Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following anterior resection for rectal cancer demonstrate distinct characteristics and oncologic outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following rectal cancer surgery and their impact on long-term outcomes are not well documented. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of various types of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection in rectal cancer patients and evaluate their impact on the long-term oncologic outcomes.

Methods

This study analyzed data obtained from 2510 consecutive patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancers. Of these patients, 141 (5.6 %) developed anastomotic leakage. Three types of leakage were categorized according to presentation: generalized peritonitis (type I), localized peritonitis (type II), and fistula or chronic sinus (type III). The clinical characteristics and oncologic outcomes were compared.

Results

Type I leakage was the most common (I 44.7 %, n = 63; II 30.5 %, n = 43; III 24.8 %, n = 35). Type III occurred more frequently in women (p = 0.001) and patients with low rectal cancer (p < 0.001). Patients with type II or III leakage more frequently underwent radiation therapy (p < 0.001) and diverting ostomy (p < 0.001). Leakage management differed according to the type of leakage (p < 0.001). The local recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with type II and III leakage (p = 0.014).

Conclusions

The clinical characteristics and oncologic results are distinct for each type of anastomotic leakage. Only a type II or III leakage increases the risk of local recurrence. Each type of leakage should thus be considered a different disease entity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Merkel S, Wang WY, Schmidt O, Dworak O, Wittekind C, Hohenberger W et al (2001) Locoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 3:154–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F, Schubert D, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Study Group Colon/Rectum Carcinoma (Primary Tumour) (2007) Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 94:1548–1554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, Kim DD, Park IJ, Kim HC et al (2008) Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:902–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Påhlman L, Folkesson J et al (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96:1066–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2010) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 12:e76–e81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, Lindmark G (2011) Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival? Colorectal Dis 13:272–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith JD, Paty PB, Guillem JG, Temple LK, Weiser MR, Nash GM (2012) Anastomotic leak is not associated with oncologic outcome in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 256:1034–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chambers WM, Mortensen NJ (2004) Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:865–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I (2010) Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12, CD006878

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morgenstern L, Sanders G, Wahlstrom E, Yadegar J, Amodeo P (1984) Effect of preoperative irradiation on healing of low colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 147:246–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matthiessen P, Hansson L, Sjödahl R, Rutegård J (2010) Anastomotic-vaginal fistula (AVF) after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer-occurrence and risk factors. Colorectal Dis 12:351–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fermor B, Umpleby HC, Lever JV, Symes MO, Williamson RC (1986) Proliferative and metastatic potential of exfoliated colorectal cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 76:347–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS (2003) Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 90:215–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144:646–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Balkwill F, Mantovani A (2001) Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 357:539–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abramovitch R, Marikovsky M, Meir G, Neeman M (1999) Stimulation of tumour growth by wound-derived growth factors. Br J Cancer 79:1392–1398

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. François A, Milliat F, Guipaud O, Benderitter M (2013) Inflammation and immunity in radiation damage to the gut mucosa. Biomed Res Int 2013:123241

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ong ZY, Gibson RJ, Bowen JM, Stringer AM, Darby JM, Logan RM et al (2010) Pro-inflammatory cytokines play a key role in the development of radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis. Radiat Oncol 5:22

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest and funding sources

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Asanbyeongwon-gil 86, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, South Korea

    Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park & Jin Cheon Kim

Authors
  1. Seok-Byung Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chang Sik Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chan Wook Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong Sik Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. In Ja Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jin Cheon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seok-Byung Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, SB., Yu, C.S., Kim, C.W. et al. The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following anterior resection for rectal cancer demonstrate distinct characteristics and oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 1533–1540 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2359-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2359-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation