Skip to main content
Log in

Colorectal anastomotic stenosis results of a survey of the ASCRS membership

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Anastomotic stenosis is a poorly understood and underexamined complication of gastrointestinal surgery, reportedly most frequent in the coloproctostomy. In order to better define this problem, a questionnaire was sent to members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons regarding patients with gastrointestinal anastomotic stenosis. A total of 123 patients with intestinal anastomotic stenosis were analyzed. Eighty-two anastomoses were stapled and 41 were handsewn. Nearly all stenoses occurred in the distal bowel (70 rectal, 23 sigmoid colon). Preoperative risk factors identified were obesity (28 patients) and abscess (12 patients). Incomplete “doughnuts” were noted in 12 patients. Postoperative anastomotic leaks (15 patients), pelvic infection (13 patients), and postoperative radiation (7 patients) were believed to be contributing factors. Dilatation, using a variety of techniques, was the sole treatment for 65 patients, however, intra-abdominal surgery was necessary in 34 patients. Large intestinal anastomotic stenosis probably occurs most commonly following coloproctostomy (both with handsewn and stapled anastomoses). Dilatation alone resulted in adequate treatment in most patients in the study. Major surgery was required to correct this problem in a significant number of patients (28 percent) in this series. The true incidence of anastomotic stenosis in colorectal surgery is unknown and warrants further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jex RK, VanHeerden JA, Wolff BG, Ready RL, Ilstrup DM. Gastrointestinal anastomoses: factors affecting early complications. Ann Surg 1987;206:138–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith LE. Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:236–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen Z, Myers E, Langer B, Taylor B, Railton RH, Jamieson C. Double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:231–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blamey SL, Lee PW. A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1982;69:19–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fasth S, Hedlund H, Svaninger G, Hulten L. Autosuture of low colorectal anastomosis. Acta Chir Scand 1982;148:535–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson S-A, Oscarson J, Petersson B-G. Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument: a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fain SN, Patin CS, Morgenstern L. Use of a mechanical suturing apparatus in low colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1975;110:1079–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Steinhagen RM, Weakley FL. Anastomosis to the rectum: operative experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:105–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballantyne GH. The experimental basis of intestinal suturing: effect of surgical technique, inflammation, and infection on enteric wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:61–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Polglase AL, Hughes ESR, McDermott FT, Burke FR. A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:792–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Senagore A, Milsom J, Walshaw RJ, Chandry IH. Intramural pH: a quantitative method of predicting colorectal anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum (in press).

  12. Brain J, Lorber M, Fiddian-Green RG. Rectal membrane: an unusual complication following use of the circular stapling instrument for colorectal anastomosis. Surgery 1981;89:271–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fegiz G, Angelini L, Bezzi M. Rectal cancer: restorative surgery with the EEA stapling device. Int Surg 1983;68:13–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goligher JC, Lee PW, MacFie J, Simpkins KC, Lintott DJ. Experience with the Russian Model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979;148:517–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cade D, Gallagher P, Schofield PF, Turner L. Complications of anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling device. Br J Surg 1981;68:339–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Öhman U, Svenberg T. EEA stapler for mid-rectum carcinoma: review of recent literature and own initial experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:775–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beart RW, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1981;141:143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV. Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses: a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg 1982;69:722–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marti M-C, Fiala J-M, Rohner A. EEA stapler in large bowel surgery. World J Surg 1981;5:735–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ. Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1985;72:603–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolton RA, Britton DC. Restorative surgery of the rectum with a circumferential stapler. Lancet 1980;1:850–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kissin MW, Cox AG, Wilkins RA, Kark AE. The fate of the EEA stapled anastomosis: a clinico-radiological study of 38 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1985;67:20–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mazier WP. A technique for the management of low colonic anastomotic stricture. Dis Colon Rectum 1973;16:113–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Manten HD, Zara J, Raskin JB, Goldberg R, Radlhammer DE. Balloon dilation of rectosigmoid strictures: transendoscopic approach. Gastrointest Endosc 1986;32:162–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Whitworth PW, Richardson RL, Larson GM. Balloon dilatation of anastomotic strictures. Arch Surg 1988;123:759–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. French F. Balloon dilatation of post anastomotic colonic strictures (abstr). Gastrointest Endosc 1986;32:170.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Raidoo SN, Angorn IB. Stapled anastomosis after colorectal resection for benign and malignant disease. S Afr Med J 1984;66:819–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Luchtefeld, M.A., Milsom, J.W., Senagore, A. et al. Colorectal anastomotic stenosis results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum 32, 733–736 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562119

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562119

Key words

Navigation