Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Methods That Matter: The Impact of Reflection, Dialogue, and Voice

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

In recent years, the field of community psychology has given considerable attention to how research and evaluation methods should be designed to support our goals of empowerment and social justice. Yet, as a field, we have given much less attention to whether the use of our methods actually achieves or supports our empowerment agenda. With the primary purpose of beginning to establish the norm of reporting on the impacts of our methods, this paper reports on the findings from interviews of 16 youth and adults who had participated in one participatory evaluation method (Photovoice). Two specific questions were examined: (1) What is the impact of participating in a Photovoice effort; and (2) How does the method of Photovoice foster these impacts? Overall, participants noted that they were significantly affected by their experiences as photographers and through their dialogue with neighbors during Photovoice group sessions. Impacts ranged from an increased sense of control over their own lives to the emergence of the kinds of awareness, relationships, and efficacy supportive of participants becoming community change agents. According to participants, Photovoice fostered these changes by (a) empowering them as experts on their lives and community, (b) fostering deep reflection, and (c) creating a context safe for exploring diverse perspectives. The implications of these findings for the science and practice of community psychology are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols& I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 7–40). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcazar, F. E., Taylor, R. R., & Kielhofner, G. W. (2004). Participatory action research (PAR): General principles and study with a chronic health condition. In L. Jason, C. B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. Taylor, & M. Davis, (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action. (pp. 17–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, H., Ford-Bilboe, M., Moutrey, B., & Cekic, S. (2001). Portraits of pain and promise: A photographic study of Bosnian youth. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 32, 21–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, A. A. (1999). People with serious mental illnesses using photovoice: Implications for participatory research and community education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Carmen, R. (1996). Autonomous development: Humanizing the landscape: An excursion into radical thinking and practice. London, England: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London, England: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, V., Duran, B., Baker, Q. E., Avila, M. M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). The dance of race and privilege in community based participatory research. In M. Minkler& N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 81–97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., Guijt, I., Welbourn, A. (1993). Acknowledging process: Challenges for agricultural research and methodology (IDS discussion paper No. 333). Brighton, England: Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (1969). Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined inquiry in education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, W. (1985). Portraits and dreams: Photographs and stories by children of the Appalachians. New York: Writers and Readers Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Fishman, P. G., Fitzgerald, K., Brandell, C., Nowell, B., Chavis, D., & Van Egeren, L. (under review). Building a community of possibility: The role of small wins and community organizing.

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, M. L. (2002). Picture this: Immigrant workers use photography for communication and change. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason& H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry& practice (pp. 70–80). London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W., & Mercer, S. L. (2001). Participatory research: Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1926–1929.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. (1990). Social and community intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 141–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jason, L., Keys, C., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Taylor, R., & Davis, M., (Eds.) (2004). Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G. (2003). Science and community psychology: Social norms for pluralistic inquiry. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 213–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. G., Moch, L. O., & Tandon, D. (2001). Collaborative inquiry with African American community leaders: Comments on a participatory action research process. In P. Reason& H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry& practice (pp. 348–355). London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K., & Van Vlaenderen, H. (1995). Evaluating participation processes in community development. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(4), 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killon, C., & Wang, C. C. (2000). Linking African American mothers across life stage and station through photovoice. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 11, 310–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingry-Westergaard, K., & Kelly, J. G. (1990). A contextualist epistemology for ecological research. In P. Tolan& Associates (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods (pp. 23–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Compte, M. (1995). Some notes on power, agenda, and voice: A researcher's person evolution toward critical collaborative research. In P. Mclaren& J. Giarelli (Eds.), Critical theory and education research (pp. 91–112). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykes, M. B. (2001). Creative arts and photography in participatory action research in Guatemala. In P. Reason& H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry& practice (pp. 363–371). London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankowski, E. S., & Rappaport, J. (2000). Narrative concepts and analysis in spiritually-based communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(5), 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M. (Ed.) (1997). Community organizing and community building for health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Introduction to community based participatory research. In M. Minkler& N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 3–26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, B., Berkowitz, S., Deacon, Z., & Foster-Fishman, P. (under review). Revealing the cues within community places: Stories of identity, history, and possibility.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research& evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. H., & Behrens, T. (2003). Working Pasteur's quadrant: Harnessing science and action for community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 219–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (2001). Value-based praxis in community psychology: Moving toward social justice and social action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 747–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P. Tolan& Associates (Eds.), Researching community psychology issues of theory and methods (pp. 51–63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 795–807.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1998). The art of social change: Community narratives as resources for individual and collective identity. In X. B. Arriaga& S. Oskamp (Eds.), Addressing community problems: Psychological research and interventions (pp. 225–246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (2000). Community narratives: Tales of terror and joy. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J., & Simkins, R. (1991). Healing and empowering through community narrative. Prevention in Human Services, 10(1), 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzer, M. S. (1998). Narrative approach to assessing interactions between society, community, and person. Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In Wyer, R. S., Jr. (Ed), Knowledge and memory: The real story (Vol. 8, pp. 1–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, L. (1999), Picturing concerns: The idea is to take the messages to policy makers and to produce change. Contra Costa Times, pp. A27, A32.

  • Stewart, E. (2000). Thinking through others: Qualitative research and community psychology. In J. Rappaport& E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 725–736). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donahue, P. (2003). Community based research and higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N. (1987). Empowerment education: Freire's ideas applied to youth. Youth Policy, 9, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A. (1999). Framing the evaluation of health and human service programs in community settings: Assessing progress. New Directions for Evaluation, 83, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women's health. Journal of Women's Health, 8(2), 185–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C. (2003). Using Photovoice as a participatory assessment and issue selection tool: A case study with the homeless in Ann Arbor. In M. Minkler& N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 179–196). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 171–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. (1997). Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education and Behavior, 24, 369–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., Burris, M., & Xiang, Y. P. (1996). Chinese village women as visual anthropologists: A participatory approach to reaching policymakers. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 1391–1400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., Cash, J. L., & Powers, L. S. (2000). Who knows the streets as well as the homeless? Promoting personal and community action through Photovoice. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A. W. (1987). Behavior setting reconsidered: Temporal stages, resources, internal dynamics, context. In D. Stokols& I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 613–653). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1998). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport& E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

    Pennie Foster-Fishman, Branda Nowell, Zermarie Deacon & Peggy McCann

  2. University of North Texas, Denton, Texas

    M. Angela Nievar

  3. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 125 D Psychology Building, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824

    Pennie Foster-Fishman

Authors
  1. Pennie Foster-Fishman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Branda Nowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zermarie Deacon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Angela Nievar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peggy McCann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pennie Foster-Fishman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foster-Fishman, P., Nowell, B., Deacon, Z. et al. Using Methods That Matter: The Impact of Reflection, Dialogue, and Voice. Am J Community Psychol 36, 275–291 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-8626-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-8626-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation