqueira G, Läuger J, Libanori R, Zimmermann T, Studart AR (2018) Dynamics of cellulose nanocrystal alignment during 3D printing. ACS Nano 12:6926–6937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b02366
Hu DL, Goreau TJ, Bush JWM (2009) Flow visualization using tobacco mosaic virus. Exp Fluids 46:477–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0573-6
Iyer KK, Neelakantan P, Radhakrishnan T (1968) Birefringence of native cellulosic fibers. I. Untreated cotton and ramie. J Polym Sci Part A-2 6:1747–1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1968.160061005
Jakubek ZJ, Chen M, Couillard M, Leng T, Liu L, Zou S, Baxa U, Clogston JD, Hamad WY, Johnston LJ (2018) Characterization challenges for a cellulose nanocrystal reference material: dispersion and particle size distributions. J Nanopart Res 20:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4194-6
Janeschitz-Kriegl H (1983) Polymer melt rheology and flow birefringence. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Jeffery GB (1922) The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 102:161–179. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1922.0078
Klemm D, Philpp B, Heinze T, Heinze U, Wagenknecht W et al (1998) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry: fundamentals and analytical methods, vol 1. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim
Lagerwall JPF, Schütz C, Salajkova M, Noh J, Park JH, Scalia G, Bergström L (2014) Cellulose nanocrystal-based materials: from liquid crystal self-assembly and glass formation to multifunctional thin films. NPG Asia Mater 6:e80–e80. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2013.69
Lane C, Rode D, Rösgen T (2021) Optical characterization method for birefringent fluids using a polarization camera. Opt Lasers Eng 146:106724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106724
Lane C, Rode D, Rösgen T (2022) Calibration of a polarization image sensor and investigation of influencing factors. Appl Opt 61:C37–C45. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.437391
Mackley MR, Hassell DG (2011) The multipass rheometer a review. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 166:421–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.01.007
Maguire JF, McTague J-P, Rondelez F (1980) Rotational diffusion of sterically interacting rodlike macromolecules. Phys Rev Lett 45:1891
Martyn MT, Groves DJ, Coates PD (2000) In process measurement of apparent extensional viscosity of low density polyethylene melts using flow visualisation. Plast Rubber Compos 29:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1179/146580100101540653
Maxwell JC (1874) Iv. on double refraction in a viscous fluid in motion. Proc R Soc Lond 22:46–47. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1873.0011
Merzkirch W (2018) Streaming Birefringence. In: Yang WJ (ed) Handbook of flow visualization. Routledge, London, pp 181–184
Meyer EL, Fuller GG, Clark RC, Kulicke WM (1993) Investigation of xanthan gum solution behavior under shear flow using rheooptical techniques. Macromolecules 26:504–511. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00055a016
Mykhaylyk OO, Warren NJ, Parnell AJ, Pfeifer G, Laeuger J (2016) Applications of shear-induced polarized light imaging (SIPLI) technique for mechano-optical rheology of polymers and soft matter materials. J Polym Sci Part B 54:2151–2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24111
Nakagaki M, Heller W (1975) Recomputation of certain functions in the Peterlin-Stuart theory of flow birefringence and directions for the evaluation of experimental data in terms of molecular weights and molecular dimensions. J Chem Phys 62:333–340
Ober TJ, Soulages J, McKinley GH (2011) Spatially resolved quantitative rheo-optics of complex fluids in a microfluidic device. J Rheol 55:1127–1159
Onuma T, Otani Y (2014) A development of two-dimensional birefringence distribution measurement system with a sampling rate of 1.3 MHz. Opt Commun 315:69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2013.10.086
Parker RM, Guidetti G, Williams CA, Zhao T, Narkevicius A, Vignolini S, Frka-Petesic B (2018) The self-assembly of cellulose nanocrystals: Hierarchical design of visual appearance. Adv Mater 30:1704477
Peebles FN, Prados JW, Honeycutt EH Jr (1964) Birefringent and rheologic properties of milling yellow suspensions. J Polym Sci Part C 5:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/polc.5070050105
Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y (2012) Drying cellulose nanofibrils: in search of a suitable method. Cellulose 19:91–102
Peterlin A (1938) Über die viskosität von verdünnten lösungen und suspensionen in abhängigkeit von der teilchenform. Z Phys 111:232–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01332211
Peterlin A, Stuart HA (1939a) Über die Bestimmung der Größe und Form, sowie der elektrischen, optischen und magnetischen Anisotropie von submikroskopischen Teilchen mit Hilfe der künstlichen Doppelbrechung und der inneren Reibung. Z Phys 112:129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01340060
Peterlin A, Stuart HA (1939b) Zur Theorie der Strömungsdoppelbrechung von Kolloiden und großen Molekülen in Lösung. Z Phys 112:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325633
Pih H (1980) Birefringent-fluid-flow method in engineering. Exp Mech 20:437–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320884
Pindera JT, Krishnamurthy AR (1978) Characteristic relations of flow birefringence. Exp Mech 18:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02326551
Rankin GW, Sabbah HN, Stein PD (1989) A streaming birefringence study of the flow at the junction of the aorta and the renal arteries. Exp Fluids 7:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207298
Scheraga HA, Edsall JT, Gadd JO Jr (1951) Double refraction of flow: numerical evaluation of extinction angle and birefringence as a function of velocity gradient. J Chem Phys 19:1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1748483
Schmitz E, Merzkirch W (1984) A test fluid for simulating blood flows. Exp Fluids 2:103–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00261329
Schneider T (2013) Spannungsoptik-Tomographie in Strömungen. Dissertation, TU Berlin. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-3484
Shafiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos SG (2012) Rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose aqueous suspensions. Langmuir 28:17124–17133
Smyth SF, Liang C-H, Mackay ME, Fuller GG (1995) The stress jump of a semirigid macromolecule after shear: comparison of the elastic stress to the birefringence. J Rheol 39:659–672. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550649
Sun Y-D, Sun Y-F, Sun Y, Xu XY, Collins MW (1999) Visualisation of dynamic flow birefringence of cardiovascular models. Opt Laser Technol 31:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-3992(99)00023-7
Tanaka R, Li S, Kashiwagi Y, Inoue T (2018) A self-build apparatus for oscillatory flow birefringence measurements in a Co-cylindrical geometry. Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi 46:221–226. https://doi.org/10.1678/rheology.46.221
Tanaka R, Kashiwagi Y, Okada Y, Inoue T (2019) Viscoelastic relaxation of cellulose nanocrystals in fluids: contributions of microscopic internal motions to flexibility. Biomacromol 21:408–417. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00943
Tao Y-G, den Otter WK, Padding JT, Dhont JKG, Briels WJ (2005) Brownian dynamics simulations of the self-and collective rotational diffusion coefficients of rigid long thin rods. J Chem Phys 122:244903
Teraoka I, Hayakawa R (1989) Theory of dynamics of entangled rod-like polymers by use of a mean-field green function formulation. II. Rotational diffusion. J Chem Phys 91:2643–2648
Tomlinson RA, Pugh D, Beck SBM (2006) Experiment and modelling of birefringent flows using commercial CFD code. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 27:1054–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2006.01.007
Wayland H (1964) Streaming birefringence as a rheological research tool. J Polym Sci Part C 5:11–36
Yevlampieva NP, Pavlov GM, Rjumtsev EI (1999) Flow birefringence of xanthan and other polysaccharide solutions. Int J Biol Macromol 26:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-8130(99)00096-3
Funding
Open access funding provided by Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lane, C., Rode, D. & Rösgen, T. Birefringent properties of aqueous cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Cellulose 29, 6093–6107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04646-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04646-y