Abstract
Patients with cervical myelopathy may experience symptoms of radiculopathy, and it is not easy to determine whether these symptoms are caused by the myelopathy itself or by a radiculopathy accompanied by root compression. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of radiculopathy combined with cervical myelopathy and to evaluate the characteristics of cervical myelopathy with or without radiculopathy. We enrolled 127 patients with cervical myelopathy in this retrospective study and reviewed their medical records and magnetic resonance imaging findings. They were divided into two groups according to the presence of cervical radiculopathy, and their age, sex, involved spinal segment, cord signal change, surgical method, clinical status were compared, and postsurgical recovery was compared using four clinical questionnaires. The incidence and level of radiculopathy combined with myelopathy were investigated. Combined cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy was diagnosed in 66 patients (51.9%, group 1), whereas 61 patients did not have radiculopathy (group 2). There was no difference in sex, age, cord signal change, preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association score, neck disability index, and neck visual analogue scale (VAS) between the two groups, but group 1 showed higher preoperative arm VAS score (p = 0.001). Postoperative arm and neck VAS scores were significantly improved in group 1 (p = 0.001 and 0.009). Half of the patients had combined cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy. A high preoperative arm VAS score was a characteristic of radiculopathy combined with myelopathy.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00590-017-1972-2/MediaObjects/590_2017_1972_Fig1_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Choi BW, Song KJ (2011) Current concept on the surgical treatment by anterior approach in degenerative cervical radiculopathy. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 18(1):34–41
Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL, Gregory A, Clary R (2006) A nonsurgical approach to the management of patients with cervical radiculopathy: a prospective observational cohort study. J Manip Physiol Ther 29(4):279
Harrop JS, Naroji S, Maltenfort M et al (2010) Cervical myelopathy: a clinical and radiographic evaluation and correlation to cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(6):620–624
Albert TJ, Murrell SE (1999) Surgical management of cervical radiculopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7(6):368–376
Kadanka Z, Bednarik J, Novotny O et al (2011) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years. Eur Spine J 20(9):1533–1538
Yang K, Lu X, Cai Q, Ye L, Lu W (1987) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by anterior multilevel decompression and fusion: follow-up report of 214 cases. Clin Orthop 221:161–164
Henderson CM, Hennessy RG, Shuey HM Jr, Shackelford GE (1983) Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery 13(5):504–512
Chiles BW III, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR (1999) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 44(4):762–769
Ono K, Ebara S, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K (1987) Myelopathy hand. new clinical signs of cervical cord damage. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69(2):215–219
Ebara S, Yonenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Ono K (1988) Myelopathy hand characterized by muscle wasting: a different type of myelopathy hand in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13(7):785–791
Wepking KN, Mohamed A, Kurd MF, Lee JK, Ahmadinia K, An HS (2013) The prevalence of cervical radiculopathy in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine J 13(9):S21–S22
Shah KC, Rajshekhar V (2004) Reliability of diagnosis of soft cervical disc prolapse using spurling’s test. Br J Neurosurg 18(5):480–483
Mostofi K, Khouzani RK (2016) Reliability of cervical radiculopathy, its congruence between patient history and medical imaging evidence of disc herniation and its role in surgical decision. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(7):805–808
Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72(8):1178–1184
Rubinstein SM, Pool JJ, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HC (2007) A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J 16(3):307–319
Butler DS, Jones MA, Gore R (1991) Mobilisation of the nervous system. Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne
Boyling JD, Jull G (2004) Grieve’s modern manual therapy. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Kim BJ, Ko HS, Seo JG, Choo SK, Kim JH (1995) Surgical treatment of cervical disc herniation. J Korean Orthop Assoc 30(3):545–550
Tong HC, Haig AJ, Yamakawa K (2002) The spurling test and cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(2):156–159
Viikari-Juntura E, Porras M, Laasonen EM (1989) Validity of clinical tests in the diagnosis of root compression in cervical disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14(3):253–257
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Each author clarifies that he has no conflicts of interest in relation to the conduction or publication of this study. No financial support was received.
Ethics approval
This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of Haeundae Paik Hospital. Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants.
Open access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, BW., Kim, SS., Lee, DH. et al. Cervical radiculopathy combined with cervical myelopathy: prevalence and characteristics. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27, 889–893 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1972-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1972-2