Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utility of biochemical screening in the context of evaluating patients with a presumptive diagnosis of osteoporosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ageing population is expected to increase the burden of osteoporosis on the health care system. Secondary causes of osteoporosis are found in a proportion of patients. There is much controversy regarding the best work-up for patients who have been diagnosed as having osteoporosis based on bone mineral density. It is difficult to decide where interventions should be targeted both from a patient’s perspective and for cost effectiveness. We evaluated the utility of a standard panel (full blood count, plasma viscosity, plasma protein, electrophoresis, urine Bence Jones protein, thyroid function test, bone profile, fasting lipids and liver function test) of biochemical investigations in 327 consecutive patients (287 females, 40 males) referred to the new patient osteoporosis clinic from April 1999 to March 2000. Patients were characterised after measurement of spinal/femoral neck bone mineral density after a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. There were 88 patients with osteoporosis, 91 with osteopenia, 130 had normal bone mineral density and 20 who did not have a bone scan. No case of multiple myeloma was found in this cohort of patients. There was no difference in the mean plasma viscosity of patients with and without osteoporosis (P=0.182). There was no significant difference in the abnormal urine calcium/creatinine (Ca/Cr ratio) in patients with osteoporosis and those without osteoporosis (P=0.316). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hypothyroidism (P=0.213) or thyrotoxicosis (P=0.138) in patients with and without osteoporosis. There was no strong correlation between cholesterol concentrations and osteoporosis (r=0.069). We found no utility in performing a myeloma screen. A small proportion of patients had abnormalities of calcium homeostasis or thyroid disease. We recommend that a screening biochemical evaluation should be restricted to calcium/bone profile and thyroid function tests in patients with a presumptive diagnosis of osteoporosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organisation (1994) Assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk and its role in screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO technical report series no. 843. World Health Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caplan GA, Scane AC, Francis RM (1994) Pathogenesis of vertebral crush fractures in women. J R Soc Med 87:200–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scane AC, Sutcliffe AM, Francis RM (1993) Osteoporosis in men. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 7:589–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crandall C (2003) Laboratory workup for osteoporosis. Which tests are most cost-effective? Postgrad Med 114(3):35–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ikkos D-G, Katsichtis P, Ntalles K, Velentzas C (1971) Osteoporosis in thyrotoxicosis. Lancet 2(7734):1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harvey RD, McHardy KC, Reid IW, Paterson F, Bewsher PD, Duncan A (1991) Measurement of bone collagen degradation in hyperthyroidism and during thyroxine replacement therapy using pyridinium cross-links as specific urinary markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:1189–1194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stall Gm, Harris S, Skoll LJ, Dawson-Hughes B (1990) Accelerated bone loss in hypothyroid patients over treated with l-thyroxine. Ann Intern Med 113:265–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cummings SR, Tao JL, Browner WS; the study f Osteoporotic fracture research group (1992) Hyperthyroidism increases the risk of hip fracture: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 7(Supplement 1):S121

    Google Scholar 

  9. Samelson EJ, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, Wilson PW, Williams SA, Vaccarino V, Zhang Y, Kiel DP (2004) Long-term effects of serum cholesterol on bone mineral density in women and men: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. Bone 34(3):557–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanko LB, Bagger YZ, Nielsen SB, Christiansen C (2003) Does serum cholesterol contribute to vertebral bone loss in postmenopausal women? Bone 32(1):8–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rejnmark L, Buus NH, Vestergaard P, Heickendorff L, Andreasen F, Larsen ML, Mosekilde L (2004) Effects of simvastatin on bone turnover and BMD: a 1-year randomized controlled trial in postmenopausal osteopenic women. J Bone Miner Res 19(5):737–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr, Lindsay RL, Wahner HN, Dunn WL, calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Orwoll E (1998) Osteoporosis in men. Endocrol Metab Clin N Am 27:349–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson BE, Lucasey B, Robinson RG, Lukert BP (1989) Contributing diagnoses in osteoporosis: the value of a complete medical evaluation. Arch Intern Med 149(5):1069–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper A, Brew S, de Lusignan S (2002) The effectiveness of blood tests in detecting secondary osteoporosis or mimicking conditions in postmenopausal women. Br J Gen Pract 52(477):311–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tannenbaum C, Clark J, Schwartzman K, Wallenstein S, Lapinski R, Meier D, Luckey M (2002) Yield of laboratory testing to identify secondary contributors to osteoporosis in otherwise healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(10):4431–4437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Rajeswaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajeswaran, C., Spencer, J., Barth, J.H. et al. Utility of biochemical screening in the context of evaluating patients with a presumptive diagnosis of osteoporosis. Clin Rheumatol 26, 362–365 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0320-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0320-4

Keywords

Navigation