Abstract
Background
Little is known about normal in vivo mechanics of the glenohumeral joint. Such an understanding would have significant implications for treating disease conditions that disrupt shoulder function. The objective of this study was to determine articular contact locations between the glenoid and humeral articular surfaces in normal subjects during shoulder abduction with neutral, internal, and external rotations. We hypothesized that glenohumeral articular contact is not perfectly centered and is variable in normal subjects tested under physiological loading conditions.
Methods
Orthogonal fluoroscopic images and magnetic resonance image-based computer models were used to characterize the centroids of articular cartilage contact of the glenohumeral joint at various static, actively stabilized abduction and rotation positions in five healthy shoulders. The shoulder was investigated at 0°, 45°, and 90° abduction with neutral rotation and then at 90° abduction combined with active maximal external rotation and active maximal internal rotation.
Results
For all the investigated positions, the centroid of contact on the glenoid surface for each individual, on average, was more than 5 mm away from the geometric center of the glenoid articular surface. Intersubject variation of the centroid of articular contact on the glenoid surface was observed with each investigated position, and 90° abduction with maximal internal rotation showed the least variability. On the humeral head surface, the centroids of contact were located at the superomedial quarter for all investigated positions, except in two subjects’ positions at 0° abduction, neutral rotation.
Conclusions
The data showed that the in vivo glenohumeral contact locations were variable among subjects, but in all individuals they were not at the center of the glenoid and humeral head surfaces. This confirms that “ball-in-socket” kinematics do not govern normal shoulder function. These insights into glenohumeral articular contact may be relevant to an appreciation of the consequences of pathology such as rotator cuff disease and instability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lippitt S, Matsen F. Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability. Clin Orthop 1993;291:20–28.
Cole BJ, Warner JJP. Anatomy, biomechanics, and pathophysiology of glenohumeral instability. In: Iannotti JP, Williams GR, editors. Disorders of the shoulder: diagnosis and management. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 207–232.
Engin AE, Peindl RD. On the biomechanics of human shoulder complex. I. Kinematics for determination of the shoulder complex sinus. J Biomech 1987;20:103–117.
Högfors C, Sigholm G, Herberts P. Biomechanical model of the human shoulder: I. Elements. J Biomech 1987;20:157–166.
Harryman DT 2nd, Sidles JA, Clark JM, McQuade KJ, Gibb TD, Matsen FA 3rd. Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1334–1343.
Howell SM, Galinat BJ. The glenoid-labral socket: a constrained articular surface. Clin Orthop 1989;243:122–125.
Kelkar R, Wang VM, Flatow EL, Newton PM, Ateshian GA, Bigliani LU, et al. Glenohumeral mechanics: a study of articular geometry, contact, and kinematics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:73–84.
Lösch A, Eckstein F, Haubner M, Englmeier KH. A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 1. Development of a computational method. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:795–804.
Poppen NK, Walker PS. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin Orthop 1978;Sept(135):165–170.
Wuelker N, Schmotzer H, Thren K, Korell M. Translation of the glenohumeral joint with simulated active elevation. Clin Orthop 1994;309:193–200.
Greis PE, Scuderi MG, Mohr RA, Bachus KN, Burks RT. Glenohumeral articular contact areas and pressures following labral and osseous injury to the anteroinferior quadrant of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:442–451.
Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships: an anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:491–500.
Scherrer PK, Hillberry BM. Piecewise mathematical representation of articular surfaces. J Biomech 1979;12:301–311.
Soslowsky LJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, Mow VC. Articular geometry of the glenohumeral joint. Clin Orthop 1992;285:181–190.
Soslowsky LJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, Pawluk RJ, Ateshian GA, Mow VC. Quantitation of in situ contact areas at the glenohumeral joint: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Res 1992;10:524–534.
Conzen A, Eckstein F. Quantitative determination of articular pressure in the human shoulder joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000;9:196–204.
Warner JJ, Bowen MK, Deng X-H, Hannafin JA, Arnoczky SP, Warren RF. Articular contact patterns of the normal glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998;7:381–388.
Apreleva M, Hasselman CT, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL-Y, Warner JJP. A dynamic analysis of glenohumeral motion after simulated capsulolabral injury: a cadaver model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:474–480.
Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Thompson WO, Woo SL-Y, Warner JJP, Fu FH. A new dynamic testing apparatus to study glenohumeral joint motion. J Biomech 1995;28:869–874.
Li G, Wuerz TH, DeFrate LE. Feasibility of using orthogonal fluoroscopic images to measure in vivo joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng 2004;126:314–318.
Edelson JG. Patterns of degenerative change in the glenohumeral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:288–292.
McQuade KJ, Smidt GL. Dynamic scapulohumeral rhythm: the effects of external resistance during elevation of the arm in the scapular plane. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998;27:125–133.
Poppen NK, Walker PS. Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:195–201.
Howell SM, Galinat BJ, Renzi AJ, Marone PJ. Normal and abnormal mechanics of the glenohumeral joint in the horizontal plane. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:227–232.
Graichen H, Jakob J, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Englmeier K-H, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Validation of cartilage volume and thickness measurements in the human shoulder with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003;11:475–482.
Yeh LR, Kwak S, Kim Y-S, Chou DSW, Muhle C, Skaf A, et al. Evaluation of articular cartilage thickness of the humeral head and the glenoid fossa by MR arthrography: anatomic correlation in cadavers. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:500–504.
Schulz CU, Pfahler M, Anetzberger HM, Becker CR, Müller-Gerbl M, Refior HJ. The mineralization patterns at the subchondral bone plate of the glenoid cavity in healthy shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:174–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Boyer, P.J., Massimini, D.F., Gill, T.J. et al. In vivo articular cartilage contact at the glenohumeral joint: preliminary report. J Orthop Sci 13, 359–365 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1237-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1237-3