Abstract
Charged groups on the surface of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) control the colloidal stability and electrostatic and rheological properties of aqueous CNC suspensions, as well as their ability to self-assemble into liquid crystalline structures with unique optical properties. CNCs extracted from wood pulp by sulfuric acid hydrolysis typically contain 200–300 mmol/kg of anionic sulfate half-esters introduced at some of the hydroxyl sites. Two analysis methods to determine CNC surface charge are presented in the published literature: total sulfur content determination by elemental analysis and protonated sulfate half-ester group determination by conductometric titration with sodium hydroxide. The main drawbacks to elemental analysis are the expensive and complicated instrumentation and sample preparation procedures it requires. Conductometric titration is a much simpler method, but requires complete protonation of the CNC samples in order to obtain an accurate value. Unfortunately, significant discrepancies between the sulfate half-ester contents measured with the two techniques are often observed in the literature, particularly with neutralized Na-CNCs. There are specific assumptions and pitfalls inherent to both analysis methods which must be taken into account and reconciled if comparable results are to be achieved by titration and elemental analysis. In particular, sample preparation is crucial to obtaining accurate determinations of sulfate half-ester content by conductometric titration; however, methods differ widely among laboratories and are often not specified in detail, rendering published results meaningless. We have developed a rapid sample preparation protocol which allows quantitative and accurate determination of the sulfate half-ester content of CNCs from various cellulosic feedstocks (for H- and Na-CNCs, in both never-dried and redispersed dried forms) by conductometric titration, yielding results in good agreement with the total sulfur content determined by elemental analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abitbol T, Kloser E, Gray DG (2013) Estimation of the surface sulfur content of cellulose nanocrystals prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 20(2):785–794
Araki J (2013) Electrostatic or steric?—preparations and characterizations of well-dispersed systems containing rod-like nanowhiskers of crystalline polysaccharides. Soft Matter 9(16):4125–4141
Araki J, Kuga S (2001) Effect of trace electrolyte on liquid crystal type of cellulose microcrystals. Langmuir 17(15):4493–4496
Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (1998) Flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose suspension prepared by acid treatment of native cellulose. Colloids Surf A 142(1):75–82
Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (1999) Influence of surface charge on viscosity behavior of cellulose microcrystal suspension. J Wood Sci 45(3):258–261
Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S (2001) Steric stabilization of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting. Langmuir 17(1):21–27
Beck S, Bouchard J (2014) Auto-catalyzed acidic desulfation of cellulose nanocrystals. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29(1):6–14
Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2011) Controlling the reflection wavelength of iridescent solid films of nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 12(1):167–172
Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2012) Dispersibility in water of dried nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 13(5):1486–1494
Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6(2):1048–1054
Bio-Rad Laboratories AG® 501-X8 and Bio-Rex® MSZ 501(D) Mixed Bed Resin Instruction Manual, LIT205 Rev B. Received February 12, 2013
Bio-Rad Technical Support FAQ: http://www.bio-rad.com/en-ca/faq/173/technical-support-faq. Accessed 6 Dec 2013
Brinchi L, Cotana F, Fortunati E, Kenny JM (2013) Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications. Carbohydr Polym 94(1):154–169
Camarero Espinosa S, Kuhnt T, Foster EJ, Weder C (2013) Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 14(4):1223–1230
de Dardel F (2013) Ion exchange resin structure. http://dardel.info/IX/resin_structure.html. Accessed 28 Nov 2013
Dong XM, Gray DG (1997) Effect of counterions on ordered phase formation in suspensions of charged rodlike cellulose crystallites. Langmuir 13(8):2404–2409
Dong XM, Kimura T, Revol J-F, Gray DG (1996) Effects of ionic strength on the isotropic-chiral nematic phase transitions of suspensions of cellulose crystallites. Langmuir 12(8):2076–2082
Dong XM, Revol J-F, Gray DG (1998) Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5(1):19–32
DOWEX Ion Exchange Resins Tech Facts Form No. 177-01836-502XQRP: Color Release from Cation Resins. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_0036/0901b80380036ca7.pdf?filepath=liquidseps/pdfs/noreg/177-01836.pdf&fromPage=GetDoc. Accessed 6 Dec 2013
DOWEX Ion Exchange Resins Tech Facts Form No. 177-01755-0207: Using Ion Exchange Resin Selectivity Coefficients. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_0054/0901b803800541d8.pdf?filepath=liquidseps/pdfs/noreg/177-01755.pdf&fromPage=GetDoc. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
Gu J, Catchmark JM, Kaiserc EQ, Archibald DD (2013) Quantification of cellulose nanowhiskers sulfate esterification levels. Carbohydr Polym 92(2):1809–1816
Hamad WY, Hu TQ (2010) Structure–property–process inter-relationships in nanocrystalline cellulose extraction. Can J Chem Eng 88(3):392–402
Hasani M, Cranston ED, Westman G, Gray DG (2008) Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter 4(11):2238–2244
Jiang F, Esker AR, Roman M (2010) Acid-catalyzed and solvolytic desulfation of H2SO4–hydrolyzed cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 26(23):17919–17925
Katz S, Beatson RP, Scallan AM (1984) The determination of strong and weak acid groups in sulfite pulps. Svensk Papperstid 87(6):R48–R53
Kaur H (2010) Instrumental methods of chemical analysis. Global Media, Meerut
Kloser E, Gray DG (2010) Surface grafting of cellulose nanocrystals with poly(ethylene oxide) in aqueous media. Langmuir 26(16):13450–13456
Lagerwall JPF, Schütz C, Salajkova M, Noh JH, Park JH, Scalia G, Bergström L (2014) Cellulose nanocrystal-based materials: from liquid crystal self-assembly and glass formation to multifunctional thin films. NPG Asia Mater 6:e80. doi:10.1038/am.2013.69
Leung ACW, Hrapovic S, Lam E, Liu Y, Male KB, Mahmoud KA, Luong JHT (2011) Characteristics and properties of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals prepared from a novel one-step procedure. Small 7(3):302–305
Leung CW, Luong JHT, Hrapovic S, Lam E, Liu Y, Male KB, Mahmoud K, Rho D (2012) Cellulose nanocrystals from renewable biomass. U.S. Patent Application US 2012/0244357 A1
Lin N, Huang J, Dufresne A (2012) Preparation, properties and applications of polysaccharide nanocrystals in advanced functional nanomaterials: a review. Nanoscale 4(11):3274–3294
Marchessault RH, Koch MJ, Yang JT (1961a) Some hydrodynamic properties of ramie crystallites in phosphate buffer. J Colloid Sci 16(4):345–360
Marchessault RH, Morehead FF, Koch MJ (1961b) Some hydrodynamic properties of neutral suspensions of cellulose crystallites as related to size and shape. J Colloid Sci 16(4):327–344
Revol J-F, Godbout L, Dong X-M, Gray DG, Chanzy H, Maret G (1994) Chiral nematic suspensions of cellulose crystallites; phase separation and magnetic field orientation. Liq Cryst 16(1):127–134
Revol J-F, Godbout L, Gray DG (1998) Solid self-assembled films of cellulose with chiral nematic order and optically variable properties. J Pulp Pap Sci 24(5):146–149
Rohm and Haas Company (2008) Amberlite™ MB6113 Industrial Grade Non-Regenerable Mixed Bed Resin. Lenntech Product Information Sheet PDS 333 A
Roman M, Winter WT (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5(5):1671–1677
Salajková M, Berglund LA, Zhou Q (2012) Hydrophobic cellulose nanocrystals modified with quaternary ammonium salts. J Mater Chem 22(37):19798–19805
Samuelson O (1953) Ion exchangers in analytical chemistry. Wiley, New York
Shafiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos SG (2012) Rheology of nanocrystalline cellulose aqueous suspensions. Langmuir 28(49):17124–17133
Shafiei-Sabet S, Hamad WY, Hatzikiriakos SG (2013) Influence of degree of sulfation on the rheology of cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Rheol Acta 52(8–9):741–751
Suflet DM, Chitanu GC, Popa VI (2006) Phosphorylation of polysaccharides: new results on synthesis and characterisation of phosphorylated cellulose. React Funct Polym 66(11):1240–1249
Teixeira EM, de Oliveira CR, Mattoso LHC, Corrêa AC, Paladin PD (2010) Cotton nanofibers obtained by different hydrolytic acid conditions. Polímeros 20(4):264–268
Wang H, Roman M (2011) Formation and properties of chitosan–cellulose nanocrystal polyelectrolyte–macroion complexes for drug delivery applications. Biomacromolecules 12(5):1585–1593
Wang N, Ding E, Cheng R (2007) Thermal degradation behaviors of spherical cellulose nanocrystals with sulfate groups. Polymer 48(12):3486–3493
Winter SS (1956) Ion-exchange separations. J Chem Ed 33(9):473–477
Wu Q, Meng Y, Wang S, Li Y, Fu S, Ma L, Harper D (2014) Rheological behavior of cellulose nanocrystal suspension: influence of concentration and aspect ratio. J Appl Polym Sci 131(15):40525
Zhong L, Fu S, Peng X, Zhan H, Sun R (2012) Colloidal stability of negatively charged cellulose nanocrystalline in aqueous systems. Carbohydr Polym 90(1):644–649
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Alexander Cheng for performing the batch ion-exchange resin treatment experiments; Giuseppa Zambito and Beth Ambayec for performing the ICP-AES analyses; Philippe Bourassa for analysis of the CelluForce CNC sample; Naceur Jemaa, Carole Fraschini and Greg Chauve for insightful suggestions; and the FPInnovations CNC pilot plant team, particularly Bill Reed, for providing the NBSK, NBSS and sisal CNCs and for helpful discussions. We also thank Tiffany Abitbol for valuable discussions. We gratefully acknowledge René Goguen (CelluForce), Christophe Danumah (AITF), Alan Rudie (USFPL), and Bruno Jean (Cermav) for providing CNC samples and for useful information.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beck, S., Méthot, M. & Bouchard, J. General procedure for determining cellulose nanocrystal sulfate half-ester content by conductometric titration. Cellulose 22, 101–116 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0513-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0513-y