Abstract
Parameter calibration is one of the most problematic phases of numerical modeling since the choice of parameters affects the model’s reliability as far as the physical problems being studied are concerned. In some cases, laboratory tests or physical models evaluating model parameters cannot be completed and other strategies must be adopted; numerical models reproducing debris flow propagation are one of these. Since scale problems affect the reproduction of real debris flows in the laboratory or specific tests used to determine rheological parameters, calibration is usually carried out by comparing in a subjective way only a few parameters, such as the heights of soil deposits calculated for some sections of the debris flows or the distance traveled by the debris flows using the values detected in situ after an event has occurred. Since no automatic or objective procedure has as yet been produced, this paper presents a numerical procedure based on the application of a statistical algorithm, which makes it possible to define, without ambiguities, the best parameter set. The procedure has been applied to a study case for which digital elevation models of both before and after an important event exist, implicating that a good database for applying the method was available. Its application has uncovered insights to better understand debris flows and related phenomena.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbieri, G. et al (1980). Carta geologica dell’area di Recoaro. Padova, 1980. Mem. Sc. Geol. XXXIV. [in Italian]
Baù D et al (2015) Ensemble smoothing of land subsidence measurements for reservoir geomechanical characterization. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 39:207–228. doi:10.1002/nag.2309
Bertolo P, Wieczorek F (2005) Calibration of numerical models for small debris flows in Yosemite Valley, California, USA. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 5:993–1001. doi:10.5194/nhess-5-993-2005
Bossi G et al (2015a) Multi-temporal LiDAR-DTMs as a tool for modelling a complex landslide: a case study in the Rotolon catchment (eastern Italian Alps). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:715–722. doi:10.5194/nhess-15-715-2015
Bossi G et al (2015b) The Rotolon catchment early-warning system. Eng Geol Soc Territory 3:91–95. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09054-2
Capparelli G, Versace P (2011) FLaIR and SUSHI: two mathematical models for early warning of landslides induced by rainfal. Landslides 8:67–79. doi:10.1007/s10346-010-0228-6
Cavalli M, Tarolli P (2011) Application of LiDAR technology for rivers analysis. Ital J Eng Geol and Environ, Special Issue(1), pp.33-44. DOI: 10.4408/IJEGE.2011-01.S-03
Cleary PW, Prakash M (2004) Discrete-element modelling and smoothed particle hydrodynamics: potential in the environmental sciences. Philos Trans R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci 362(1822):2003–2030. doi:10.1098/rsta.2004.1428
Cola S, Bossi G, Munari S, Brezzi L, Marcato G (2014) Applicability of two propagation models to simulate the Rotolon earth-flow occurred in November 2010. XII International IAEG Congress 2:1683–1687. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_299
Cola S, Calabrò N, Simonini P, Pastor M (2013) Effects of grain-size composition examined in laboratory and numerical tests on artificial mud-flows. Landsl Sci Pract 3(2):319–325. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31310-3_43
De Zanche V, Mietto, P (1981) Review of the Triassic sequence of Recoaro (Italy) and related problems. Padova, 1981. Rend. Soc. Geol. It
Eckhardt K, Arnold JG (2001) Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model. J Hydrol 251(1-2):103–109. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00429-2
Evensen G (2003) The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn 53(4):343–367. doi:10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9
Frigerio S et al (2014) A web-based platform for automatic and continuous landslide monitoring: the Rotolon (Eastern Italian Alps) case study. Comput Geosci 63:96–105. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.015
Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2008) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris-flow: an update. Landslides 5(1):3–17. doi:10.1007/s10346-007-0112-1
Hungr O (1995) A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches. Can Geotech J 32(4):610–623. doi:10.1139/t95-063
Hürlimann M, Rickenmann D, Medina V, Bateman A (2008) Evaluation of approaches to calculate debris-flow parameters for hazard assessment. Eng Geol 102(3-4):152–163. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.012
Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35(3):245. doi:10.1029/97RG00426
Lacasse S, Nadim F (2009) Landslide risk assessment and mitigation strategy. Landslides - Disaster Risk Reduction, pp.31-62. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_3.
Liu GR, Liu, MB (2003) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a meshfree particle method. World Scientific. ISBN: 9812564403, 9789812564405.
Liu MB, Liu GR (2010) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments. Arch Comput Meth Eng 17(1):25–76. doi:10.1007/s11831-010-9040-7
McDougall S, Hungr O (2004) A model for the analysis of rapid landslide motion across three-dimensional terrain. Can Geotech J 41(6):1084–1097. doi:10.1139/t04-052
McDougall S, Hungr O (2005) Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides. Can Geotech J 42(5):1437–1448. doi:10.1139/t05-064
Monaghan JJ (1992) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 30:543–574. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551
Pastor M et al (2014) Application of a SPH depth-integrated model to landslide run-out analysis. Landslides 11:793–812. doi:10.1007/s10346-014-0484-y
Pastor M et al (2008) A depth-integrated, coupled SPH model for flow-like landslides and related phenomena. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 33(2):143–172. doi:10.1002/nag.705
Pirulli M, (2005) Numerical modelling of landslide runout, a continuum mechanics approach. Ph.D. Degree in Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino (Italy)
Pirulli M, Pastor M (2012) Numerical study on the entrainment of bed material into rapid landslides. Geotechnique 62(11):959–972. doi:10.1680/geot.10.P.074
Pirulli M, Sorbino G (2008) Assessing potential debris flow runout: a comparison of two simulation models. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 8(4):961–971. doi:10.5194/nhess-8-961-2008
Pudasaini SP, Wang Y, Hutter K (2005) Modelling debris flows down general channels. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5(6):799–819. doi:10.5194/nhess-5-799-2005
Quan Luna B et al (2011) The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 11:2047–2060. doi:10.5194/nhess-11-2047-2011
Revellino P, Hungr O, Guadagno FM, Evans SG (2004) Velocity and runout simulation of destructive debris flows and debris avalanches in pyroclastic deposits, Campania region, Italy. Environ Geol 45:295–311. doi:10.1007/s00254-003-0885-z
Robinson AR, Wastald LJ (1987) The Harvard open ocean model: calibration and application to dynamical process, forecasting, and data assimilation studies. Appl Numer Math 3(1-2):89–131. doi:10.1016/0168-9274(87)90008-0
Schädler W, Borgatti L, Corsini A, Meier J, Ronchetti F, Schanz T (2015) Geomechanical assessment of the Corvara earthflow through numerical modelling and inverse analysis. Landslides 12(3):495–510. doi:10.1007/s10346-014-0498-5
Sosio R, Crosta G, Hungr O (2008) Complete dynamic modeling calibration for the Thurwieser rock avalanche (Italian Central Alps). Eng Geol 100(1-2):11–26. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.02.012
Takahashi, T (2014) Debris flow: mechanics, prediction and countermeasures. 2nd ed. ISBN: 1138000078, 9781138000070
Trivelli G (1991) Storia del territorio e delle genti di Recoaro. Istituto Geografico De Agostini, Novara [in Italian]
Voellmy A (1955) Über die Zerstörungskraft von Lawinen. Schweiz Bauzeitung 73:159–285
Wu Y-H, Liu K-F, Chen Y-C (2013) Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the application of assessment of granular debris flow hazards with case study. J Mt Sci 10(2):293–304. doi:10.1007/s11629-013-2511-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brezzi, L., Bossi, G., Gabrieli, F. et al. A new data assimilation procedure to develop a debris flow run-out model. Landslides 13, 1083–1096 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0625-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0625-y