Abstract
We conducted greenhouse experiments using Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca) seedlings where chemical methods (fungicides) were used to prevent ectomycorrhizal colonization of single seedlings or physical methods (mesh barriers) were used to prevent formation of mycorrhizal connections between neighboring seedlings. These methods were chosen for their ease of application in the field. We applied the fungicides, Topas® (nonspecific) and Senator® (ascomycete specific), separately and in combination at different concentrations and application frequencies to seedlings grown in unsterilized forest soils. Additionally, we assessed the ability of hyphae to penetrate mesh barriers of various pore sizes (0.2, 1, 20, and 500 μm) to form mycorrhizas on roots of neighboring seedlings. Ectomycorrhizal colonization was reduced by approximately 55% with the application of Topas® at 0.5 g l−1. Meshes with pore sizes of 0.2 and 1 μm were effective in preventing the formation of mycorrhizas via hyphal growth across the mesh barriers. Hence, meshes in this range of pore sizes could also be used to prevent the formation of common mycorrhizal networks in the field. Depending on the ecological question of interest, Topas® or the employment of mesh with pore sizes <1 μm are suitable for restricting mycorrhization in the field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agerer R (1987–1998) Colour atlas of ectomycorrhizae. Einhorn-Verlag Eduard Dietenberger, Munich Germany
Baldwin QF, Egger KN (1996) Protocols for analysis of DNA from mycorrhizal roots. In: Goodman DM, Durall DM, Trofymow JA, Berch SM (eds) Concise descriptions of North American ectomycorrhizae. Mycologue, Victoria BC, pp 3C.1–3C.2
de la Bastide PY, Kendrick B (1990) The invitro effects of benomyl on disease tolerance, ectomycorrhiza formation and growth of white-pine (Pinus strobus) seedlings. Can J Bot 68:444–448
Bergerud W (1989) ANOVA: Factorial designs with a separate control. Biometrics Information Pamphlet 14. British Columbia Ministry of Forest Research Branch, Victoria BC
Booth MG (2004) Mycorrhizal networks mediate overstorey–understorey competition in a temperate forest. Ecol Lett 7:538–546
Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Barth S, Ramsey PW, Gannon JE (2004) Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives. Ecology 85:1062–1071
Cardoso IM, Boddington CL, Janssen BH, Oenema O, Kuyper TW (2004) Double pot and double compartment: integrating two approaches to study nutrient uptake by AMF. Plant Soil 260:301–310
Chambers DP, Attiwill PM (1994) The ash-bed effect in Eucalyptus regnans forest: chemical, physical and microbiological changes in soil after heating or partial sterilisation. Aust J Bot 42:739–749
Dhillion SS, Gardsjord TL (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizas influence plant diversity, productivity, and nutrients in boreal grasslands. Can J Bot 82:104–114
Ekelund F, Westergaard K, Søe D (2000) The toxicity of the fungicide propiconazole to soil flagellates. Biol Fertil Soils 31:70–77
Elmholt S (1992) Effect of propiconazole on substrate amended soil respiration following laboratory and field application. Pestic Sci 34:139–146
Francis R, Read DJ (1984) Direct transfer of carbon between plants connected by vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium. Nature 307:53–56
Goodman DM, Durall DM, Trofymow JA, Berch SM (1996) Concise descriptions of North American ectomycorrhizae. Mycologue and Canada-B.C. FRDA, Pacific Forestry Center, Victoria BC
Hagerman SM and Durall DM (2004) Ectomycorrhizal colonization of greenhouse-grown Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings by inoculum associated with the roots of refuge plants sampled from a Douglas-fir forest in the southern interior of British Columbia. Can J Bot 82:742–751
Hagerman SM, Jones MD, Bradfield, GE, Sakakibara SM (2001) The potential for woody understory plants to provide refuge for ectomycorrhizal inoculum at an interior Douglas-fir forest after clear-cut logging. Can J For Res 31:711–721
Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT (1999) Mycorrhizae influence plant community structure and diversity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 80:1187–1195
Harvey AE, Larsen MJ, Jurgensen MF (1976) Distribution of ectomycorrhizae in a mature Douglas-fir/larch soil in western Montana. For Sci 22:393–633
Ingleby K, Mason PA, Last FT, Flemming LV (1990) Identification of ectomycorrhizae. ITE Research Publication 5, HMSO London
Johnson D, Leake JR, Read DJ (2001) Novel in-growth core system enables functional studies of grassland mycorrhizal mycelial networks. New Phytol 152:555–562
Jones MJ, Durall DM, Harniman SMK, Classen DC, Simard SW (1997) Ectomycorrhizal diversity of Betula papyrifera and Pseudotsuga menziesii seedlings grown in the greenhouse or in single-species and mixed plots in southern British Columbia. Can J For Res 27:1872–1889
Kahiluoto H, Ketoja E, Vestberg M (2000) Creation of a non-mycorrhizal control for a bioassay of AM effectiveness 1. Comparison of methods. Mycorrhiza 9:241–258
Kendrick B (2000) The fifth kingdom, 3rd edn. USA: Focus, Newburyport MA
Kranabetter JM (2005) Understory conifer seedling response to a gradient of root and ectomycorrhizal fungal contact. Can J Bot 83:638–646
Krzic M, Bulmer CE, Teste FP, Dampier L, Rahman S (2004) Soil properties influencing compactibility of forest soils in British Columbia. Can J Soil Sci 84:219–226
Laatikainen T, Heinonen-Tanski H (2002) Mycorrhizal growth in pure cultures in the presence of pesticides. Microbiol Res 157:127–137
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Lensi R, Lescure C, Steinberg C, Savoie JM, Faurie G (1991) Dynamics of residual enzyme activities, denitrification potential, and physio-chemical properties in a γ-sterilized soil. Soil Biol Biochem 23:367–373
Manninen AM, Laatikaninen T, Holopainen T (1998) Condition of Scots pine fine roots and mycorrhiza after fungicide application and low-level ozone exposure in a 2-year field experiment. Trees 12:347–355
Marsh JF, Schultze M (2001) Analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizas using symbiosis-defective plant mutants. New Phytol 150:525–532
Martin KJ, Rygiewicz PT (2005) Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts. BMC Microbiol 5:28, Article Number
Marx DH, Rowan SJ (1981) Fungicides influence growth and development of specific ectomycorrhizae on loblolly-pine seedlings. For Sci 27:167–176
Meidinger D, Pojar J (1991) Ecosystems of British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Special Report Series 6, Victoria BC
Mikola P (1988) Ectendomycorrhiza of conifers. Silva Fenn 22:19–27
O’Neill JM, Mitchell DT (2000) Effects of benomyl and captan on growth and mycorrhizal colonization of Sitka-spruce (Picea sitchensis) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Irish nursery soil. For Pathol 30:165–174
Page-Dumroese DS, Harvey AE, Jurgensen MF, Larsen MJ (1996) Ponderosa pine seedling response to planting—site soil fumigation and fungicide application. Northwest Sci 70:139–147
Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-AMF for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc 55:158–160
Pawuk WH, Ruehle JL, Marx DH (1980) Fungicide drenches affect ectomycorrhizal development of container grown Pinus palustris seedlings. Can J For Res 10:61–64
Read DJ (2002) Towards ecological relevance—progress and pitfalls in the path towards an understanding of mycorrhizal functions in nature. In: van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology. Ecological Studies 157. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–31
Reddy MS, Natarajan K (1995) Effects of the fungicide Dithane M-45 on the growth and mycorrhizal formation of Pinus patula seedlings. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1503–1504
Robinson D, Fitter A (1999) The magnitude and control of carbon transfer between plants linked by a common mycorrhizal network. J Exp Bot 50:913
SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary NC USA
Schüepp H, Bodmer M, Miller DD (1992) A cuvette system designed to enable monitoring of growth and spread of hyphae of vesicular-AMF external to plant roots. In: Norris JR, Read DJ, Varma AK (eds) Methods in microbiology: vol 24. Academic, London UK, pp 67–76
Shaw LJ, Beaton Y, Glover LA, Killham K, Meharg AA (1999) Re-inoculation of autoclaved soil as a non-sterile treatment for xenobiotic sorption and biodegradation studies. Applied Soil Ecology 11:217–226
Sheremata TW, Yong RN, Guiot SR (1997) Simulation and sterilization of a surrogate soil organic matter for the study of the fate of trichloroethylene in soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 28:1177–1190
Simard SW, Durall DM (2004) Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function and importance. Can J Bot 82:1140–1165
Simard S, Perry D, Smith J, Molina R (1997) Effects of soil trenching on occurrence of ectomycorrhizas on Pseudotsuga menziesii seedlings grown in mature forest of Betula papyrifera and Pseudotsuga menziesii. New Phytol 136:327–340
Summerbell RC (1988) Benomyl-tolerant microfungi associated with mycorrhizae of black spruce. Can J Bot 66:553–557
Tarafdar JC, Marschner H (1994) Phosphatase-activity in the rhizosphere and hyphosphere of VA mycorrhizal wheat supplied with inorganic and organic phosphorus. Soil Biol Biochem 26:387–395
Teste FP, Schmidt MG, Berch SM, Bulmer C, Egger KN (2004) Effects of ectomycorrhizal inoculants on survival and growth of interior Douglas-fir seedlings on reforestation sites and partially rehabilitated landings. Can J For Res 34:2074–2088
White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee SB, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic, London UK, pp 315–322
Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC, Smith MD, Kobbeman K (2001) Effects of mycorrhizae on growth and demography of tallgrass prairie forbs. Am J Bot 88:1452–1457
Zabinski CA, Quinn L, Callaway RM (2002) Phosphorus uptake, not carbon transfer, explains arbuscular mycorrhizal enhancement of Centaurea maculosa in the presence of native grassland species. Funct Ecol 16:758–765
Zambonelli A, Iotti M (2001) Effects of fungicides on Tuber borchii and Hebeloma sinapizans ectomycorrhizas. Mycol Res 105:611–614
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Graeme Hope and Shannon Berch for their aid at the early stages of the field work. We thank Peter McAuliffe, Jon Millar, Dave Enns, and Mike Carlson for their valuable insight at the beginning of the greenhouse work. We also thank Candis Staley, Amanda Schoonmaker, and Lenka Kudrna, for assistance with applying the fungicide treatments, morphotyping, and the molecular analysis, respectively. Tony Kozak and Wendy Bergerud provided useful insights on the data analysis. Funding was provided by a Forest Science Program of Forest Investment Innovation of British Columbia grant to S. Simard, a Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies scholarship to J. Karst, a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant to M. Jones, and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation grants to S. Simard and D. Durall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
François P. Teste and Justine Karst contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teste, F.P., Karst, J., Jones, M.D. et al. Methods to control ectomycorrhizal colonization: effectiveness of chemical and physical barriers. Mycorrhiza 17, 51–65 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0083-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0083-4