Skip to main content
Log in

Electrophysiological responsiveness and quality of life (QuickDASH, CTSI) evaluation of surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

We evaluated the correlation between Japanese versions of patient-oriented questionnaires and electrophysiological examinations in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods

A series of 45 patients who were diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome and subsequently underwent carpal tunnel release surgery were analyzed. There were 8 men and 37 women with an average age of 64.8 years. They completed the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument (CTSI-JSSH), which consisted of a Symptom Severity Score (CTSI-JSSH-SS), Functional Score (CTSI-JSSH-FS), and Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version-Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH-JSSH) both preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were also performed and included motor distal latency (MDL) and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) measurements. The responsiveness of each instrument was evaluated by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size (ES). Correlation coefficients between preoperative and postoperative questionnaire scores and NCS parameters were calculated.

Results

Responsiveness (SRM/ES) was as follows: CTSI-JSSH-SS (-1.06/-1.14), CTSI-JSSH-FS (-0.75/-0.74), Quick-DASH-JSSH (-0.65/-0.62), MDL (-1.45/-1.11), and the neurophysiological stage of the disease (-0.90/-1.42). No significant correlation was observed between the preoperative and postoperative patient-oriented questionnaires and nerve conduction studies (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Although NCSs and the Japanese version of patient-oriented questionnaires are highly responsive to treatment, they are not parallel. Multifaceted assessment of CTS treatment is possible by performing both outcome measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1585–1592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Imaeda T, Uchiyama S, Toh S, Wada T, Okinaga S, Sawaizumi T, et al. Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and the Impairment Evaluation Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand: validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument. J Orthop Sci 2007;12:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Uchiyama S, Imaeda T, Toh S, Kusunose K, Sawaizumi T, Wada T, et al. Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association; Impairment Evaluation Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand. Comparison of responsiveness of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument to surgical treatment with DASH, SF-36, and physical findings. J Orthop Sci 2007;12: 249–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of the three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87:1038–1046.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Imaeda T, Toh S, Wada T, Uchiyama S, Okinaga S, Kusunose K, et al. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2006;11:248–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan L, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Levenson LM, Hollingworth W, Heagerty PJ, et al. The relationship between electrodiagnostic findings and patient symptoms and function in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schrijver HM, Gerritsen AA, Strijers RL, Uitdehaag BM, Scholten RJ, de Vet HC, et al. Correlating nerve conduction studies and clinical outcome measures on carpal tunnel syndrome: lessons from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Neurophysiol 2005;22:216–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Longstaff L, Milner RH, O’sullivan S, Fawcett P. Carpal tunnel syndrome: the correlation between outcome, symptoms and nerve conduction study findings. J Hand Surg [Br] 2001;26: 475–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhong ES, Han SK, Lee BI, Kim WK. Correlation of electrodiagnostic findings with subjective symptoms in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:127–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mondelli M, Reale F, Sicurelli F, Padua L. Relationship between the self-administered Boston questionnaire and electrophysiological findings in follow-up of surgically-treated carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 2000;25:128–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudley Porras AF, Rojo Alaminos P, Vinuales JI, Ruiz Villamanan MA. Value of electrodiagnostic tests in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 2000;25:361–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. You H, Simmons Z, Freivalds A, Kothari MJ, Naidu SH. Relationships between clinical symptom severity scales and nerve conduction measures in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:497–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Uchiyama S, Toriumi H, Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Ishigaki N, Miyasaka T. Postoperative nerve conduction changes after open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:64–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dellon AL. Evaluation of sensibility and re-education of sensation in the hand. Baltimore: Williams & Willkins; 1981. p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tani T, Ushida T, Kimura J. Sequential changes of orthodromic sensory nerve action potentials induced by experimental compression of the median nerve at the wrist. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:136–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishimura A, Ogura T, Hase H, Makinodan A, Hojo T, Katsumi Y, et al. A correlative electrophysiologic study of nerve fiber involvement in carpal tunnel syndrome using current perception thresholds. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:1921–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang E, Spitzer A, Pfannmüller D, Claus D, Handwerker HO, Neundörfer B. Function of thick and thin nerve fibers in carpal tunnel syndrome before and after surgical treatment. Muscle Nerve 1995;18:207–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Itsubo, T., Uchiyama, S., Momose, T. et al. Electrophysiological responsiveness and quality of life (QuickDASH, CTSI) evaluation of surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Sci 14, 17–23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1290-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1290-y

Keywords

Navigation