Skip to main content

Reterritorializing as Community Activism in an Urban Community-School Transformation Initiative

  • Chapter
Deterritorializing/Reterritorializing

Part of the book series: Breakthroughs in the Sociology of Education ((BSE))

  • 447 Accesses

Abstract

A resident-driven school and community transformation initiative in upstate New York, the Coalition for the Children of Lakeview (CCL), is the site for this chapter’s critical geography analysis. A Planning Panel1 (PP) of approximately 116 individuals representing residents (51%) and social service and governmental agency representatives (non-residents) (49%) was formed in 2005 to make critical decisions regarding the content of the CCL plan (e.g., specific foci such as k-16 education, employment, housing, public safety).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ares, N., & Buendía, E. (2007). Spatialized and spatializing practices: Commodifying literacy programs. In J. Larson (Ed.), Literacy as snake oil (2nd ed.). Germany: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ares, N., Larson, J., O’Connor, K. C., & Carlisle, J. (2007, April). Getting started: First stages of community reform. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ares, N., Larson, J., & O’Connor, K. (2008, March). Rochester children’s zone ethnography: Understanding school/community relationships in an urban change initiative. Paper presented at the Penn Ethnography Forum, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BlackPast.org. (2016). The great migration (1915–1960). Retrieved from http://www.blackpast.org/aah/great-migration-1915-1960

  • Brenner, N. (1995). Remaking scale: Competition and cooperation in prenational and postnational. In H. Eskelinen & F. Snickars (Eds.), The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration (pp. 59–74). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. J., Greene, S., & McKenna, M. K. (2016). A critical geographic approach to youth civic engagement: Reframing educational opportunity zones and the use of public spaces. Urban Education, 51(2), 143–169. doi:10.1177/0042085914543670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard. P., Kitchin, R., Bartley, B., & F’uller, D. (2002). Thinking geographically: Space, theory and contemporary human geography. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1994). Post-Fordism and the state. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader (pp. 251–259). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, A. E., & Ward, K. (2002). A world of regionalisms: Towards a US-UJK urban and regional policy framework comparison. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(4), 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latino Education Network Service. (2016). The great migration. Retrieved from http://palante.org/History.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., McMann, E., & Purcell, M. (2003). Space, scale, governance, and representation: Contemporary geographical perspectives on urban politics and policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. J. (2003). Framing space and time in the City: Urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2–3), 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global or local: “Globalization” and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Traces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, M. (2008). Smaller schools: A conflict of aims and purposes? FORUM: For Promoting 3–19 Comprehensive Education, 50(2), 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The ‘grammar’ of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, S. (2007). Reflective action in the academy: Exploring praxis in critical geography using a “food movement” case study. Antipode, 39(2), 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ares, N. (2017). Reterritorializing as Community Activism in an Urban Community-School Transformation Initiative. In: Ares, N., Buendía, E., Helfenbein, R. (eds) Deterritorializing/Reterritorializing. Breakthroughs in the Sociology of Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-977-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-977-5_5

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-977-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics