Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries and their CSR: A Conceptual Framework of the Management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a lack of theoretical consensus on how multinational enterprises (MNEs) should implement corporate social responsibility (CSR) to build legitimacy, particularly those operating in the smaller Asian emerging market context, where current growth in the global economy is being felt more acutely than elsewhere. This paper argues for theoretical integration of business ethics (BE) and international business (IB) research to address this concern. Hence, we explore the management of CSR strategies by MNE subsidiaries with specific interest on their proactive adoption of strategic CSR to obtain legitimacy in a foreign host country. Drawing on the recent CSR literature and related theories, including stakeholder theory and institutional theory, propositions and a conceptual framework are developed and presented. The framework integrates BE and IB concepts on the different dimensions of CSR and provides a theoretical derived explanation of the process for strategic adoption of global through to more local CSR strategies by MNE subsidiaries to build legitimacy in an emerging market context. In addition, the framework provides valuable insights into the adoption of different ethical approaches or CSR strategies based on the level of ethical pressure in a host country and the degree of CSR ingrainedness in the parent company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, R., Berrill, J., Hutson, E., & Kearney, C. (2011). What is a multinational corporation? Classifying the degree of firm-level multinationality. International Business Review, 20(5), 557–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aharoni, Y., & Brock, D. M. (2010). International business research: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of International Management, 16(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, R. R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amba-Rao, S. C. (1993). Multinational corporate social responsibility, ethics, interactions and Third World governments: An agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(7), 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthaud-Day, M. L. (2005). Transnational corporate social responsibility: A tri-dimensional approach to international CSR research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barin Cruz, L., & Boehe, D. M. (2010). How do leading retail MNCs leverage CSR globally? Insights from Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baughn, C. C., Bodie, N. L., & McIntosh, J. C. (2007). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumentritt, T. P., & Nigh, D. (2002). The integration of subsidiary political activities in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. T., Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 84–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S., Knight, G., Riesenberger, J., Rammal, H., & Freeman, S. (2012). Organisational participants that make international business happen, International business: The new realities (2nd ed., pp. 62–87). French Forest NSW: Pearson Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2007). CSR agendas for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J., Husted, B. W., Matten, D., & Santoro, M. (2010). Ahoy there! toward greater congruence and synergy between international business and business ethics theory and research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • FTSE. (2011). FTSE global equity index series country classification. Retrieved June 11, 2012 from http://www.ftse.com/Indices/Country_Classification/Downloads/Sept%202011/Sept_2011_Country_Classification_Update.pdf.

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: Global, local, substantive or diluted? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., Hong, P., & van Dolen, W. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in China: An analysis of domestic and foreign retailers’ sustainability dimensions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & van Tulder, R. (2010). International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International Business Review, 19(2), 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Maon, F. (2009). Introduction: Corporate social responsibility implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(SUPPL. 2), 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A. (2006). Global versus local CSR strategies. European Management Journal, 24(2–3), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Pleggenkuhle-Miles, E. G. (2009). Current debates in global strategy. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, F., Ehrgott, M., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2012). Local stakeholders and local legitimacy: MNEs’ social strategies in emerging economies. Journal of International Management, 18, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: Politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L. (2011). A Rawlsian view of CSR and game theory (part 1). In L. Sacconi, M. Blair, R. Freeman, & A. Vercelli (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: The contribution of economic theory and related disciplines (pp. 157–193). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, R., & Wu, Z. (2012). Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 343–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V. (2011). Business ethics in the South and South East Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2011). MNC strategic responses to ethical pressure: An institutional logic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia: 2004 survey results. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2006). Toward a responsible society, Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment (pp. 1–24). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries: A stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(SUPPL.2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Business Discipline, Adelaide Business School, The University of Adelaide, 10 Pulteney Street, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia

    Kristin Hah & Susan Freeman

Authors
  1. Kristin Hah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Freeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hah, K., Freeman, S. Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries and their CSR: A Conceptual Framework of the Management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies. J Bus Ethics 122, 125–136 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1753-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1753-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation