Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to seismically triggered slow-moving earth slides

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to develop an efficient analytical method for assessing the vulnerability of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings subjected to seismically induced slow-moving earth slides. Vulnerability is defined in terms of probabilistic fragility curves, which describe the probability of exceeding a certain limit state of the building, on a given slope, versus the Peak Horizontal Ground Acceleration (PHGA) at the assumed “seismic bedrock”, allowing for the quantification of various sources of uncertainty. The proposed method is based on a two-step, uncoupled approach. In the first step, the differential permanent landslide displacements at the building’s foundation level are estimated using a dynamic non-linear finite difference slope model. In the second step, the calculated differential permanent displacements are statically imposed at the foundation level to assess the building’s response to differing permanent seismic ground displacements using a finite element code. Structural limit states are defined in terms of threshold values of strains for the reinforced concrete structural components. The method is applied to typical low-rise reinforced concrete frame buildings on shallow foundations with varying strength and stiffness characteristics (isolated footings and continuous slab foundation), standing near the crest of a relatively slow-moving earth slide. Two different slope models are selected representing a cohesive and a purely frictional soil material. The paper describes the method and the derived fragility curves for the selected building and slope typologies that could be used in quantitative risk assessment studies at site-specific and local scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGSO (2001) Natural hazards and the risk they pose to South-East Queenland. AGSO-Geoscience Australia. Digital report on CD-ROM, 389 pp

  • Assimaki D, Kausel E (2007) Modified topographic amplification factors for a single-faced slope due to kinematic soil-structure interaction. J Geotech Geoenviron 133:1414–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird JF, Bommer JJ (2004) Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Eng Geol 75:147–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird JF, Crowley H, Pinho R, Bommer JJ (2005) Assessment of building response to liquefaction induced differential ground deformation. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 38(4):215–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird JF, Bommer JJ, Crowley H, Pinho R (2006) Modelling liquefaction-induced building damage in earthquake loss estimation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(1):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckovalas GD, Papadimitriou AG (2005) Numerical evaluation of slope topography effects on seismic ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau C, Havenith HB, Fleurisson JA, Grandjean AG (2004) Numerical modelling of seismic slope stability, engineering geology for infrastructure planning in Europe. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg 104:671–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Travasarou T (2007) Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. J Geotech Geoenviron 133(4):381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L, Bonnard Ch, Corominas J, Jibson R, Montero-Olarte J (2005) Landslide hazard and risk zoning for urban planning and development. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberthardt E (eds) Landslide risk management. Taylor and Francis, London, p 199–235

  • CEN-European Committee for Standardization (2003) prENV 1998-1—Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Draft No. 4, Brussels, Belgium

  • Crowley H, Pinho R, Bommer JJ (2004) A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation. Bull Earthq Eng 2(2):173–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cundall PA, Hansteen H, Lacasse S, Selnes PB (1980) NESSI—soil structure interaction programme for dynamic and static problems. Report 51508-9, December, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EAK2000 (2000) Greek Seismic Code, Organization of Seismic Planning and Protection

  • Fotopoulou S, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2011) Physical vulnerability of RC buildings to seismically induced Earth slides. 2nd World Landslide Forum, Rome

  • Galli M, Guzzetti F (2007) Vulnerability to landslides in Umbria, central Italy. Environ Manag 40:649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T (2003) Vulnerability assessment in landslide risk analysis. Beitr Erdsystemforschung 134(2):123–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinimann HR (1999) Risikoanalyse bei gravitativen Naturgefahren–Fallbeispiele und Daten. Umwelt-Materialen 107/II, Bern

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behaviour in Earthquake geotechnics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group Inc (2008) FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua), ver. 6.0. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW, Jibson MW (2003) Java programs for using Newmark's method and simplified decoupled analysis to model slope performance during earthquakes. US Geological Survey Open File Report: 03-005

  • Kaynia AM, Papathoma-Köhle M, Neuhäuser B, Ratzinger K, Wenzel H, Medina-Cetina Z (2008) Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide: application to the village of Lichtenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Eng Geol 101:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL, Stewart JP (2004) Geotechnical aspects of seismic hazards. In: Earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, Bozorgnia Y, Bertero V (Eds.), CRC Press 4, pp85

  • Ktenidou O.-J (2010) Theoretical and instrumental study of site and topographic effects on strong ground motion in Aegion. Ph.D. thesis, Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Leone F, Aste JP, Leroi E (1996) Vulnerability assessment of elements exposed to mass moving: working towards a better risk perception. In: Senneset K (ed) Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Nadim F, Huang H, Uzielli M, Lacasse S (2010) Quantitative vulnerability estimation for scenario-based landslide hazards. Landslides 7:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysmer J, Kuhlemeyer RL (1969) Finite dynamic model for infinite media. J Eng Mech 95:859–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour MF, Morgenstern NR., Martin CD (2010) Expected damage from displacement of slow-moving slides. Landslides: 1–15

  • Margaris B, Athanasopoulos G, Mylonakis G, Papaioannou C, Klimis N, Theodulidis N, Savvaidis A, Efthymiadou V, Stewart JP (2010) The 8 June 2008 Mw6.4 Achaia–Elia, Greece earthquake: source characteristics, ground motions, and ground failure. Earthquake Spectra 26(2):399–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrouli O, Corominas J (2010) Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings in front of the rockfall impact. Landslides 7(2):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejia LH, Dawson EM (2006) Earthquake deconvolution for FLAC. Proc. 4th International FLAC Symposium, Madrid, Spain, 211–219

  • National Institute of Building Sciences (2004) Direct physical damage—general building stock. HAZUS-MH Technical manual, Chapter 5. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Negulescu C, Foerster E (2010) Parametric studies and quantitative assessment of the vulnerability of a RC frame building exposed to differential settlements. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1781–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 15:139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng WF, Wang CL, Chen ST, Lee ST (2009) Incorporating the effects of topographic amplification and sliding areas in the modeling of earthquake-induced landslide hazards, using the cumulative displacement method. Comput Geosci 35(5):946–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis K (2010) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Ziti Publications (in Greek)

  • Pitilakis D, Tsinaris A (2010) Soil-foundation-structure interaction close to natural slopes and topographic irregularities (In Greek). In: Proc of the 6th National Conference of Geotechnical Engineering, Volos, Greece

  • Rathje EM, Bray JD (2000) Nonlinear coupled seismic slidinganalysis of earth structures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(11):1002–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remondo J, Bonachea J, Cendrero A (2008) Quantitative landslide risk assessment and mapping on the basis of recent occurrences. Geomorphol 94:496–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SeismoSoft, SeismoStruct (2010) A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Available from URL: www.seismosoft.com

  • Spencer E (1967) A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel inter-slice forces. Geotechnique 17(1):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzielli M, Nadim F, Lacasse S, Kaynia AM (2008) A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides. Eng Geol 102:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Env 65:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y, Wang F, Sun P (2009) Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China. Landslides 6:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zêzere J, Garcia RAC, Oliveira SC, Reis E (2008) Probabilistic landslide risk analysis considering direct costs in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal). Geomorphol 94:467–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was supported by the project SafeLand “Living with landslide risk in Europe: Assessment, effects of global change, and risk management strategies” under grant agreement no. 226479 in the 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of Soil Mechanics, Foundations and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece

    S D Fotopoulou & K D Pitilakis

Authors
  1. S D Fotopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K D Pitilakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S D Fotopoulou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fotopoulou, S.D., Pitilakis, K.D. Vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to seismically triggered slow-moving earth slides. Landslides 10, 563–582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0345-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0345-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation