Abstract
Yes we can! is a community-building initiative funded by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation that aims to improve educational and economic outcomes in Battle Creek, Michigan by mobilizing low-income communities and resident leaders and building their capacity to influence the decisions and policies that impact their lives. This paper describes the strategies pursued during the first phase of this initiative to foster resident mobilization by building small wins within the neighborhood. Primarily through a neighborhood-based mini-grant program and staff supports to encourage collective action, Yes we can! has started to increase levels of resident mobilization within the seven economically distressed neighborhoods that initially partnered with the W. K. Kellogg Foundation on this effort. The specific programming components and how they were implemented as well as the initial successes experienced are described. Lessons learned are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As part of the evaluation of this initiative, the evaluation team conducted in-depth interviews with 28 leaders from the seven participating neighborhoods to document the story of change that was unfolding in the neighborhoods. Informants were asked to describe the changes that were occurring and to explain how and why these changes came about. The findings presented here were all strongly and solely attributed to the mini-grant program.
References
Arcidiacono, C., Sommantico, M., & Procentese, F. (2001). Neapolitan youth’s sense of community and the problem of unemployment. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 465–473.
Armenakis, A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46, 681–703.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
Chaskin, R. J. (2000). Lessons learned from the implementation of the Neighborhood and Family Initiative. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Chaskin, R., Brown, P., Venkatish, S., & Vidal, A. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Aldine Degruyter.
Chavis, D. M., Florin, P., & Felix, M. R. J. (1992). Nurturing grassroots initiatives for community development: The role of enabling systems. In T. Mizrahi & J. Morrison (Eds.), Community and social administration: Advances, trends and emerging principles. Haworth Press.
Cornell Empowerment Group (1998). Empowerment and family support. Networking Bulletin, 1, 1–23.
Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., Su, M., & Chow, J. (1995) Community level factors and child maltreatment rates. Child Development, 66, 1262–1276.
Coulton, C. J., & Hollister, R. (1999). Measuring comprehensive community initiative outcomes using data available in small areas. In P. Connell, A. C. Kubish, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Theory,measurement, and analysis. The Aspen Institute.
Easterling, D. V., Gallagher, K. M., & Lodwick, D. G. (1998). Promoting health at the community level. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Fawcett, S. B., Lewis, R. K., Paine Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Richter, K. P., Williams, E. L., & Copple, B. (1997). Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: The case of project freedom. Health Education and Behavior, 24, 812–828.
Foster-Fishman, P., Quon-Huber, M., & Pierce, S. (2004). Assessing the current state of resident leadership in Battle Creek. Report to the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
Foster-Fishman, P., Nowell, B., Deacon, Z., Nievar, A., & McCann, P. (In press). Using methods that matter: The impact of reflection, dialogue, and voice. American Journal of Community Psychology.
Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.
Goodman, R. M., Speers, M. A., McLeroy, K. L., Fawcett, S., Kegler, M., Parker, E., Smith, S., Sterling, I. T., & Wallerstein, N. (1998). Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Education & Behavior, 25(3), 258–278.
Green, G. P., & Haines, A. (2002). Asset building and community development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murphy, P. W., & Cunningham, J. V. (2003). Organizing for community controlled development: Renewing civil society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Neighborhood Small Grants Network, http://www.nsgn.org. September 25, 2005.
Norton, B. L., McLeroy, K. R., Burdine, J. N., Felix, M. R. J., & Dorsey, A. M. (2002). Community capacity: Concept, theory and methods. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. C Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health (pp. 194–227). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Nowell, B., Berkowitz, S., Deacon, Z., & Foster-Fishman, P. (2004). Revealing the cues within community places: Stories of identity, history, and possibility. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Rothman, J. (1974). Three models of community organizing practices. In F. M. Cox, J. L. Erlich, J. Rothman, & J. E. Tropman (Eds.), Strategies of community organization (pp. 22–58). Itasca, IL: Peacock Publishers Inc.
Smock, K. (1997). Comprehensive community initiatives: A new generation of urban revitalization strategies. Northwestern University.
Speer, P. W., Jackson, C. B., & Peterson, N. (2001). The relationship between social cohesion and empowerment: Support and new implications for theory. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 716–732.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 171–186.
Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1), 40–49.
White, L. (2003). The role of systems research and operational research in community involvement: A case stuffy of a health action zone. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 20, 133–145.
Wilson, W. J. (1996). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725–750.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all of the members of the Yes we can! strategy team and the seven Yes we can! Connectors for their thoughtful work on this initiative. The story told here would not be possible without their efforts and insights.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foster-Fishman, P.G., Fitzgerald, K., Brandell, C. et al. Mobilizing Residents for Action: The Role of Small Wins and Strategic Supports. Am J Community Psychol 38, 143–152 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-006-9081-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-006-9081-0