Skip to main content
Log in

Development and validation of a differential scanning calorimetry purity determination method for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a standard test method for purity by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), ASTM E 928, a purity determination method for highly pure polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) has been developed and validated. The robustness of the developed method was investigated by determining, under varying measurement conditions, the purity of two PAH certified reference materials (CRMs), benzo[c]phenanthrene and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene. The repeatability and intermediate precision of the developed method was determined by analysing the purity of benzo[c]phenanthrene and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene and PAH candidate CRMs indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene, 6-methylchrysene and benzo[a]pyrene. The trueness of the method was studied using the same (candidate) CRMs and a series of 42 other PAH CRMs. For each of the five (candidate) CRMs, a full measurement uncertainty budget was developed. Also for PAH materials for which the DSC purity determination method has not been explicitly validated, the relative expanded measurement uncertainty was estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parrish ZD, White JC, Isleyen M, Gent MPN, Iannucci-Berger W, Eitzer BD, Kelsey JW, Mattina MI (2006) Chemosphere 64:609–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang Y, Tse MF, Young L, Wong MH (2007) Water Res 41:1303–1311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin H, Tao S, Zuo Q, Coveney RM (2007) Environ Pollut 148:614–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh VK, Anand JM, Patel DK, Kumar P, Siddiqui MKJ (2007) Toxicol Lett 172:S124–S125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weisburger JH (1997) Mut Res Fund Mol Mech Mut 376:261–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. White PA (2002) Mut Res Gen Toxicol Env Mut 515:85–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Cogliano V (2005) Lancet Oncol 6:931–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Polycyclic organic matter (2002) US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. http://www.epa.gov. Accessed Sept 2008

  9. European Union (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off J Eur Comm L327:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Union (2005) Directive 2004/107/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off J Eur Comm L23:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Union (1998) Council Directive 98/83/EC. Off J Eur Comm L330:32–54

    Google Scholar 

  12. European Union (2006) Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006. Off J Eur Comm L364:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ulberth F (2006) Anal Bioanal Chem 386:1121–1136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bercaru O, Gawlik BM, Ulberth F, Vandecasteele C (2003) J Environ Monit 5:697–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Emons H (2007) In: Fajgelj A, Belli M, Sansone U (eds), Combining and reporting analytical results, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

  16. Wenzl T, Simon R, Kleiner J, Anklam E (2006) Trends Anal Chem 25:716–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. ISO Guide 34 (2000), General requirements for the competence of reference material producers

  18. Linsinger TPJ, Bernreuther A, Corbisier P, Dabrio M, Emteborg H, Held A, Lamberty A, Lapitajs G, Ricci M, Roebben G, Trapmann S, Ulberth F, Emons H (2007) Accred Qual Assur 12:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giron D (2002) J Therm Anal Calorim 68:335–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kong Y, Hay JN (2003) Eur Polym J 39:1721–1727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ozawa T (2000) Pure Appl Chem 72:2083–2099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Höhne G, Hemminger W, Flammersheim H-J (2003) Differential scanning calorimetry: an introduction for practitioners. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giron D (1989) J Thermal Anal 35:1801–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gray AP (1966) Thermal analysis newsletter no. 5. Analytical Division Perkin–Elmer Corp., Norwalk

  25. Blaine RL, Schoff CK (1984) Purity determinations by thermal methods. ASTM Special Technical Publication 828, West Conshohocken

  26. ASTM E 928 (2008) Standard test method for purity by differential scanning

  27. Staub H, Perron W (1974) Anal Chem 46:128–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brennan WP, DiVito MP, Fyans RL, Gray AP (1984) In: Blaine RL, Schoff CK (eds) Purity determinations by thermal methods, ASTM Special Technical Publication 828, West Conshocken

  29. Vallebona G (1988) J Thermal Anal 34:1101–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Emons H (2008) Policy for the statement of metrological traceability on certificates of ERM® certified reference materials, http://www.erm-crm.org/html/ERM_products/policy_on_traceability/Policy_on_traceability.htm

  31. Duewer DL, Parris RM, White E, May WE, Elbaum H (2004) NIST Special Publication 1012

  32. Csakurda-Harmathy Z, Konkoly Thege L (1997) J Thermal Anal 50:867–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. King B, Westwood S (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 370:194–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Danley R, Kelly T, Groh J (2001) International laboratory. 26:30–31

  35. Online CRM catalogue, European Commission JRC IRMM, Geel. Available at http://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu

  36. Schawe J (2001) Mettler-Toledo UserCom Newsletter 1:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  37. EURACHEM Guide (1998): The fitness for purpose of analytical methods: a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics, LGC, Teddington. http://www.eurachem.org. Accessed March 2009

  38. Drozdzewska K, Kestens V, Held A, Roebben G, Linsinger T (2007) J Therm Anal Calorim 88:757–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gmelin E, Sarge SM (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:1789–1800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sarge SM, Hemminger W, Gmelin E, Höhne GWH, Cammenga HK, Eysel W (1997) J Thermal Anal 49:1125–1134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Linsinger T (2005) Application Note 1, European Commission JRC IRMM, Geel. http://www.erm-crm.org. Accessed March 2009

  42. Kestens V, Auclair G, Drozdzewska K, Held A, Roebben G, Linsinger T (2009) J Therm Anal Calorim. doi:10.1007/s10973-009-0440-6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram Kestens.

Additional information

Certain commercial equipment, instruments, and materials are identified in this paper to specify adequately the experimental procedure. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the European Commission, nor does it imply that the material or equipment is necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kestens, V., Roebben, G. & Linsinger, T. Development and validation of a differential scanning calorimetry purity determination method for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Accred Qual Assur 15, 269–281 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0632-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0632-6

Keywords

Navigation