Abstract
There is actually an intense research in ethanol dry reforming because bioethanol and carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, can be converted into syngas and, in turn, into chemicals and energy such as dihydrogen (H2). Here we review dry reforming of ethanol with focus on thermodynamics, catalysts and effect of operating conditions. Noble metal-based catalysts typically exhibit both ethanol and CO2 conversions above 85% in the range of 923‒1073 K, yet the high cost of precious metals has restrained their potential applications. H2 yield of 90% and above is achieved at 1073 K or above due to the endothermic nature of ethanol dry reforming. Improving catalytic performance and inhibiting coke formation may be achieved by using bimetallic catalysts and other types of metal oxides.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DRIFTS:
-
Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy
- GHSV:
-
Gas hourly space velocity
References
Abdulrasheed A, Jalil AA, Gambo Y, Ibrahim M, Hambali HU, Hamid MYS (2019) A review on catalyst development for dry reforming of methane to syngas: recent advances. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 108:175–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.054
Abou Rjeily M, Gennequin C, Pron H, Abi-Aad E, Randrianalisoa JH (2021) Pyrolysis-catalytic upgrading of bio-oil and pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of biogas: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:2825–2872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01190-2
Al-Doghachi FAJ, Rashid U, Taufiq-Yap YH (2016) Investigation of Ce(III) promoter effects on the tri-metallic Pt, Pd, Ni/MgO catalyst in dry-reforming of methane. RSC Adv 6:10372–10384. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA25869C
Alvarez-Galvan MC, Navarro RM, Rosa F, Briceno Y, Alvarez FG, Fierro JLG (2008) Performance of La, Ce-modified alumina-supported Pt and Ni catalysts for the oxidative reforming of diesel hydrocarbons. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:652–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.10.023
Aramouni NAK, Touma JG, Tarboush BA, Zeaiter J, Ahmad MN (2018) Catalyst design for dry reforming of methane: analysis review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:2570–2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.076
Artrith N, Lin Z, Chen JG (2020) Predicting the activity and selectivity of bimetallic metal catalysts for ethanol reforming using machine learning. ACS Catal 10:9438–9444. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02089
Bahari MB, Phuc NHH, Abdullah B, Alenazey F, Vo DVN (2015) Ethanol dry reforming for syngas production over Ce-promoted Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. J Environ Chem Eng 4:4930–4938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.01.038
Bahari MB, Phuc NHH, Alenazey F, Vu KB, Ainirazali N, Vo DVN (2017) Catalytic performance of La-Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for CO2 reforming of ethanol. Catal Today 291:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.02.019
Barona M, Snurr RQ (2020) Exploring the tunability of trimetallic MOF nodes for partial oxidation of methane to methanol. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:28217–28231. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c06241
Bartholomew CH (2001) Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Appl Catal Gen 212:17–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00843-7
Bartholomew CH, Argyle MD (2015) Advances in catalyst deactivation and regeneration. Catal 5:949–954. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal5020949
Bej B, Pradhan NC, Neogi S (2013) Production of hydrogen by steam reforming of methane over alumina supported nano-NiO/SiO2 catalyst. Catal Today 207:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.04.011
Bej B, Bepari S, Pradhan NC, Neogi S (2017) Production of hydrogen by dry reforming of ethanol over alumina supported nano-NiO/SiO2 catalyst. Catal Today 291:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.12.010
Bellido JDA, Tanabe EY, Assaf EM (2009) Carbon dioxide reforming of ethanol over Ni/Y2O3-ZrO2. Appl Catal B 90:485–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.04.009
Bepari S, Kuila D (2020) Steam reforming of methanol, ethanol and glycerol over nickel-based catalysts-A review. Int J Hydr Energy 45:18090–18113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.003
Blanchard J, Oudghiri-Hassani H, Abatzoglou N, Jankhah S, Gitzhofer F (2008) Synthesis of nanocarbons via ethanol dry reforming over a carbon steel catalyst. Chem Eng J 143:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.04.012
Bosko ML, Ferreira N, Catena A, Moreno MS, Múnera JF, Cornaglia L (2018) Catalytic behavior of Ru nanoparticles supported on carbon fibers for the ethanol steam reforming reaction. Catal Commun 114:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2018.05.019
Budiman AW, Song SH, Chang TS, Shin CH, Choi MJ (2012) Dry reforming of methane over cobalt catalysts: a literature review of catalyst development. Catal Surv Asia 16:183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10563-012-9143-2
Cai W, Dong J, Chen Q, Xu T, Zhai S, Liu X, Cui L, Zhang S (2020) One-pot microwave-assisted synthesis of Cu-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 with flower-like morphology: enhanced stability for ethanol dry reforming. Adv Powder Technol 31:3874–3881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.07.032
Cao Y, Gao Z, Jin J, Zhou H, Cohron M, Zhao H, Pan W (2008) Synthesis gas production with an adjustable H2/CO ratio through the coal gasification process: effects of coal ranks and methane addition. Energy Fuels 22:1720–1730. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef7005707
Cao D, Zeng F, Zhao Z, Cai W, Li Y, Yu H, Zhang S, Qu F (2018) Cu based catalysts for syngas production from ethanol dry reforming: effect of oxide supports. Fuel 219:406–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.096
Cifuentes A, Torres R, Llorca J (2020) Modelling of the ethanol steam reforming over Rh-Pd/CeO2 catalytic wall reactors. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:26265–26273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.034
Da Silva AM, de Souza KR, Jacobs G, Graham UM, Davis BH, Mattos LV, Noronha FB (2011) Steam and CO2 reforming of ethanol over Rh/CeO2 catalyst. Appl Catal B 102:94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.11.030
Dang C, Wu S, Yang G, Cao Y, Wang H, Peng F, Yu H (2020) Syngas production by dry reforming of the mixture of glycerol and ethanol with CaCO3. J Energy Chem 43:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.08.002
De Araujo GC, Lima S, Rangel MDC, La Parola V, Peña MA, García Fierro JL (2005) Characterization of precursors and reactivity of LaNi1-xCoxO3 for the partial oxidation of methane. Catal Today 107–108:906–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.044
De Oliveira-Vigier K, Abatzoglou N, Gitzhofer F (2005) Dry-reforming of ethanol in the presence of a 316 stainless steel catalyst. Can J Chem Eng 83:978–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450830607
Dinh KT, Sullivan MM, Narsimhan K, Serna P, Meyer RJ, Dincă M, Román-Leshkov Y, (2019) Continuous partial oxidation of methane to methanol catalyzed by diffusion-paired copper dimers in copper-exchanged zeolites. J Am Chem Soc 141:11641–11650. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b04906
Dong K, Hochman G, Timilsina GR (2020) Do drivers of CO2 emission growth alter overtime and by the stage of economic development? Energy Policy 140:111420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111420
Dos Santos RG, Alencar AC (2020) Biomass-derived syngas production via gasification process and its catalytic conversion into fuels by Fischer Tropsch synthesis: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:18114–18132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.133
Drif A, Bion N, Brahmi R, Ojala S, Pirault-Roy L, Turpeinen E, Epron F (2015) Study of the dry reforming of methane and ethanol using Rh catalysts supported on doped alumina. Appl Catal A 504:576–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.02.019
Ebiad MA, Abd El-Hafiz DR, Elsalamony RA, Mohamed LS (2012) Ni supported high surface area CeO2–ZrO2 catalysts for hydrogen production from ethanol steam reforming. RSC Adv 2:8145–8156. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RA20258A
Fayaz F, Danh HT, Nguyen-Huy C, Vu KB, Abdullah B, Vo DVN (2016) Promotional effect of Ce-dopant on Al2O3-supported Co catalysts for syngas production via CO2 reforming of ethanol. Procedia Eng 148:646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.530
Fayaz F, Bach LG, Bahari MB, Nguyen TD, Vu KB, Kanthasamy R, Samart C, Nguyen-Huy C, Vo DVN (2019) Stability evaluation of ethanol dry reforming on Lanthania-doped cobalt-based catalysts for hydrogen-rich syngas generation. Int J Energy Res 43:405–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4274
Foo SY, Cheng CK, Nguyen TH, Adesina AA (2011) Evaluation of lanthanide-group promoters on Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for CH4 dry reforming. J Mol Catal A Chem 344:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2011.04.018
Foo SY, Cheng CK, Nguyen TH, Kennedy EM, Dlugogorski BZ, Adesina AA (2012) Carbon deposition and gasification kinetics of used lanthanide-promoted Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalysts from CH4 dry reforming. Catal Commun 26:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2012.06.003
Ghenciu AF (2002) Review of fuel processing catalysts for hydrogen production in PEM fuel cell systems. Curr Opin Solid St M 6:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00108-0
Goula MA, Charisiou ND, Papageridis KN, DelimitisA PE, Iliopoulou EF (2015) Nickel on alumina catalysts for the production of hydrogen rich mixtures via the biogas dry reforming reaction: influence of the synthesis method. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:9183–9200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.129
Heidlage MG, Kezar EA, Snow KC, Pfromm PH (2017) Thermochemical synthesis of ammonia and syngas from natural gas at atmospheric pressure. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:14014–14024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03173
Hou T, Zhang S, Chen Y, Wang D, Cai W (2015a) Hydrogen production from ethanol reforming: catalysts and reaction mechanism. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:132–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.023
Hou T, Lei Y, Zhang S, Zhang J, Cai W (2015b) Ethanol dry reforming for syngas production over Ir/CeO2 catalyst. J Rare Earths 33:42–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60381-1
Hu X, Lu G (2009) Syngas production by CO2 reforming of ethanol over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. Catal Commun 10:1633–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2009.04.030
Hu Q, Shen Y, Chew JW, Ge T, Wang CH (2020) Chemical looping gasification of biomass with Fe2O3/CaO as the oxygen carrier for hydrogen-enriched syngas production. Chem Eng J 379:122346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122346
IEA (2020) Outlook for energy demand. In: World Energy Outlook 2020. IEA Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020. Accessed 31 Mar 2021
Jankhah S, Abatzoglou N, Gitzhofer F (2008) Thermal and catalytic dry reforming and cracking of ethanol for hydrogen and carbon nanofilaments production. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:4769–4779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.058
Kale GR, Gaikwad TM (2014) Thermodynamic analysis of ethanol dry reforming: effect of combined parameters. ISRN Thermodyn. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/929676
Kale GR, Kulkarni BD (2014) Thermoneutral conditions in dry reforming of ethanol. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 2:196–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.1759
Khan AN, En X, Raza MY, Khan NA, Ali A (2020) Sectorial study of technological progress and CO2 emission: insights from a developing economy. Technol Forecast Soc Change 151:119862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119862
Kourtelesis M, Moraes TS, Mattos LV, Niakolas DK, Noronha FB, Verykios X (2021) The effects of support morphology on the performance of Pt/CeO2 catalysts for the low temperature steam reforming of ethanol. Appl Catal b: Environ 284:119757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119757
Koytsoumpa EI, Bergins C, Kakaras E (2018) The CO2 economy: review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies. J Supercrit Fluids 132:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029
Kumar A, Bhosale RR, Malik SS, Abusrafa AE, Saleh MAH, Ghosh UK, Al-Marri MJ, Almomani FA, Khader MM, Abu-Reesh IM (2016) Thermodynamic investigation of hydrogen enrichment and carbon suppression using chemical additives in ethanol dry reforming. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:15149–15157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.157
Levin BD, Chahine R (2010) Challenges for renewable hydrogen production from biomass. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:4962–4969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.067
Li H, Henkelman G (2017) Dehydrogenation selectivity of ethanol on close-packed transition metal surfaces: a computational study of monometallic, Pd/Au, and Rh/Au catalysts. J Phys Chem C 121:27504–27510. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09953
Li M, Hua B, Luo JL (2017) Alternative fuell cell technologies for cogenerating electrical power and syngas from greenhouse gases. ACS Energy Lett 2:1789–1796. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00392
Li MR, Song YY, Wang GC (2019) The mechanism of steam-ethanol reforming on Co13/CeO2–x: a DFT study. ACS Catal 9:2355–2367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b03765
Li H, Jia X, Wang N, Chen B, Xie X, Wang Q, Huang L (2020) Auto-thermal reforming of acetic acid over hydrotalcites-derived co-based catalyst: a stable and anti-coking Co/Sr-Alx-O catalyst. Appl Catal b: Environ 267:118370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118370
Liu Y, Lu F, Tang Y, Liu M, Tao FF, Zhang Y (2020) Effects of initial crystal structure of Fe2O3 and Mn promoter on effective active phase for syngas to light olefins. Appl Catal b: Environl 261:118219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118219
López Ortiz A, Pallares Sámano RB, Meléndez Zaragoza MJ, Collins-Martínez V (2015) Thermodynamic analysis and process simulation for the H2 production by dry reforming of ethanol with CaCO3. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:17172–17179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.115
Lozano FJ, Lozano R (2018) Assessing the potential sustainability benefits of agricultural residues: biomass conversion to syngas for energy generation or to chemicals production. J Clean Prod 172:4162–4169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.037
Mattos LV, Jacobs G, Davis BH, Noronha FB (2012) Production of hydrogen from ethanol: review of reaction mechanism and catalyst deactivation. Chem Rev 112:4094–4123. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2000114
Menon V, Rao M (2012) Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: biofuels, platform chemicals and biorefinery concept. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:522–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2012.02.002
Minh DP, Siang TJ, Vo DVN, Phan TS, Ridart C, Nzihou A, Grouset D (2018) Hydrogen production from biogas reforming: an overview of steam reforming, dry reforming, dual reforming, and tri-reforming of methane. In: Azzaro-Pantel C (ed) Hydrogen supply chains. Academic Press, London, pp 111–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811197-0.00004-X
Minh DP, Pham XH, Siang TJ, Vo DVN (2021) Review on the catalytic tri-reforming of methane-Part I: impact of operating conditions, catalyst deactivation and regeneration. Appl Catal a: Gen 621:118202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2021.118202
Moraes TS, Neto RCR, Ribeiro MC, Mattos LV, Kourtelesis M, Ladas S, Verykios X, Noronha FB (2016) Ethanol conversion at low temperature over CeO2—Supported Ni-based catalysts. Effect of Pt addition to Ni catalyst. Appl Catal b Environ 181:754–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.044
Nanda S, Rana R, Zheng Y, Kozinski JA, Dalai AK (2017) Insights on pathways for hydrogen generation from ethanol. Sust Energy Fuels 1:1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SE00212B
Ni M, Leung DYC, Leung MKH (2007) A review on reforming bio-ethanol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 32:3238–3247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.038
Nozawa T, Mizukoshi Y, Yoshida A, Naito S (2014) Aqueous phase reforming of ethanol and acetic acid over TiO2 supported Ru catalysts. Appl Catal b: Environ 146:221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.06.017
Oemar U, Kathiraser Y, Mo L, Ho XK, Kawi S (2016) CO2 reforming of methane over highly active La-promoted Ni supported on SBA-15 catalysts: mechanism and kinetic modelling. Catal Sci Technol 6:1173–1186. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CY00906E
Ogo S, Sekine Y (2020) Recent progress in ethanol steam reforming using non-noble transition metal catalysts: a review. Fuel Process Technol 199:106238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106238
Omoregbe O, Danh HT, Nguyen-Huy C, Setiabudi HD, Abidin SZ, Truong QD, Vo DVN (2017) Syngas production from methane dry reforming over Ni/SBA-15 catalyst: effect of operating parameters. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:11283–11294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.146
Osman AI, Mehta N, Elgarahy AM, Al-Hinai A, Al-Muhtaseb AAH, Rooney DW (2021) Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:4075–4118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01273-0
Osorio-Vargas P, Flores-González NA, Navarro RM, Fierro JLG, Campos CH, Reyes P (2015) Improved stability of Ni/Al2O3 catalysts by effect of promoters (La2O3, CeO2) for ethanol steam-reforming reaction. Catal Today 259:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.04.037
Owgi AHK, Jalil AA, Hussain I, Hassan NS, Hambali HU, Siang TJ, Vo DVN (2021) Catalytic systems for enhanced carbon dioxide reforming of methane: a review. Environ Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01164-w
Pattnaik F, Tripathi S, Patra BR, Nanda S, Kumar V, Dalai AK, Naik S (2021) Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic polysaccharides to commodity biochemicals: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:4119–4136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01284-x
Pham TP, Ro KS, Chen L, Mahajan D, Siang TJ, Ashik UPM et al (2020) Microwave-assisted dry reforming of methane for syngas production: a review. Environ Chem Lett 18:1987–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01055-0
Qin Z, Chen J, Xie X, Luo X, Su T, Ji H (2020) CO2 reforming of CH4 to syngas over nickel-based catalysts. Environ Chem Lett 18:997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-00996-w
Qu F, Wei Y, Cai W, Yu H, Li Y, Zhang S, Li C (2018) Syngas production from carbon dioxide reforming of ethanol over Ir/Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 catalyst: Effect of calcination temperatures. Energy Fuels 32:2104–2116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03945
Rostrup-Nielsen JR (1993) Production of synthesis gas. Catal Today 18:305–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(93)80059-A
Salge JR, Deluga GA, Schmidt LD (2005) Catalytic partial oxidation of ethanol over noble metal catalysts. J Catal 235:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.07.021
Sansaniwal SK, Pal K, Rosen MA, Tyagi SK (2017) Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:363–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.038
Shafiqah MNN, Tran HN, Nguyen TD, Phuong PT, Abdullah B, Lam SS, Nguyen-Tri P, Kumar R, Nanda S, Vo DVN (2020) Ethanol CO2 reforming on La2O3 and CeO2-promoted Cu/Al2O3 catalysts for enhanced hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:18398–18410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.024
Sharma YC, Kumar A, Prasad R, Upadhyay SN (2017) Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production: latest and effective catalyst modification strategies to minimize carbonaceous deactivation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.049
Siang TJ, Jalil AA, Hamid MYS, Abdulrasheed AA, Abdullah TAT, Vo DV (2020a) Role of oxygen vacancies in dendritic fibrous M/KCC-1 (M= Ru, Pd, Rh) catalysts for methane partial oxidation to H2-rich syngas production. Fuel 278:118360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118360
Siang TJ, Jalil AA, Abdulrasheed AA, Hambali HU, Nabgan W (2020b) Thermodynamic equilibrium study of altering methane partial oxidation for Fischer-Tropsch synfuel production. Energy 198:117394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117394
Siang TJ, Jalil AA, Abdulrahman A, Hambali HU (2021) Enhanced carbon resistance and regenerability in methane partial oxidation to syngas using oxygen vacancy-rich fibrous Pd, Ru and Rh/KCC-1 catalysts. Environ Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01192-0
Sircar S, Golden TC (2000) Purification of hydrogen by pressure swing adsorption. Sep Sci Technol 35:667–687. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-100100183
Spallina V, Matturro G, Ruocco C, Meloni E, Palma V, Fernandez E, Gallucci F (2018) Direct route from ethanol to pure hydrogen through autothermal reforming in a membrane reactor: experimental demonstration, reactor modelling and design. Energy 143:666–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.031
Srivastava RK, Shetti NP, Reddy KR, Aminabhavi TM (2020) Biofuels, biodiesel and biohydrogen production using bioprocesses. A review. Environ Chem Lett 18:1049–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-00999-7
Sun Z, Chen Z, Toan S, Sun Z (2020) Chemical looping deoxygenated gasification: an implication for efficient biomass utilization with high-quality syngas modulation and CO2 reduction. Energy Conv Manag 215:112913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112913
Tormena MM, Pontes RM (2020) A DFT/EDA study of ethanol decomposition over Pt, Cu and Rh metal clusters. Mol Catal 482:110694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2019.110694
Waheed A, Wang X, Maeda N, Naito S, Baiker A (2019) Surface processes occurring during aqueous phase ethanol reforming on Ru/TiO2 tracked by ATR-IR spectroscopy. Appl Catal a Gen 581:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2019.05.029
Wang W, Wang Y (2008) Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via partial oxidation of ethanol. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:5035–5044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.086
Wang W, Wang Y (2009) Dry reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production: thermodynamic investigation. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:5382–5389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.054
Wang Y, Zhang S (2017) Economic assessment of selected hydrogen production methods: a review. Energy Sour Part b Econ Plan Policy 12:1022–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1350770
Wang W, Wang Z, Ding Y, Xi J, Lu G (2002) Partial oxidation of ethanol to hydrogen over Ni–Fe catalysts. Catal Lett 81:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016008006076
Wang JH, Lee CS, Lin MC (2009) Mechanism of ethanol reforming: theoretical foundations. J Phys Chem C 113:6681–6688. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp810307h
Wei Y, Cai W, Deng S, Li Z, Yu H, Zhang S, Yu Z, Cui L, Qu F (2020) Efficient syngas production via dry reforming of renewable ethanol over Ni/KIT-6 nanocatalysts. Renew Energy 145:1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.077
Xiong H, Jewell LL, Coville NJ (2015) Shaped carbons as supports for the catalytic conversion of syngas to clean fuels. ACS Catal 5:2640–2658. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b00090
Xu D, Zhang Y, Hsieh TL, Guo M, Qin L, Chung C et al (2018a) A novel chemical looping partial oxidation process for thermochemical conversion of biomass to syngas. Appl Energy 222:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.130
Xu D, Zhang Y, Hsieh TL, Guo M, Qin L, Chung C, Tong A (2018b) A novel chemical looping partial oxidation process for thermochemical conversion of biomass to syngas. Appl Energy 222:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.130
Xu Y, Li X, Gao J, Wang J, Ma G, Wen X et al (2021) A hydrophobic FeMn@ Si catalyst increases olefins from syngas by suppressing C1 by-products. Science 371:610–613. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3649
Yu J, Odriozola JA, Reina TR (2019) Dry reforming of ethanol and glycerol: Mini-review. Catal 9:1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9121015
Yang X, Wang R, Yang J, Qian W, Zhang Y, Li X et al (2020) Exploring the reaction paths in the consecutive Fe-based FT catalyst–zeolite process for syngas conversion. ACS Catal 10:3797–3806. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b05449
Zanchet D, Santos JBO, Damyanova S, Gallo JMR, Bueno JMC (2015) Toward understanding metal-catalyzed ethanol reforming. ACS Catal 5:3841–3863. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs5020755
Zawadzki A, Bellido JDA, Lucrédio AF, Assaf EM (2014) Dry reforming of ethanol over supported Ni catalysts prepared by impregnation with methanolic solution. Fuel Process Technol 128:432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.08.006
Zhang J, Cao XM, Hu P, Zhong Z, Borgna A, Wu P (2011) Density functional theory studies of ethanol decomposition on Rh (211). J Phys Chem C 115:22429–22437. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp206837z
Zhang J, Zhong Z, Cao XM, Hu P, Sullivan MB, Chen L (2014) Ethanol steam reforming on Rh catalysts: theoretical and experimental understanding. ACS Catal 4:448–456. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs400725k
Zhang H, Wang L, Maréchal F, Desideri U (2020a) Techno-economic comparison of green ammonia production processes. Appl Energy 259:114135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114135
Zhang J, Mao Y, Zhang J, Tian J, Sullivan MB, Cao XM, Zeng Y, Li F, Hu P (2020b) CO2 reforming of ethanol: density functional theory calculations, microkinetic modeling, and experimental studies. ACS Catal 10:9624–9633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b05231
Zhao S, Cai W, Li Y, Yu H, Zhang S, Cui L (2017) Syngas production from ethanol dry reforming over Rh/CeO2 catalyst. J Saudi Chem Soc 22:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2017.07.003
Acknowledgements
This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under Grant Number 104.05-2019.344.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shafiqah, MN.N., Siang, T.J., Kumar, P.S. et al. Advanced catalysts and effect of operating parameters in ethanol dry reforming for hydrogen generation. A review. Environ Chem Lett 20, 1695–1718 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01394-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01394-0