Skip to main content
Log in

The Direct Closure of the Internal Fistula Opening Without Advancement Flap for Transsphincteric Fistulas-in-Ano

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE:

The recommended closure techniques for transsphincteric fistulas demonstrate divergent results for postoperative continence and recurrence rates. An incontinence rate of 35 percent and a recurrence rate of up to 54 percent has been reported after transanal advancement techniques. The authors hypothesize that a direct closure of the internal fistula opening without tissue mobilization is easier to facilitate and generally leads to better clinical and functional results.

METHODS:

A prospective, observational study between 1995 and 1999 was undertaken in 90 patients with transsphincteric fistulas. A direct closure of the internal fistula opening without a flap was performed in all patients. A three-layer, nonstaggered closure of mucosa, submucosa, internal, and external anal sphincters was performed. The follow-up time periods ranged from one-half to six (median, 2.6) years and included assessment of fistula recurrence and continence using patients’ histories, physical examinations, proctoscopy, and continence scores. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test or chi-squared test.

RESULTS:

Data from 90 patients with a total of 106 operations were analyzed (65 males and 41 females; average age 46 (range, 22–78) years). Sixty-six patients had previous anorectal abscess surgery, and 41 had a previous fistula operation. The mean number of previous fistula operations was 1.7. All patients were continent before surgery. Mean elapsed operative time period was 37 ± 11 minutes, and the mean anal retraction time was 20 ± 7 minutes. Suture line dehiscence was the main postoperative complication. It was found to occur between the fourth and tenth postoperative days in 15 patients (14 percent). In 12 of 15 patients (80 percent), the fistula persisted and operative treatment was necessary. In three patients (20 percent), spontaneous closure took place. A recurrent fistula after wound healing was observed in seven patients (6.6 percent). The risk of developing a suture line dehiscence leading to a persistent fistula or a recurrent fistula was 22.5 percent. Ninety-four percent of the patients were continent (continence score 0), 6 percent had a minimal disorder of continence (score 4). A continence level for all patients was determined by the international classification of continence disorders.

CONCLUSIONS:

Direct closure for the treatment of transsphincteric fistulas is a safe and effective approach and achieves a good functional outcome; a small risk of suture line dehiscence, which may lead to a recurrent or persistent fistula, remains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. C Oh (1983) ArticleTitleManagement of high recurrent anal fistula Surgery 93 330–2

    Google Scholar 

  2. PS Aguilar G Plasencia TG Hardy SuffixJr RF Hartmann WR Stewart (1985) ArticleTitleMucosal advancement in the treatment of anal fistula Dis Colon Rectum 28 496–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. IT Jones VW Fazio DG Jagelman (1987) ArticleTitleThe use of transanal rectal advancement flaps in the management of fistulas involving the anorectum Dis Colon Rectum 30 919–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. J Wedell P Meier zu Eissen G Banzhaf L Kleine (1987) ArticleTitleSliding flap advancement for the treatment of high level fistulae Br J Surg 74 390–1

    Google Scholar 

  5. IJ Kodner A Mazor EI Shemesh RD Fry JW Fleshmen EH Birnbaum (1993) ArticleTitleEndorectal advancement flap repair of recto-vaginal and other complicated anorectal fistulas Surgery 114 682–90

    Google Scholar 

  6. R Hesterberg WU Schmidt F Mueller HD Roeher (1993) ArticleTitleTreatment of anovaginal fistulas with an anocutaneous flap in patients with Crohn’s disease Int J Colorectal Dis 8 51–4

    Google Scholar 

  7. DC Bartolo P Lewis (1990) ArticleTitleTreatment of trans-sphincteric fistulae by full thickness anorectal advancement flaps Br J Surg 77 1187–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. S Athanasiadis A Koehler M Nafe (1994) ArticleTitleTreatment of high anal fistulae by primary occlusion of the internal ostium, drainage of the intersphincteric space, and mucosal advancement flap Int J Colorectal Dis 9 153–7

    Google Scholar 

  9. WR Schouten DD Zimmermann JW Briel (1999) ArticleTitleTransanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas Dis Colon Rectum 42 1419–23

    Google Scholar 

  10. DD Zimmerman JW Briel MP Gosselink WR Schouten (2001) ArticleTitleAnocutaneous advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas Dis Colon Rectum 44 1474–80

    Google Scholar 

  11. S Willis M Rau V Schumpelick (2000) ArticleTitleThe use of transanal rectal advancement flaps in the management of complex anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas (in German) Chirurg 71 836–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. G Ozuner TL Hull J Cartmill VW Fazio (1996) ArticleTitleLong-term analysis of the use of transanal rectal advancement flaps for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistulas Dis Colon Rectum 39 10–4

    Google Scholar 

  13. J Garcia-Aguilar C Belmonte WD Wong SM Goldberg RD Madoff (1996) ArticleTitleAnal fistula surgery: factors associated with recurrence and incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 39 723–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. F Makowiec EC Jehle HD Becker M Starlinger (1995) ArticleTitleClinical course after transanal advancement flap repair of perianal fistula in patients with Crohn’s disease Br J Surg 82 603–6

    Google Scholar 

  15. N Mizrahi D Steven S Wexner et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEndorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45 1616–21

    Google Scholar 

  16. T Sonoda T Hull MR Piedmonte VW Fazio (2002) ArticleTitleOutcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap Dis Colon Rectum 45 1622–8

    Google Scholar 

  17. J Cintron J Park CP Orsay RK Pearl RL Nelson H Abcarian (1999) ArticleTitleRepair of fistulas-in-ano with autologous fibrin tissue adhesive Dis Colon Rectum 42 607–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. I Lindsey MM Smilgin-Humphreys C Cunningham NJ Mortensen BD George (2002) ArticleTitleA randomized, controlled trial of fibrin glue versus conventional treatment for anal fistula Dis Colon Rectum 45 1608–15

    Google Scholar 

  19. A Pino ParticleDel RL Nelson RK Pearl H Abcarian (1996) ArticleTitleIsland flap anoplasty for treatment of transsphincteric fistula-in-ano Dis Colon Rectum 39 224–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. D Matos PJ Lunniss RK Phillips (1993) ArticleTitleTotal sphincter conservation in high fistula-in-ano: results of a new approach Br J Surg 80 802–4

    Google Scholar 

  21. J Garcia-Aguilar C Belmonte DW Wong SM Goldberg RD Madoff (1998) ArticleTitleCutting seton versus two-stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistulas Br J Surg 85 243–5

    Google Scholar 

  22. S Athanasiadis N Lux N Fischbach B Meyer (1991) ArticleTitleOne-stage fistulectomy in the treatment of high transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas with internal sphincterotomy and closure of the internal fistula opening (in German) Chirurg 62 608–13

    Google Scholar 

  23. S Athanasiadis M Nafe A Köhler (1995) ArticleTitleTransanal rectal advancement flap vs. mucosal flap with suture of the internal sphincter muscle for the management of complicated anorectal fistulas. A prospective clinical and manometric study (in German) Langenbecks Arch Chir 380 31–6

    Google Scholar 

  24. A Köhler S Athanasiadis (1996) ArticleTitleAnocutaneous flaps as an alternative method of treatment to endorectal closure technique in the treatment of anal fistulae. A prospective study in 31 patients (in German) Chirurg 67 1244–50

    Google Scholar 

  25. JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97

    Google Scholar 

  26. RL Nelson J Cintron H Abcarian (2000) ArticleTitleDermal island-flap anoplasty for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: assessment of treatment failures Dis Colon Rectum 43 681–4

    Google Scholar 

  27. SH Jun GS Choi (1999) ArticleTitleAnocutaneous advancement flap closure of high anal fistulas Br J Surg 86 490–2

    Google Scholar 

  28. GV Miller PJ Finan (1998) ArticleTitleFlap advancement and core fistulectomy for complex rectal fistula Br J Surg 85 108–10

    Google Scholar 

  29. H Ortiz J Marzo (2000) ArticleTitleEndorectal flap advancement repair and fistulectomy for high transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas Br J Surg 87 1680–3

    Google Scholar 

  30. WG Lewis PJ Finan PJ Holdsworth PM Sagar BM Stephenson (1995) ArticleTitleClinical results and manometric studies after rectal flap advancement for infra-levator trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano Int J Colorectal Dis 10 189–92

    Google Scholar 

  31. ME Kreis EC Jehle M Ohlemann HD Becker MJ Starlinger (1998) ArticleTitleFunctional results after transanal rectal advancement flap repair of trans-sphincteric fistula Br J Surg 85 240–2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sotirios Athanasiadis M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Athanasiadis, S., Helmes, C., Yazigi, R. et al. The Direct Closure of the Internal Fistula Opening Without Advancement Flap for Transsphincteric Fistulas-in-Ano. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1174–1180 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0551-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0551-x

Key words

Navigation