Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Integration of open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer resection: oncologic and short-term outcomes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy is increasingly used for rectal cancer surgery. Laparoscopic surgery is not attempted for some suitable patients because of concerns for conversion or technical difficulty. This study aimed to evaluate oncologic and short-term outcomes for patients undergoing curative resection for rectal cancer via laparoscopic and open approaches.

Methods

A prospective database was reviewed to identify rectal cancer resections from 2005 to 2011. Patients who had primary rectal cancer within 15 cm of the anal verge were included in the study. Those with recurrent or metastatic disease were excluded. Patients were assigned to laparoscopic or open approaches preoperatively based on clinical criteria and imaging. All patients underwent a standard total mesorectal excision and followed a standardized enhanced recovery pathway. The oncologic and clinical outcomes were evaluated by approach.

Results

The analysis included 81 patients. The preoperative assignments consisted of 62 laparoscopic (77 %) and 19 open (23 %) procedures. Nine laparoscopic procedures (14.5 %) were converted to open procedures. After a median follow-up period of 25 months, all oncologic outcomes were comparable. Three patients (two laparoscopic, one open) had a positive circumferential margin (≤1 mm). The laparoscopic and open groups were similar in terms of their 3-year disease-free periods (93.6 vs. 88.2 %; P = 0.450) and overall survival periods (93.5 vs. 90.9 %; P = 0.766). The local recurrence rate was 2.5 %.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer can be attempted for most patients. Conversion to open procedure does not compromise clinical or oncologic outcomes. In practice, combining laparoscopic and open surgery optimizes resource use and results in at least equivalent outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leung KL, Lai PB, Ho RL, Meng WC, Yiu RY, Lee JF, Lau WY (2000) Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 231:506–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson C, Uman G, Pigazzi A (2008) Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:1135–1142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P, Darzi AW, Heriot AG (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13:413–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS (2006) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:652–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lelong B, Bege T, Esterni B, Guiramand J, Turrini O, Moutardier V, Magnin V, Monges G, Pernoud N, Blache JL et al (2007) Short-term outcome after laparoscopic or open restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:176–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Teoh AY, Leung WW (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2418–2425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Staudacher C, Vignali A, Saverio DP, Elena O, Andrea T (2007) Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision in unselected patients with rectal cancer: impact on early outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1324–1331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strohlein MA, Grutzner KU, Jauch KW, Heiss MM (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic vs open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:385–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baik SH, Gincherman M, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Fleshman JW (2011) Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. Dis Colon Rectum 54:6–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Gineste C, Saric J, Rullier E (2007) Laparoscopic approach in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:1555–1561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS (2009) Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: 10-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52:558–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP (2011) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:415–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Azuma T, Mori Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2011) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1375–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Row D, Weiser MR (2010) An update on laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Cancer Control 17:16–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner S (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15:827–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Delaney CP (2008) Outcome of discharge within 24–72 h after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:181–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Delaney CP, Brady K, Woconish D, Parmar SP, Champagne BJ (2012) Towards optimizing perioperative colorectal care: outcomes for 1,000 consecutive laparoscopic colon procedures using enhanced recovery pathways. Am J Surg 203:353–355 (discussion 355–356)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindsetmo RO, Champagne B, Delaney CP (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resections and fast-track surgery: what can be expected? Am J Surg 197:408–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2006) A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1,000 cases. Am J Surg 191:377–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Poon JT, Law WL (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3038–3047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindsetmo RO, Delaney CP (2009) A standardized technique for laparoscopic rectal resection. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2059–2063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Park IJ, Kim JC (2010) Adequate length of the distal resection margin in rectal cancer: from the oncological point of view. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1331–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chan AC, Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo SH, Law WL (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ptok H, Steinert R, Meyer F, Kroll KP, Scheele C, Kockerling F, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2006) Long-term oncological results after laparoscopic, converted, and primary open procedures for rectal carcinoma: results of a multicenter observational study. Chirurg 77:709–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rottoli M, Bona S, Rosati R, Elmore U, Bianchi PP, Spinelli A, Bartolucci C, Montorsi M (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on short-term outcome and survival. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1279–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1,253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rottoli M, Stocchi L, Geisler DP, Kiran RP (2012) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 26:1971–1976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Haglind E, Kurlberg G, Rosenberg J, Lacy AM, Cuesta MA, D’Hoore A, Furst A et al (2009) COLOR II: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56:89–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nandakumar G, Fleshman JW (2010) Laparoscopy for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 19:793–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Deborah S. Keller, Ki-Jae Park, Knut-Magne Augestad, and Conor P. Delaney have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals-Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, 7 Lakeside, Cleveland, OH, 44106-5047, USA

    Deborah S. Keller, Ki-Jae Park & Conor P. Delaney

  2. Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Pusan, South Korea

    Ki-Jae Park

  3. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Norway University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsö, Norway

    Knut-Magne Augestad

Authors
  1. Deborah S. Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ki-Jae Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Knut-Magne Augestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Conor P. Delaney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah S. Keller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, D.S., Park, KJ., Augestad, KM. et al. Integration of open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer resection: oncologic and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 28, 2129–2136 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3444-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3444-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation