Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Direct Shear Tests of Sandstone Under Constant Normal Tensile Stress Condition Using a Simple Auxiliary Device

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tension–shear failure is a typical failure mode in the rock masses in unloading zones induced by excavation or river incision, etc., such as in excavation-disturbed zone of deep underground caverns and superficial rocks of high steep slopes. However, almost all the current shear failure criteria for rock are usually derived on the basis of compression–shear failure. This paper proposes a simple device for use with a servo-controlled compression–shear testing machine to conduct the tension–shear tests of cuboid rock specimens, to test the direct shear behavior of sandstone under different constant normal tensile stress conditions (σ = −1, −1.5, −2, −2.5 and −3 MPa) as well as the uniaxial tension behavior. Generally, the fracture surface roughness decreases and the proportion of comminution areas in fracture surface increases as the change of stress state from tension to tension–shear and to compression–shear. Stepped fracture is a primary fracture pattern in the tension–shear tests. The shear stiffness, shear deformation and normal deformation (except the normal deformation for σ = −1 MPa) decrease during shearing, while the total normal deformation containing the pre-shearing portion increases as the normal tensile stress level (|σ|) goes up. Shear strength is more sensitive to the normal tensile stress than to the normal compressive stress, and the power function failure criterion (or Mohr envelope form of Hoek–Brown criterion) is examined to be the optimal criterion for the tested sandstone in the full region of tested normal stress in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aimone-Martin CT, Oravecz KI, Nytra TK (1997) A mechanical device for the measurement of combined shear and tension in rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(1):147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliha MRM, Ayatollahi MR, Akbardoost J (2012) Typical upper bound–lower bound mixed mode fracture resistance envelopes for rock material. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(1):65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shayea N (2002) Comparing reservoir and outcrop specimens for mixed mode i–ii fracture toughness of a limestone rock formation at various conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 35(4):271–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2013) Shear strength criteria for rock, rock joints, rockfill and rock masses: problems and some solutions. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5(4):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobich JK (2005) Experimental analysis of the extension to shear fracture transition in Berea Sandstone. MS thesis, Texas A & M University

  • Bons PD, Elburg MA, Gomez-Rivas E (2012) A review of the formation of tectonic veins and their microstructures. J Struct Geol 43(43):33–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace WF (1964) Brittle fracture of rocks. In: Judd WR (ed) State of stress in the earth’s crust. American Elsevier, New York, pp 111–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho N, Martin CD, Sego DC (2008) Development of a shear zone in brittle rock subjected to direct shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(8):1335–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelder T (1989) Analysis of pinnate joints in the Mount Desert Island granite: implications for postintrusion kinematics in the coastal volcanic belt, Maine. Geology 17(6):564–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelder T (1999) Transitional-tensile fracture propagation: a status report. J Struct Geol 21(8):1049–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrill DA, Mcginnis RN, Morris AP, Smart KJ (2012) Hybrid failure: field evidence and influence on fault refraction. J Struct Geol 42:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukui K, Okubo S, Ogawa A (2004) Some aspects of loading-rate dependency of Sanjome andesite strengths. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(7):1215–1219

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 80–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock PL (1985) Brittle microtectonics: principles and practice. J Struct Geol 7(3–4):437–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng Div 106(9):1013–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Martin CD (2014) Fracture initiation and propagation in intact rock—a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(4):287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang RQ, Huang D (2014) Evolution of rock cracks under unloading condition. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(2):453–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Li Y (2014) Conversion of strain energy in triaxial unloading tests on marble. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 66(2):160–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang RQ, Wang XN, Chan LS (2001) Triaxial unloading test of rocks and its implication for rock burst. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60(1):37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labuz JF, Zang A (2012) Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(6):975–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Q, Fakhimi A, Haggerty M, Labuz JF (2009) Initiation of tensile and mixed-mode fracture in sandstone. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(3):489–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson MS, Wong TF (2005) Experimental rock deformation—the brittle field, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 49–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit JP (1988) Normal stress dependent rupture morphology in direct shear tests on sandstone with applications to some natural fault surface features. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 25(6):411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey JM, Chester FM (2004) Hybrid fracture and the transition from extension fracture to shear fracture. Nature 428(6978):63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reches Z, Lockner D (1994) Nucleation and growth of faults in brittle rocks. J Geophys Res 99(B9):18159–18174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren L, Xie LZ, Xie HP, Ai T, He B (2016) Mixed-mode fracture behavior and related surface topography feature of a typical sandstone. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi:10.1007/s00603-016-0959-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez E (2005) A microstructural study of the extension-to-shear fracture transition in Carrara Marble. MS thesis, Texas A & M University

  • Saiang D, Malmgren L, Nordlund E (2005) Laboratory tests on shotcrete-rock joints in direct shear, tension and compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38(4):275–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott TE, Nielsen KC (1991) The effects of porosity on the brittle-ductile transition in sandstones. J Geophys Res Atmos 96(B1):405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibberley CAJ, Petit JP, Rives T (2000) Micromechanics of shear rupture and the control of normal stress. J Struct Geol 22(4):411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Liu T, Liu J, Tang X (2009) Excavation unloading destruction phenomena in rock dam foundations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68(2):257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xeidakis GS, Samaras IS, Zacharopoulos DA, Papakaliatakis GE (1997) Trajectories of unstably growing cracks in mixed mode i–ii loading of marble beams. Rock Mech Rock Eng 30(1):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie HQ, He CH (2004) Study of the unloading characteristics of a rock mass using the triaxial test and damage mechanics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(Supplement 1):74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41472245 and 41672300), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 106112016CDJZR208804) and Scientific Research Foundation of State Key Lab. of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control (No. 2011DA105287-MS201502).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Da Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cen, D., Huang, D. Direct Shear Tests of Sandstone Under Constant Normal Tensile Stress Condition Using a Simple Auxiliary Device. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50, 1425–1438 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1179-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1179-1

Keywords

Navigation