Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improved Representation of Land-surface Heterogeneity in a Non-hydrostatic Numerical Weather Prediction Model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the relevance of accurate surface parameters, in particular soil moisture, and of parameterizations for heterogeneous land surfaces, for the prediction of sensible and latent heat fluxes by a mesoscale weather forecast model with horizontal grid resolution of 7 km. The analysis is based on model integrations for a 30-day period, which are compared both to flux measurements obtained from the LITFASS-2003 field experiment and to high-resolution-model (1-km grid spacing) results. At first, the relevance of improved parameter sets and input data compared to usual operational practice for an accurate prediction of near-surface fluxes is shown and discussed. It is demonstrated that an observation-based land-surface assimilation scheme leads to an improved soil moisture analysis, which is shown to be essential for the realistic simulation of surface fluxes. Secondly, the implementation of two efficient parameterization strategies for subgrid-scale variability of the surface, the mosaic and the tile approach, is presented. Using these methods, the simulations are in better agreement with measurements than simulations with simple aggregation methods that use effective surface parameters. Integrations with the mosaic approach reproduce high resolution simulations very well and more accurately than simulations with the tile method. Finally, the high resolution simulations are analyzed to justify and discuss the approximations underlying both methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ament F, Crewell S, Simmer C (2004) Impact of horizontal model resolution on cloud parameters forecasted by a non-hydrostatic mesoscale model. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on clouds and precipitation –ICCP 2004, Bologna 19–23July, pp 1883–1886

  • Avissar R, Schmidt T (1998) An evaluation of the scale at which ground-surface heat flux patchiness affects the convective boundary layer using large-eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 55:2666–2689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avissar R, Pielke RA (1989) A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric models and its impact on regional meteorology. Mon Wea Rev 117:2113–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyrich F, Mengelkamp H-T et al (2006a) Evaporation over a heterogeneous land surface: EVA_GRIPS and the LITFASS-2003 experiment – an overview. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, this issue

  • Beyrich F, Leps J-P, Weisensee U, Bange J, Zittel P, Huneke S, Lohse H, Mengelkamp H-T, Foken T, Mauder M, Bernhofer C, Queck R, Meijninger WML, Kohsiek W, Lüdi A, Peters G, Münster H (2006b) Area-averaged surface fluxes over the heterogeneous LITFASS area from measurements, Boundary-Layer Meteorol, this issue

  • Businger J, Wyngaard J, Iszumi Y, Bradley E (1971) Flux profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J Atmos Sci 28:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Avissar R (1994) Impact of land surface moisture variability on local shallow convective cumulus and precipitation in large scale models. J Appl Meteorol 33:1382–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claussen M (1991) Estimation of areally-averaged surface fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 54:387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies H (1976) A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 102:405–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson R (1984) Modeling evapotranspiration for the three-dimensional global climate models. In: Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, Geophysical Monograph, vol 29. Maurice Ewing Volume 5:58–72

  • Doms G, Schättler U (1999) The nonhydrostatic limited-area model LM (Lokal-Modell) of DWD. Part I: Scientific documentation, available at Deutscher Wetterdienst Postfach 100465, 63004 Offenbach

  • EEA (2000) Corine land cover (CLC90), European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, http://dataservice.eea.eu.int/dataservice/

  • Findell KL, Eltahir EAB (1999) Analysis of the pathways relating soil moisture and subsequent rainfall in Illinois. J Geophys Res 104 D24:31565–31574

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F (1997) An approach for the representation of surface heterogeneity in land surface models. Part I: Theoretical framework. Mon Wea Rev 125:1885–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Avissar R (1997) Representation of heterogeneity effects in earth system modeling: experience from land surface modeling. Rev Geophys 4:413–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann G, Kerschgens M (2005) Comparison of methods for area-averaged surface energy fluxes over heterogeneous land surfaces using high-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations. Int J Climatol 25:379–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess R (2001) Assimilation of screen level observations by variational soil moisture analysis. Meteorol Atmos Phys 77(1–4):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Islam S (1998) Effects of subgrid-scale heterogeneity of soil wetness and temperature on grid-scale evaporation and its parameterization. Int J Climatol 18:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Islam S, Jiang L (1999) Approaches for aggregating heterogeneous surface parameters and fluxes for mesoscale and climate models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 93:313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen I, Heise E (1982) A new economic method for the computation of the surface temperature in numerical models. Contr Atmos Phys 55:128–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemp J, Wilhemson R (1978) The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J Atmos Sci 35:1070–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koster RD, Suarez MJ (1992) A comparative analysis of two land surface heterogeneity representations. J Climate 5:1379–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lhomme JP, Chehbouni A, Monteny B (1994) Effective parameters of surface-energy balance in heterogeneous landscape. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 71:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Avissar R (1994) The impact of spatial variability of land-surface characteristics on land-surface heat fluxes. J Climate 7:527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis J-F (1979) A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 17:187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn BH, Tao W-K, Wetzel PJ (1998) A study of landscape-generated deep moist convection. Mon Wea Rev 126:928–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahfouf JF (1990) A numerical simulation of the surface-water budget during HAPEX-MOBILHY. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 53:201–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt L (1996) The bulk aerodynamic formulation over heterogeneous surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:87–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt L, Sun J (1995) Dependence of surface exchange coefficients on averaging scale and grid size. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 121:1835–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauder M, Liebethal C, Göckede M, Leps J-P, Beyrich F, Foken T (2006) Processing and quality control of eddy covariance data during LITFASS-2003. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, this issue

  • Mellor G, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys Space Phys 20:851–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell KE et al (2004) The multi-institution North American land data assimilation system (NLDAS): utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. Res 109:D07S90, doi:10.1029/2003JD003823.

  • Mölders N, Raabe A (1996a) Numerical investigation on the influence of subgrid-scale surface heterogeneity on evaporation and cloud processes. J Appl Meteorol 35:782–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mölders N, Raabe A, Tetzlaff G (1996b) A comparison of two strategies on land surface heterogeneity used in a mesoscale ß meteorological model. Tellus 48A:733–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Molod A, Hadyee S, Waugh D (2003) A new look at modelling surface heterogeneity: extending its influence in the vertical. J Hydrometeorol 4:811–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronda RJ, van den Hurk BJJM, Holtslag AAM (2002) Spatial heterogeneity of the soil moisture content and its impact on surface flux densities and near-surface meteorology. J Hydrometeorol 3:556–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy SB, Weaver CP, Nolan DS, Avissar R (2003) A preferred scale for landscape forced mesoscale circulations. J Geophys Res 108:D22, doi:10.1029/2002JD003097

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlünzen KH, Katzfey JJ (2003) Relevance of sub-grid-scale land use effects for mesoscale models. Tellus 55A:232–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal M, Arritt RW, Clark C, Rabin R, Brown J (1995) Scaling evaluation of the effect of surface characteristics on potential for deep convection over uniform terrain. Mon Wea Rev 123:383–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seth A, Giorgi F, Dickinson RE (1994) Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surface: explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS). J Geophys Res 99:18651–18667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuffert G, Wilker H, Viterbo P, Drusch M, Mahfouf JF (2004) The usage of screen level parameters and microwave brightness temperature for soil moisture analysis. J Hydrometeorol 5:516–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuffert G, Gross P, Simmer C, Wood EF (2002) The influence of hydrologic modeling on predicted local weather: Two-way coupling of a mesoscale weather prediction model and a land surface hydrology model. J Hydrometerol 3:505–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steppeler J, Doms G, Schättler U, Bitzer HW, Gassmann A, Damrath U, Gregoric G (2003) Meso-gamma scale forecast using the non-hydrostatic model LM. Meteorol Atmos Phys 82:75–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trier SB, Chen F, Manning KW (2004) A study of convection initiation in a mesoscale model using high-resolution land surface initial conditions. Mon Wea Rev 132(12):2954–2976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS (1997) GTOPO30 Digital elevation model, Eros Data Center, US Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SD. http://edcaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30.asp

  • Weaver CP, Roy SB, Avissar R (2002) Sensitivity of simulated mesoscale atmospheric circulations resulting from landscape heterogeneity to aspects of model configurations. J Geophys Res 107:D20, doit.: 10.1029/2001JD000376

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Meteorologisches Institut der Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 20, 53121, Bonn, Germany

    Felix Ament & Clemens Simmer

Authors
  1. Felix Ament
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clemens Simmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Ament.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ament, F., Simmer, C. Improved Representation of Land-surface Heterogeneity in a Non-hydrostatic Numerical Weather Prediction Model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121, 153–174 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9066-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9066-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation