Skip to main content
Log in

Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A retrospective radiographic study was carried out to analyze the effect of lumbar disc herniation on the kinetic motion of adjacent segments.

Methods

A total of 162 patients with low back pain or radicular pain in the lower limbs without a prior history of surgery were evaluated using kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Translational motion, angular variation, and disc height were measured at each segment from L1–L2 to L5–S1. Other factors including the degree of disc degeneration, age, gender, and vertebral segment location were analyzed to determine any predisposing risk factors for segmental instability adjacent to disc herniations.

Results

Spinal levels above the disc herniation exhibited, on average, a 6.4 % increase in translational motion per mm of disc herniation (P = 0.496) and a 21.4 % increase in angular motion per mm herniation (P = 0.447). Levels below the herniation demonstrated a 5.2 % increase in translational motion per mm of disc herniation (P = 0.428) and a decrease of 10.7 % in angular motion per mm (P = 0.726). The degree of disc degeneration had no significant correlation with adjacent level motion. Similarly, disc herniation was not significantly correlated with disc height at adjacent levels, although there was a significant relationship between gender and adjacent segment disc height.

Conclusions

Although disc height, translational motion, and angular variation are significantly affected at the level of a disc herniation, no significant changes are apparent in adjacent segments. Our results indicate that herniated discs have no effect on range of motion at adjacent levels regardless of the degree of disc degeneration or the size of disc herniation, suggesting that the natural progression of disc degeneration and adjacent segment disease may be separate, unrelated processes within the lumbar spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inoue N, Espinoza Orías AA (2011) Biomechanics of intervertebral disk degeneration. Orthop Clin North Am 42:487–499

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lund T, Oxland TR (2011) Adjacent level disk disease–is it really a fusion disease? Orthop Clin North Am 42:529–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chou R, Deyo RA, Jarvik JG (2012) Appropriate use of lumbar imaging for evaluation of low back pain. Radiol Clin North Am 50:569–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leone A, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Guglielmi G, Bonomo L (2009) Degenerative lumbar intervertebral instability: what is it and how does imaging contribute? Skeletal Radiol 38:529–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Splendiani A, Ferrari F, Barile A, Masciocchi C, Gallucci M (2014) Occult neural foraminal stenosis caused by association between disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis: demonstration with dedicated upright MRI system. Radiol Med 119:164–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarantino U, Fanucci E, Lundusi R, Celi M, Altobelli S, Gasbarra E, Simonetti G, Manenti G (2013) Lumbar spine MRI in upright position for diagnosing acute and chronic low back pain: statistical analysis of morphological changes. J Orthop Traumatol 14:15–22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zou J, Yang H, Miyazaki M, Wei F, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC (2008) Missed lumbar disc herniations diagnosed with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 33:E140–E144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Daffner SD, Xin J, Taghavi CE, Hymanson HJ, Mudiyam C, Hongyu W, Wang JC (2009) Cervical segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation as determined with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 34:2389–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karadimas EJ, Siddiqui M, Smith FW, Wardlaw D (2006) Positional MRI changes in supine versus sitting postures in patients with degenerative lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:495–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan Y, Aghdasi BG, Montgomery SR, Inoue H, Lu C, Wang JC (2012) Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar segmental mobility in patients without significant spondylosis. Eur Spine J 21:2673–2679

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kong MH, Hymanson HJ, Song KY, Chin DK, Cho YE, Yoon do H, Wang JC (2009) Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of abnormal segmental motion of the functional spine unit. J Neurosurg Spine 10:357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK (2014) Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J 14:2525–2545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26:1873–1878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfirrmann CW, Dora C, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2004) MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology 230:583–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ha KY, Schendel MJ, Lewis JL, Ogilvie JW (1993) Effect of immobilization and configuration on lumbar adjacent-segment biomechanics. J Spinal Disord 6:99–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagata H, Schendel MJ, Transfeldt EE, Lewis JL (1993) The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. Spine 18:2471–2479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujiwara A, Tamai K, An HS, Kurihashi T, Lim TH, Yoshida H, Saotome K (2000) The relationship between disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and stability of the degenerative lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 13:444–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Reikerås O (1996) Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 11:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallucci M, Limbucci N, Paonessa A, Splendiani A (2007) Degenerative disease of the spine. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 17:87–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, Goldfarb N, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine 33:1701–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, Spratt KF, Semmer N, Aebi M (1995) 1995 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations. Spine 20:2613–2625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 331:69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:403–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal SL (2009) Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9:374–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bae JS, Lee SH, Kim JS, Jung B, Choi G (2010) Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 3 years of follow-up. Neurosurgery 67:1600–1607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Koureas G, Lambiris E (2004) Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results. Spine 29:735–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee DY, Lee SH, Maeng DH (2010) Two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a minimum 3-year follow-up study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 50:645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Splendiani A, Puglielli E, De Amicis R, Barile A, Masciocchi C, Gallucci M (2004) Spontaneous resolution of lumbar disk herniation: predictive signs for prognostic evaluation. Neuroradiology 46:916–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey C. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lao, L., Daubs, M.D., Takahashi, S. et al. Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation. Eur Spine J 25, 222–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3977-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3977-z

Keywords

Navigation