Skip to main content
Log in

The risks of aorta impingement from pedicle screw may increase due to aorta movement during posterior instrumentation in Lenke 5C curve: a computed tomography study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the aorta movement following correction surgery for patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis and to determine the subsequent risk of the aorta impingement for pedicle screw (PS) misplacement.

Methods

Thirty-six AIS patients with a main thoracolumbar or lumbar curve were included in this study. According to the direction of the main curve, the patients were divided into Group R and Group L, with Group R comprising 16 patients with a right-sided curve and Group L comprising 20 patients with a left-sided curve. All patients underwent CT scans of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine before and after surgery. To identify the relative positions of the aorta to vertebral body, several parameters were measured from the CT images of the middle transverse planes of vertebrae from T11 to L4, including aorta–vertebra angle (α), vertebral rotation angle (β), left safety distance (LSD) and right safety distance (RSD). The risk of the aorta impingement from T11 to L4 was calculated. An intragroup comparison regarding the position of the aorta relative to the vertebral body before and after correction surgery was performed accordingly.

Results

After surgery, the aorta moved toward the vertebral body among all levels in both groups. Compared with that in Group L, the aorta in Group R was significantly closer to the entry point at all levels, especially at T11. Before surgery, the aorta in Group R was at a high risk of impingement from left PS placement regardless of the diameters of the simulated screws. While in Group L, the risk of aorta impingement was mainly caused by the right placement of 45 mm PS. After surgery, both groups had an increased risk of aorta impingement from PS insertion, especially at T11. The risk of aorta impingement from PS placement was significantly higher in Group R than in Group L.

Conclusion

The risk of aorta impingement increased as the aorta shifted leftward after correction surgery, especially in right-sided Lenke 5C curve. Thus, preoperative risk evaluation could be insufficient for clinical practice due to aorta movement following correction surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the potential risk of aorta impingement, especially when placing PS in patients with right-sided curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akçalı Ö, Alıcı E, Koşay C (2003) Apical instrumentation alters the rotational correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 12:124–129

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Gressot LV, Hubler K, Marks MC, Bastrom TP, Betz RR, Cahill PJ (2012) Effect of direct vertebral body derotation on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21:31–39

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hee HT, Yu ZR, Wong HK (2007) Comparison of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation versus anterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Spine 32:1533–1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li M, Ni J, Fang X, Liu H, Zhu X, He S, Gu S, Wang X (2009) Comparison of selective anterior versus posterior screw instrumentation in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 34:1162–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, Baldus C (1995) Analysis of pulmonary function and chest cage dimension changes after thoracoplasty in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1343–1350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Şarlak AY, Buluç L, Sarısoy HT, Memişoğlu K, Tosun B (2008) Placement of pedicle screws in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis of screw placement relative to structures at risk. Eur Spine J 17:657–662

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu J, Shen J, Zhang J, Li S, Zhao H, Qiu G, Wang Y (2012) The position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement in the correction of idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:E103–E107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Minor ME, Morrissey NJ, Peress R, Carroccio A, Ellozy S, Agarwal G, Teodorescu V, Hollier LH, Marin ML (2004) Endovascular treatment of an iatrogenic thoracic aortic injury after spinal instrumentation: case report. J Vasc Surg 39:893–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kakkos SK, Shepard AD (2008) Delayed presentation of aortic injury by pedicle screws: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 47:1074–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qiao J, Zhu F, Xu L, Zhu Z, Qian B, Liu Z, Qiu Y (2012) Comparison of the aorta impingement risks between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study. Eur Spin J 21:2043–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang W, Zhu Z, Zhu F, Wang B, Chu WC, Cheng JC, Qiu Y (2008) The changes of relative position of the thoracic aorta after anterior or posterior instrumentation of type I Lenke curve in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spin J 17:1019–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Ono T, Ogihara S, Chikuda H, Shoda N, Nakao Y, Matsudaira K, Seichi A, Nakamura K (2010) New parameters to represent the position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement. Eur Spin J 19:815–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sucato DJ, Duchene C (2003) The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 85:1461–1469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milbrandt TA, Sucato DJ (2007) The position of the aorta relative to the spine in patients with left thoracic scoliosis: a comparison with normal patients. Spine 32:E348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cinotti G, Gumina S, Ripani M, Postacchini F (1999) Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine: a morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Spine 24:114–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Qiu X, Jiang H, Qian B, Wang W, Zhu F, Zhu Z, Qiu Y (2013) Influence of prone positioning on potential risk of aorta injury from pedicle screw misplacement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(5):E162–E167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Nakao Y, Ono T, Taniguchi Y, Chikuda H, Shoda N, Oshima Y, Higashikawa A, Nakamura K (2010) Aorta movement in patients with scoliosis after posterior surgery. Spine 35:E1571–E1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kakkos SK, Shepard AD (2008) Delayed presentation of aortic injury by pedicle screws: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 47:1074–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wegener B, Birkenmaier C, Fottner A, Jansson V, Dürr HR (2008) Delayed perforation of the aorta by a thoracic pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 17:351–354

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Faro FD, Farnsworth CL, Shapiro GS, Mohamad F, White KK, Breisch E, Mahar Andrew T, Tomlinson T, Bawa M, Gomez M, Newton PO (2005) Thoracic vertebral screw impingement on the aorta in an in vivo bovine model. Spine 30:2406–2413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE (2004) The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws. Spine 29:269–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang Z, Wang Q, Yang J, Li F (2014) Vertebral derotation by vertebral column manipulator improves postoperative radiographs outcomes of Lenke 5C patients for follow up minimum 2 year. J Spinal Disord Tech

  24. Jiang H, Qiu X, Wang W, Zhu Z, Qian B, Guo J, Qiu Y (2012) The position of the aorta changes with altered body position in single right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 37:E1054–E1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oertel MF, Hobart J, Stein M, Schreiber V, Scharbrodt W (2011) Clinical and methodological precision of spinal navigation assisted by 3D intraoperative O-arm radiographic imaging: technical note. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 14:532–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Public Health Benefit Research Foundation, China (Grant No. 201002018).

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zezhang Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Xu, L., Qiu, Y. et al. The risks of aorta impingement from pedicle screw may increase due to aorta movement during posterior instrumentation in Lenke 5C curve: a computed tomography study. Eur Spine J 24, 1481–1489 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3823-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3823-3

Keywords

Navigation