Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Long-term outcome of patients with conversion following laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer has seldom been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of conversion on the operative outcome and survival of patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for colorectal malignancy.

Methods

An analysis of a prospectively collected database of 470 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy between May 2000 and December 2006 was performed. The operative results and long-term outcomes of patients with conversion were compared with those with successful laparoscopic operations.

Results

The overall conversion rate to open surgery was 8.7% (41 patients). There was no difference in age, comorbid illness, location of tumor, and stage of disease between the laparoscopic and conversion groups. The most common reasons for conversion include adhesions (34.1%), tumor invasion into adjacent structures (17.1%), bulky tumor (9.8%), and uncontrolled hemorrhage (9.8%). A male preponderance was observed in the conversion group. Tumor size was significantly larger in the conversion group compared with the laparoscopic group (5 versus 4 cm, P = 0.002). Although there was no difference in the operative time between the two groups, increased perioperative blood loss (461.9 vs. 191.2 ml, P < 0.001), increased postoperative complication rate (56.1% versus 16.7%, P = 0.001) and prolonged median hospital stay (10 versus 6 days, P < 0.001) were associated with the conversion group. Consequently, patients in the conversion group were more likely to develop local recurrence (9.8% versus 2.8%, P < 0.001) with a significantly reduced cumulative cancer-free survival.

Conclusion

The disease-free survival and the local recurrence were significantly worse by the presence of conversion in laparoscopic resection for colorectal malignancy. Adoption of a standardized operative strategy may improve the perioperative outcome after conversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR et al (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132(1):41–44; discussion 45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M et al (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15(8):827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2000) Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections. A simple clinical model. Surg Endosc 14(12):1114–1117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(2):197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19(1):47–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?. Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1680–1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20(6):947–951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):207–214; discussion 214–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139(1):39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M et al (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11(4):331–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 199(5):675–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Pokfulam Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Albert C. Y. Chan, Jensen T. C. Poon, Joe K. M. Fan, Siu Hung Lo & Wai Lun Law

Authors
  1. Albert C. Y. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jensen T. C. Poon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joe K. M. Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Siu Hung Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wai Lun Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wai Lun Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, A.C.Y., Poon, J.T.C., Fan, J.K.M. et al. Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22, 2625–2630 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9813-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9813-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation