Skip to main content
Log in

Damages to masonry churches after 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence and definition of fragility curves

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a detailed report on a large sample of masonry churches damaged by the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. The first part of the work analyses the seismic sequence to give an overview of the occurred events in terms of both ground motion parameters and macro-seismic intensities. The surveyed data are organized into a database made, to date, of 990 cases, which represent almost one-fourth of the whole surveys performed during the emergency phase. Such a significant statistical sample was used to carry out a regional scale typological analysis in order to identify the most recurrent typologies of churches present in Central Italy. The analysis of the observed damage and usability outcomes allowed drawing some conclusions on the behaviour of the inspected churches under the 2016–2017 seismic sequence. The collected data were used to create damage probability matrixes for homogeneous classes of churches at different damage levels and, successively, to implement the corresponding fragility curves in terms of PGA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker J (2015) Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthq Spectra 31(1):579–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borri A, Castori G, Corradi M, Sisti R (2014) Masonry wall panels with GFRP and steel-cord strengthening subjected to cyclic shear: an experimental study. Constr Build Mater 56:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzi B, Faravelli M, Polli DA (2018) Central Italy sequence: simulated damage scenario for the main shocks of 2016. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0378-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) A statistical study on damaged buildings and ensuing review of MSK-76 scale. In: Proceedings of 7th European conference on “earthquake engineering”, Athens, Greece, pp 431–450

  • Casapulla C, Argiento LU (2018) In-plane frictional resistances in dry block masonry walls and rocking-sliding failure modes revisited and experimentally validated. Compos B Eng 132:197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casapulla C, Salzano P, Sandoli A, Argiento LU, Ceroni F, Calderoni B, Prota A (2017) Statistical analysis of the Sstructural damage to churches affected by the 2016-17 Central Italy earthquake sequence. In: Proceedings of 17th National conference on “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia” (ANIDIS 2017), Pistoia, Italy, pp (SS03)34–45 (in Italian)

  • Casapulla C, Argiento LU, Maione A (2018a) Seismic safety assessment of a masonry building according to Italian Guidelines on Cultural Heritage: simplified mechanical-based approach and pushover analysis. Bull Earthq Eng 16(7):2809–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casapulla C, Maione A, Argiento LU, Speranza E (2018b) Corner failure in masonry buildings: an updated macro-modeling approach with frictional resistances. Eur J Mech A Solids 70:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casapulla C, Giresini L, Argiento LU, Maione A (2019) Non-linear static and dynamic analysis of rocking masonry corners using rigid macro-block modelling. Int J Struct Stab Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455419501372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceroni F, Prota A (2009) Case study: seismic upgrade of a masonry bell tower using GFRP ties. ASCE J Compos Constr 13(3):188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceroni F, Salzano P (2018) Design provisions for FRCM systems bonded to concrete and masonry elements. Compos B Eng 143:230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceroni F, Cuzzilla R, Pecce M (2016) Assessment of performance of steel and GFRP bars as injected anchors in masonry walls. Constr Build Mater 123:78–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cescatti E, Taffarel S, da Porto F, Modena C (2017) Macroscale damage assessment of URM churches after the 2016 sequence in Centre of Italy. In: Proceedings of 17th national conference on “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia” (ANIDIS 2017), Pistoia, Italy, pp (SS03)46–55

  • Cescatti E, da Porto F, Modena C (2018) Analysis and comparison of EBR techniques applied to masonry vaults. Book chapter SP-324-12. In: de Felice G, Sneed LH, Nanni A (eds) Composites with inorganic matrix for repair of concrete and masonry structures. ACI American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ayala D, Speranza E (2003) Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. J Earthq Spectra 19(3):479–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Porto F, Silva F, Costa C, Modena C (2012) Macro-scale analysis of damage to churches after earthquake in Abruzzo (Italy) on April 6, 2009. J Earthq Eng 16(6):739–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Matteis G, Zizi M (2019a) Preliminary analysis on the effects of 2016 Central Italy earthquake on one-nave churches. In: Aguilar R, Torrealva D, Moreira S, Pando MA, Ramos LF (eds) Structural analysis of historical constructions, vol 18. RILEM Bookseries. Springer, Cham, pp 1268–1279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Matteis G, Zizi M (2019b) Seismic damage prediction of masonry churches by a PGA-based approach. Int J Archit Heritage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1597215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Matteis G, Criber E, Brando G (2014) Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry churches through the application of probabilistic methods. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on “structural analysis of historical constructions (SAHC 2014), Mexico City, Mexico, pp 1–12

  • De Matteis G, Criber E, Brando G (2016) Damage probability matrices for three-nave masonry churches in Abruzzi after the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake. Int J Archit Heritage 10(2–3):120–145

    Google Scholar 

  • De Matteis G, Zizi M, Corlito V (2017) Preliminary analysis of the effects of Centro-Italia earthquake on one-nave churches. In: Proceedings of 17th national conference on “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia” (ANIDIS 2017), Pistoia, Italy, pp (SS03)56–66 (in Italian)

  • Decanini L, Gavarini C, Mollaioli F (1995) Proposta di definizione delle relazioni tra intensità macrosismica e parametri del moto del suolo. In: Proceedings of 7th national conference on “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia” (ANIDIS 1995), Siena, Italy, pp 63–72 (in Italian)

  • Di Ludovico M, Digrisolo A, Moroni C, Graziotti F, Manfredi V, Prota A, Dolce M, Manfredi G (2018) Remarks on damage and response of school buildings after the Central Italy earthquake sequence. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0332-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doglioni F, Moretti A, Petrini V, Angeletti P (1994) Le chiese e il terremoto. Dalla vulnerabilità constatata nel terremoto del Friuli al miglioramento antisismico nel restauro. Verso una politica di prevenzione. Lint Editoriale Associati, Trieste, Italy (in Italian)

  • DPC (2001) Survey form for the cultural heritage—damage to churches. G.U. no. 116, 21/05/2001 (in Italian)

  • DPCM 23/02/2006 (2006) Approval of forms for the seismic damage assessment of cultural heritage buildings. G.U. no. 55, 7/03/2006 (in Italian)

  • DPCM 09/02/2011 (2011) Evaluation and mitigation of seismic risk to cultural heritage with reference to the ‘Technical Standards for Constructions, issued by DM 14/01/2008”. GU no. 47, 26/02/2011—Suppl. Ordinario no. 54 (in Italian)

  • Faenza L, Michelini A (2010) Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap. Geophys J Int 180(3):1138–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faenza L, Lauciani V, Michelini A (2016) The shakeMaps of the Amatrice, M6, earthquake. Annals of Geophysics 59. Fast Track 5:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragomeli A, Fragomeli A, Galasco A, Graziotti F, Guerrini G, Kallioras S, Magenes G, Malomo D, Mandirola M, Manzini CF, Marchesi B, Milanesi R, Morandi P, Penna A, Rossi A, Rosti A, Rota M, Senaldi IE, Tomassetti U, Cattari S, da Porto F, Sorrentino L (2017a) Comportamento degli edifici in muratura nella sequenza sismica dell’Italia centrale del 2016. Parte 1: quadro generale. Progettazione Sismica 8(2):49–77 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragomeli A, Galasco A, Graziotti F, Guerrini G, Kallioras S, Magenes G, Malomo D, Mandirola M, Manzini CF, Marchesi B, Milanesi R, Morandi P, Penna A, Rossi A, Rosti A, Rota M, Senaldi IE, Tomassetti U, Cattari S, Sorrentino L (2017b) Comportamento degli edifici in muratura nella sequenza sismica dell’Italia centrale del. Parte 2: esempi di centri colpiti. Progettazione Sismica 8(3):75–98 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli P, Peronace E, Tertulliani A (2016) Rapporto sugli effetti macrosismici del terremoto del 24 agosto 2016 di Amatrice in scala MCS. Rapporto congiunto DPC, CNR‐IGAG, INGV https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.161323 (in Italian)

  • Giaretton M, Valluzzi MR, Mazzon B, Modena C (2017) Out-of-plane shake-table tests of strengthened multi-leaf stone masonry walls. Bull Earthq Eng 15(10):4299–4317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaretton M, Dizhur D, Garbin E, Ingham JM, da Porto F (2018) In-plane strengthening of clay brick and block masonry walls using textile-reinforced mortar. J Compos Constr 22(5):04018028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giresini L, Casapulla C, Denysiuk R, Matos J, Sassu M (2018) Fragility curves for free and restrained rocking masonry façades in one-sided motion. Eng Struct 164:195–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuffré A (1991) Letture sulla meccanica delle murature storiche. Edizioni Kappa, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Capera AA, Albarello D, Gasperini P (2007) Aggiornamento relazioni fra l’intensità macrosismica e PGA. Progetto INGV-DPC S1, Deliverable D11. 2007. http://esse1.mi.ingv.it/d11.html (in Italian)

  • Grunthal G (ed) (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998. European Seismological Commission, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, 15, Luxemburg

  • Iervolino I, Baltzopoulos G, Chioccarelli E, Suzuki A (2017) Seismic actions on structures in the near-source region of the 2016 Central Italy sequence. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0295-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INGV (2012) Mappe di scuotimento-legge 122/2012. http://shakemap.rm.ingv.it

  • Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4(4):415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2004a) Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: I. Damage assessment and emergency planning. Earthq Spectra 20(2):377–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2004b) Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: II. Statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthq Spectra 20(2):395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2004c) Damage and vulnerability assessment of churches after the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20(S1):S271–S283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2005) Inventario e vulnerabilità del patrimonio monumentale dei parchi dell’Italia centro-meridionale e meridionale, Vol.III—Analisi di vulnerabilità e rischio degli edifici monumentali. L’Aquila: INGV/GNDT-Istituto Nazionale di geofisica e Vulcanologia/Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti

  • Lagomarsino S, Maggiolo L, Podestà S (2001) Vulnerabilità sismica delle chiese: proposta di una metodologia integrata per il rilievo, la prevenzione ed il rilievo del danno in emergenza. In: Proceedings of 10th national conference on “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia” (ANIDIS 2001), Potenza-Matera, Italy, pp 100–111 (in Italian)

  • Lourenço PB, Oliveira DV, Leite JC, Ingham JM, Modena C, Da Porto F (2013) Simplified indexes for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings: international database and validation. Eng Fail Anal 34:585–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzi L, Pacor F, Puglia R, Lanzano G, Felicetta C, D’Amico M, Michelini A, Faenza L, Lauciani V, Iervolino I, Baltzopoulos G, Chioccarelli E (2017) The Central Italy seismic sequence between August and December 2016: analysis of strong-motion observations. Seismol Res Lett 88(5):1219–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margottini C, Molin D, Serva L (1992) Intensity versus ground motion: a new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33(1):45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masi A, Chiauzzi L, Santarsiero G, Manfredi V, Biondi S, Spacone E, Del Gaudio C, Ricci P, Manfredi G, Verderame GM (2017) Seismic response of RC buildings during the Mw 6.0 August 24 2016 Central Italy earthquake: the Amatrice case study. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0277-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MiBACT (2015) Direttiva 23 aprile 2015: Aggiornamento della direttiva 12 dicembre 2013, relativa alle “Procedure per la gestione delle attività di messa in sicurezza e salvaguardia del patrimonio culturale in caso di emergenze derivanti da calamità naturali”. G.U. no. 169, 23/07/2015 (in Italian)

  • Michelini A, Faenza L, Luciani V, Malagnini L (2008) Shakemap implementation in Italy. Seismol Res Lett 79(5):688–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Office and Department of Civil Protection (2017) Rapporto di attività inerente la gestione emergenziale conseguente agli eventi sismici che hanno interessato i territori del Centro Italia a partire dal 24 Agosto 2016. Rapporto di Attività alla camera dei deputati OCD117-3048 (in Italian)

  • Ramaglia G, Lignola GP, Fabbrocino F, Prota A (2017) Numerical modelling of masonry barrel vaults reinforced with textile reinforced mortars. Key Eng Mater 747:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santarsiero G, Di Sarno L, Giovinazzi S, Masi A, Cosenza E, Biondi S (2018) Performance of the health care facilities during the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0330-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieberg A (1930) Scala MCS (Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg). Geologie der Erdbeben, Handbuch der Geophysik 2:552–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Souriau A (2006) Quantifying felt events: a joint analysis of intensities, accelerations and dominant frequencies. J Seismol 10(1):23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taffarel S, Giaretton M, da Porto F, Modena C (2016) Damage and vulnerability assessment of URM buildings after the 2012 Northern Italy earthquakes. In: Proceedings of 16th Brick and Block masonry conference (IBMAC2016), Padua, Italy, pp 2455–2462

  • Tertulliani A, Azzaro R (2016a) QUEST—Rilievo macrosismico in EMS98 per il terremoto di Amatrice del 24 agosto 2016, Rapporto interno INGV. Roma, Italy (in Italian)

  • Tertulliani A, Azzaro R (2016b) QUEST—Rilievo macrosismico per i terremoti nell’Italia centrale. Aggiornamento dopo le scosse del 26 e 30 Ottobre 2016. Rapporto interno INGV. Roma, Italy

  • Tertulliani A, Azzaro R (2017) QUEST—Rilievo macrosismico in EMS98 per la sequenza sismica in Italia Centrale: aggiornamento dopo il 18 Gennaio 2017. Rapporto interno INGV. Roma, Italy

  • Valluzzi MR, da Porto F, Modena C (2004) Behavior and modeling of strengthened three-leaf stone masonry walls. Mater Struct 37(3):184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valluzzi MR, Binda L, Modena C (2005) Mechanical behaviour of historic masonry structures strengthened by bed joints structural repointing. Constr Build Mater 19(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valluzzi MR, Salemi G, Deiana R, Faresin E, Giacomello G, Giaretton M, Panizza M, Pasetto M, Calò S, Battistella A, Frestazzi A (2015) Integrated ND methodologies for the evaluation of the adhesion of frescoes on stone masonry walls. Brussels, Belgium, s.n. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on “emerging technologies in non-destructive testing (ETNDT6)”, Brussels, Belgium, pp 505–510

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors want to acknowledge MiBACT, Department of Civil Protection and ReLUIS consortium for giving the possibility to help in the emergency phase and to analyse the gathered dataset. A special thank goes to all collaborators from both universities (Padova, Napoli Federico II, Napoli Parthenope) who passionately surveyed and judged all the inspected churches.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elvis Cescatti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cescatti, E., Salzano, P., Casapulla, C. et al. Damages to masonry churches after 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence and definition of fragility curves. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 297–329 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00729-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00729-7

Keywords

Navigation