Skip to main content
Log in

Short-Term Outcome After Laparoscopic or Open Restorative Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Comparative Cohort Study

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

The laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer is still a controversial procedure. A comparative cohort study was conducted to assess short-term results of laparoscopic restorative mesorectal excision.

Methods

From January 1998 to December 2000, laparotomy was performed on all primary rectal cancer undergoing radical excision. From January 2002 to September 2004, all cases about to undergo radical excision were considered for laparoscopy. Patients with fixed tumor or T4, indications for synchronous hepatectomy, emergencies, and medical contraindications were not included. The study was based on the intention-to-treat principle.

Results

Short-term outcome was compared between the laparoscopy group (n=104) and the laparotomy group (n=68). Demographic, general and tumor data, and rates of preoperative irradiation were comparable, as were surgical procedures and perioperative management. Hospital mortality (1 and 2.9 percent, P=0.33) and three-month overall morbidity (43.3 and 48.5 percent, P=0.49) were comparable between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups. Surgical complication rates were comparable (39.3 and 35.5 percent, P=0.58), but a significantly lower medical complication rate was observed in laparoscopy patients (8.7 and 20.6 percent, P=0.025), mainly because this group had fewer respiratory complications. Hospital stay was shorter in laparoscopy patients (10 and 14 days, P<0.001). Oncologic quality criteria were comparable, in terms of number of lymph nodes, lateral and distal margins, and delivery of postoperative chemotherapy.

Conclusions

The laparoscopic approach to restorative mesorectal excision for cancer does not increase postoperative morbidity or reduce oncologic quality. Our results suggest that the short-term outcome is probably improved with this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NS Abraham JM Young MJ Solomon (2004) ArticleTitleMeta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer Br J Surg 91 1111–1124 Occurrence Handle15449261 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4640 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvnvFSmuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. InstitutionalAuthorNameClinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) ArticleTitleA comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer N Engl J Med 350 2050–2059 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa032651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. PJ Guillou P Quirke H Thorpe et al. (2005) ArticleTitleShort-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet 365 1718–1726 Occurrence Handle15894098 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. M Morino U Parini G Giraudo et al. (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients Ann Surg 237 335–342 Occurrence Handle12616116 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200303000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. J Leroy F Jamali L Forbes et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes Surg Endosc 18 281–289 Occurrence Handle14691716 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8877-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7kvFeluw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M Anthuber A Fuerst F Elser et al. (2003) ArticleTitleOutcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients Dis Colon Rectum 46 1047–1053 Occurrence Handle12907898 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7279-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. F Feliciotti M Guerrieri AM Paganini et al. (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients Surg Endosc 17 1530–1535 Occurrence Handle12874687 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3sngs1Oiug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. F Bretagnol E Rullier P Couderc et al. (2003) ArticleTitleTechnical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer Colorectal Dis 5 451–453 Occurrence Handle12925079 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00521.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szovVensg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. WW Tsang CC Chung MK Li (2003) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction for mid and low rectal cancers Br J Surg 90 867–871 Occurrence Handle12854115 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4105 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szitlGqtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. CG Moertel TR Fleming JS MacDonald et al. (1990) ArticleTitleLevamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma N Engl J Med 322 352–358 Occurrence Handle2300087 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c7js1Ohsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199002083220602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S Vithiananthan Z Cooper K Betten et al. (2001) ArticleTitleHybrid laparoscopic flexure takedown and open procedure for rectal resection is associated with significantly shorter length of stay than equivalent open resection Dis Colon Rectum 44 927–935 Occurrence Handle11496070 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02235478 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvkvFSisA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D Dindo N Demartines PA Clavien (2004) ArticleTitleClassification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 205–213 Occurrence Handle15273542 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. E Kapiteijn CA Marijnen ID Nagtegaal et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer N Engl J Med 345 638–646 Occurrence Handle11547717 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa010580 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvps1ektw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. CA Marijnen E Kapiteijn CJ Velde Particlevan de et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAcute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial J Clin Oncol 20 817–825 Occurrence Handle11821466 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.20.3.817 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fpt1enuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. JE Hartley BJ Mehigan AE Qureshi et al. (2001) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach Dis Colon Rectum 44 315–321 Occurrence Handle11289275 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234726 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7pvFyktw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H Scheidbach J Rose O Huegel et al. (2004) ArticleTitleResults of laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of 520 patients Tech Coloproctol 8 IssueIDSuppl 1 22–24 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10151-004-0102-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M Braga A Vignali L Gianotti et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome Ann Surg 236 759–766 Occurrence Handle12454514 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200212000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. L Bardram P Funch-Jensen H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitleRapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection Br J Surg 87 1540–1545 Occurrence Handle11091243 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01559.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltFOhsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ZG Zhou M Hu Y Li et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer Surg Endosc 18 1211–1215 Occurrence Handle15457380 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-003-9170-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. S Yamamoto M Watanabe H Hasegawa et al. (2002) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma Dis Colon Rectum 45 1648–1654 Occurrence Handle12473889 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7253-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. H Scheidbach C Schneider J Konradt et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum Surg Endosc 16 7–13 Occurrence Handle11961595 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8314-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383isFGmsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. EC Poulin CM Schlachta R Gregoire et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma Surg Endosc 16 989–995 Occurrence Handle12163970 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080182 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vgvFGlsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. O Schwandner TH Schiedeck C Killaitis et al. (1999) ArticleTitleA case-control-study comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal cancer Int J Colorectal Dis 14 158–163 Occurrence Handle10460907 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003840050203 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzptFyhtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, et al. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2005;3 [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Jessica Blanc for revising the manuscript and Professor E. Rullier, Professor B. Gayet, and Dr. G. Trebuchet for their surgical guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Lelong M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Lelong, B., Bege, T., Esterni, B. et al. Short-Term Outcome After Laparoscopic or Open Restorative Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Comparative Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 176–183 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0751-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0751-7

Key words

Navigation