Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating Human and Natural Systems in Community Psychology: An Ecological Model of Stewardship Behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Community psychology (CP) research on the natural environment lacks a theoretical framework for analyzing the complex relationship between human systems and the natural world. We introduce other academic fields concerned with the interactions between humans and the natural environment, including environmental sociology and coupled human and natural systems. To demonstrate how the natural environment can be included within CP’s ecological framework, we propose an ecological model of urban forest stewardship action. Although ecological models of behavior in CP have previously modeled health behaviors, we argue that these frameworks are also applicable to actions that positively influence the natural environment. We chose the environmental action of urban forest stewardship because cities across the United States are planting millions of trees and increased citizen participation in urban tree planting and stewardship will be needed to sustain the benefits provided by urban trees. We used the framework of an ecological model of behavior to illustrate multiple levels of factors that may promote or hinder involvement in urban forest stewardship actions. The implications of our model for the development of multi-level ecological interventions to foster stewardship actions are discussed, as well as directions for future research to further test and refine the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbari, H., Pomerantz, M., & Taha, H. (2001). Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Solar Energy, 70(3), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., & Zumbrunnen, C. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience, 53(12), 1169–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T. (2010). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bixler, R. D., & Floyd, M. F. (1997). Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G., Burke, D. D., Little, B. L., & Paul, H. J. (2009). A comparison of service-learning and employee volunteering programs. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, S. E. (2011). It takes a stewardship village: Is community-based urban tree stewardship effective? Cities and the Environment, 3(1), Article 3, 1–8. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol3/iss1/3/.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A. L., & Bishop, B. J. (2011). Chasing our tails: Psychological, institutional and societal paradoxes in natural resource management, sustainability, and climate change in Australia. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(3–4), 354–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. H. (2003). Environmental sociology and the explanation of environmental reform. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 306–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, P., & Mouro, C. (2011). Psycho-social processes in dealing with legal innovation in the community: Insights from biodiversity conservation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(3–4), 362–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R., Jr, & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13(1), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. R., Jr, & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1), 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culley, M. R., & Angelique, H. (2011). Participation, power, and the role of community psychology in environmental disputes: A tale of two nuclear cities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(3–4), 410–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Culley, M. R., & Hughey, J. (2008). Power and public participation in a hazardous waste dispute: A community case study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1), 99–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. (2011). Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: Where to intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(4), 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. H., & Bush, R. A. (2007). A community psychology view of environmental organization processes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40(1), 146–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeBate, R. D., Baldwin, J. A., Thompson, Z., Nickelson, J., Alfonso, M. L., Bryant, C. A., et al. (2009). VERB™ summer scorecard: Findings from a multi-level community-based physical activity intervention for tweens. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3), 363–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Conservation. (2011). Emerald ash borer awareness week: May 22–28, 2011. Retrieved May 21, 2011 from http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/74604.html.

  • DiClemente, R. J., Salazar, L. F., & Crosby, R. A. (2007). A review of STD/HIV preventive interventions for adolescents: Sustaining effects using an ecological approach. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(8), 888–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R. (1979). Environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 243–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Marshall, B. K. (2007). Environmental sociology. In C. D. Bryant & D. K. Peck (Eds.), 21st century sociology: A reference handbook (pp. 329–340). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmendorf, W. (2008). The importance of trees and nature in community: A review of relative literature. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 34(3), 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 234–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (1997). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grese, R. E., Kaplan, R., Ryan, R. L., & Buxton, J. (2000). Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs. In P. H. Gobster & R. Hull (Eds.), Restoring nature: Perspectives from the social sciences and humanities (pp. 265–280). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. R., Johnson, G. R., McDonnough, M. H., Burban, L. L, & Monear, J. K. (2010). Tree owner’s manual. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. Retrieved from www.treeownersmanual.info.

  • Johnston, M., & Shimada, L. D. (2004). Urban forestry in a multicultural society. Journal of Arboriculture, 30(3), 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O., & Cloke, P. (2002). Tree cultures. The place of trees and trees in their place berg. Oxford, UK: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (2007). Employees’ reactions to nearby nature at their workplace: The wild and the tame. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(1–2), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. In the experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (2009). Creating a larger role for environmental psychology: The reasonable person model as an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (1966). Ecological constraints on mental health services. American Psychologist, 21(6), 535–539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G., Ryan, A. M., Altman, B. E., & Stelzner, S. P. (2000). Understanding and changing social systems: An ecological view. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 133–159). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C., Coley, R. L., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-City neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 823–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., Perkins, D., & Perkins, D. (2004). Introduction: An overview of community psychology. In principles of community psychology: perspectives and applications (3rd ed.). USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C. L., et al. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems. AMBIO: A Journal of the HumanEnvironment, 36(8), 639–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, V. I., Pearson-Mims, C. H., Tarnai, J., & Dillman, D. A. (2004). How urban residents rate and rank the benefits and problems associated with trees in cities. Journal of Arboriculture, 30(1), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, D. W., & Mitchell, S. G. (2009). Introduction to special issue on social ecological approaches to community health research and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3), 213–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, J. W., Sundstrom, E., & Shields, M. (1979). The relationship of avowed life satisfaction to public acceptance of and expectations about a nuclear power plant. Journal of Community Psychology, 7(4), 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. W. T., Svendsen, E. S., Campbell, L. K., Greenfeld, J., Braden, J., King, K. L., et al. (2010). Biological, social and urban design factors affecting youth street tree mortality in New York City. Cities and the Environment, 3(1), Article 1, 1–15. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol3/iss1/5/.

  • McLaren, L., & Hawe, P. (2005). Ecological perspectives in health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(1), 6–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, E. G. (2006). Urban forestry in North America. Renewable Resources Journal, 24(3), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, E. G., & Ferrini, F. (2010). Trees are good, but. Arborist News, 19(5), 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I., Sullivan, W. C., & Kuo, F. E. (1998). Ecological restoration volunteers: The benefits of participation. Urban Ecosystems, 2(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MillionTreesNYC. (2012). Community Tree Give-Aways. Retrieved from http://milliontreesnyc.org/html/plant/put_down_roots.shtml. Accessed 11 May 2012.

  • Moskell, C., Broussard Allred, S., & Ferenz, G. (2010). Examining motivations and recruitment strategies for urban forestry volunteers. Cities and the Environment, 3(1), Article 9, 1–28. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol3/iss1/9/.

  • Okvat, H. A., & Zautra, A. J. (2011). Community gardening: A parsimonious path to individual, community, and environmental resilience. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(3–4), 374–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (2002). Considerations of community: The context and process of volunteerism. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 846–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phalen, K. B. (2009). An invitation for public participation in ecological restoration: The reasonable person model. Ecological Restoration, 27(2), 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pincetl, S. (2010). From the sanitary city to the sustainable city: Challenges to institutionalizing biogenic (nature’s services) infrastructure. Local Environment, 15(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poland, T. M., & McCullough, D. G. (2006). Emerald ash borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. Journal of Forestry, 104(3), 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quimby, C. C., & Angelique, H. (2011). Identifying barriers and catalysts to fostering pro-environmental behavior: Opportunities and challenges for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(3–4), 388–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, R. A., Simon, G., & Braden, J. (2010). Public reactions to new street tree planting. Cities and the Environment, 3(1), Article 10, 1–21. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol3/iss1/10/.

  • Rich, R. C., Edelstein, M., Hallman, W. K., & Wandersman, A. H. (1995). Citizen participation and empowerment: The case of local environmental hazards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 657–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, M. (2010). Community psychology, the natural environment and global climate change. In G. Nelson & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, M., & Reich, S. M. (2011). Community psychology and global climate change: Introduction to the special section. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(3–4), 349–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. L., Kaplan, R., & Grese, R. E. (2001). Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(5), 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, J. F., & Owen, N. (2002). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schensul, J. J., & Trickett, E. (2009). Introduction to multi-level community based culturally situated interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43(3), 232–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. C. (2009). Planning advisory service, Report Number 555: Planning the urban forest: Ecology, economy, and community development. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. A. (2001). Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy and the movement for civic renewal. Ewing, NJ: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R., Learey, F., Summit, J., & Tirrell, M. (1994). The social benefits of resident involvement in tree planting. Journal of Arboriculture, 20(3), 170–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Still, D. T., & Gerhold, H. D. (1997). Motivations and task preferences of urban forestry volunteers. Journal of Arboriculture, 23(3), 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., Grzywacz, J., McMahan, S., & Phillips, K. (2003). Increasing the health promotive capacity of human environments. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 4–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summit, J., & McPherson, M. G. (1998). Residential tree planting and care a study of attitudes and behavior in Sacramento. California. Journal of Arboriculture, 24(2), 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, E. S., & Campbell, L. K. (2008). Urban ecological stewardship: Understanding the structure, function and network of community-based urban land management. Cities and the Environment, 1(1), Article 5, 1–31. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol1/iss1/4/.

  • Tidball, K. G., & Krasny, M. E. (2011). Urban environmental education from a social-ecological perspective: Conceptual framework for civic ecology education. Cities and the Environment, 3(1), Article 11. http://escholarship.bc.edu/cate/vol3/iss1/11.

  • Tidball, K. G., Krasny, M. E., Svendsen, E., Campbell, L., & Helphand, K. (2010). Stewardship, learning, and memory in disaster resilience. Environmental Education Research, 16(5), 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J. (2009). Multilevel community-based culturally situated interventions and community impact: An ecological perspective. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43(3), 257–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, C. (2009). Measuring ecological validity: A theory-based assessment of ecological validity in community psychology research. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Graduate School of Vanderbilt University.

  • Voorhees, C., & Perkins, D. D. (2007). Is ecological research ecological? Is research validity valid? In Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for community research and action, Pasadena, CA.

  • Webb, D. B. (1989). PBB: An environmental contaminant in Michigan. Journal of Community Psychology, 17(1), 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. L., Blahna, D. J., Brinkley, W., & Romolini, M. (2011). Environmental stewardship footprint research: Linking human agency and ecosystem health in the Puget Sound region. Urban Ecosystems, Online First 26 April 2011 doi:10.1007/s11252-011-0175-6.

  • Young, R. F. (2011). Planting the living city. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(4), 368–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Hussain, A., Deng, J., & Letson, N. (2007). Public attitudes toward urban trees and supporting urban tree programs. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 797–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Christine Moskell & Shorna Broussard Allred

Authors
  1. Christine Moskell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shorna Broussard Allred
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Moskell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moskell, C., Allred, S.B. Integrating Human and Natural Systems in Community Psychology: An Ecological Model of Stewardship Behavior. Am J Community Psychol 51, 1–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9532-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9532-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation