Skip to main content
Log in

Management options for symptomatic stenosis after laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to determine the incidence, etiology, and management options for symptomatic stenosis (SS) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Methods

A retrospective study reviewed morbidly obese patients who underwent LSG between October 2008 and December 2010 to identify patients treated for SS.

Results

In this study, 230 patients (83% female) with a mean age of 49.5 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43 kg/m2 underwent LSG. In 3.5% of these patients (100% female; mean age, 42 years; mean BMI, 42.6 kg/m2), SS developed. The LSG procedure was performed using a 36-Fr. bougie and tissue-reinforced staplers. Four patients had segmental staple-line imbrication, and seven patients underwent contrast study, with 71.4% demonstrating a fixed narrowing. Endoscopy confirmed short-segment stenoses: seven located at mid-body and one located near the gastroesophageal junction. Endoscopic management was 100% successful. The mean number of dilations was 1.6, and the median balloon size was 15 mm. The mean time from surgery to initial endoscopic intervention was 48.8 days, and the mean time from the first dilation to toleration of a solid diet was 49.6 days. Two patients were referred to our institution after undergoing LSG at another facility. The mean time to the transfer was 28.5 days. The two patients had a mean age of 35 years and a mean BMI of 42.3 kg/m2. Both patients experienced immediate SS after perioperative complications comprising one staple-line hematoma and one leak. Contrast studies demonstrated minimal passage of contrast through a long-segment stenosis. Both patients underwent multiple endoscopic dilation procedures and endoluminal stenting, ultimately requiring laparoscopic conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The mean time from the initial surgery to the surgical revision was 77 days, and the mean time after the first intervention to tolerance of a solid diet was 82 days.

Conclusion

Symptomatic short-segment stenoses after LSG may be treated successfully with endoscopic balloon dilation. Long-segment stenoses that do not respond to endoscopic techniques may ultimately require conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hess DS, Hess DW (1998) Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg 8:267–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marceau P, Biron S, Bourque RA, Potvin M, Hould FS, Simard S (1993) Biliopancreatic diversion with a new type of gastrectomy. Obes Surg 3:29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M (2000) Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 10:514–523; discussion 524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, Pomp A (2003) Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super–super-obese patient. Obes Surg 13:861–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Milone L, Strong V, Gagner M (2005) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is superior to endoscopic intragastric balloon as a first stage procedure for super-obese patients (BMI ≥ 50). Obes Surg 15:612–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A, Rizzello M, Casella G, Leonetti F, Basso N (2006) Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on comorbidities in super-obese high-risk patients. Obes Surg 16:1138–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg 252:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Givon-Madhala O, Spector R, Wasserberg N, Beglaibter N, Lustigman H, Stein M, Arar N, Rubin M (2007) Technical aspects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 25 morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 17:722–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gluck B, Movitz B, Jansma S, Gluck J, Laskowski K (2010) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective bariatric procedure for the lower BMI (35.0–43.0 kg/m2) population. Obes Surg. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0332-7:03

  10. D’Hondt M, Vanneste S, Pottel H, Devriendt D, Van Rooy F, Vansteenkiste F (2011) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and the resulting quality of life, resolution of comorbidities, food tolerance, and 6-year weight loss. Surg Endosc 28(8):2498–2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubin M, Yehoshua RT, Stein M, Lederfein D, Fichman S, Bernstine H, Eidelman LA (2008) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with minimal morbidity: early results in 120 morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 18:1567–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tagaya N, Kasama K, Kikkawa R, Kanahira E, Umezawa A, Oshiro T, Negishi Y, Kurokawa Y, Nakazato T, Kubota K (2009) Experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid versus super morbid obesity. Obes Surg 19:1371–1376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tucker ON, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ (2008) Indications for sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for weight loss in the morbidly obese. J Gastrointest Surg 12:662–667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gagner M, Deitel M, Kalberer TL, Erickson AL, Crosby RD (2009) The second international consensus summit for sleeve gastrectomy, March 19–21, 2009. Surg Obes Rel Dis 5:476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frezza E, Reddy S, Gee LL, Wachtel MS (2009) Complications after sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 19:684–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brethauer S, Hammel J, Schauer P (2009) Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Rel Dis 5:469–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gagner M (2010) Leaks after sleeve gastrectomy are associated with smaller bougies: prevention and treatment strategies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:166–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lalor PF, Tucker ON, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R (2008) Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surgery Obes Rel Dis 4:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zundel N, Hernandez JD, Galvao Neto M, Campos J (2010) Strictures after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cottam D, Qureshi FG, Mattar SG, Sharma S, Holover S, Bonanomi G, Ramanathan R, Schauer P (2006) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 20:859–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lacy A, Ibarzabal A, Obarzabal A, Pando E, Adelsdorfer C, Delitala A, Corcelles R, Delgado S, Vidal J (2010) Revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:351–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J (2009) Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three different techniques. Obes Surg. doi:10.1007/s11695-009-0047-9

  23. Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J (2009) Laparoscopic seromyotomy for long stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch. Obes Surg 19:495–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. National Institutes of Health (1992) Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement. Am J Clin Nutr 55:615S–619S

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alley J, Fenton S, Harnisch MC, Angeletti MN, Peterson R (2010) Integrated bioabsorbable tissue reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 21(8):1311–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Demaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M, Winegar DA (2010) Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: designated bariatric surgery centers of excellence using the bariatric outcomes longitudinal database. Surg Obes Rel Dis 6:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bohdjalian A, Langer FB, Shakeri-Leidenmühler S, Gfrerer L, Ludvik B, Zacherl J, Prager G (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy as sole and definitive bariatric procedure: 5-year results for weight loss and ghrelin. Obes Surg 20:535–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Menenakos E, Stamou MK, Albanopoulos K, Papailiou J, Theodorou D, Leandros E (2009) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed with intent to treat morbid obesity: a prospective single-center study of 261 patients with a median follow-up of 1 year. Obes Surg 20(3):276–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nocca D, Krawczykowsky D, Bomans B, Noël P, Picot MC, Blanc PM, De Seguin De Hons C, Millat B, Gagner M, Monnier L, Fabre JM (2008) A prospective multicenter study of 163 sleeve gastrectomies: results at 1 and 2 years. Obes Surg 18:560–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Goitein D, Feigin A, Segal-Lieberman G, Goitein O, Papa MZ, Zippel D (2011) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional option after gastric band failure. Surg Endosc 23(7):1559–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Foletto M, Prevedello L, Bernante P, Luca B, Vettor R, Francini-Pesenti F, Scarda A, Brocadello F, Motter M, Famengo S, Nitti D (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding or gastroplasty. Surg Obes Rel Dis 6:146–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Parikh M, Gagner M, Heacock L, Strain G, Dakin G, Pomp A (2008) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes. Surg Obes Rel Dis 4:528–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Uglioni B, Wölnerhanssen B, Peters T, Christoffel-Courtin C, Kern B, Peterli R (2009) Midterm results of primary vs secondary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as an isolated operation. Obes Surg 19:401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Werquin C, Caudron J, Mezghani J, Leblanc-Louvry I, Scotté M, Dacher JN, Savoye-Collet C (2008) Early imaging features after sleeve gastrectomy. J Radiol 89:1721–1728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Goitein D, Goitein O, Feigin A, Zippel D, Papa M (2009) Sleeve gastrectomy: radiologic patterns after surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1559–1563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Eubanks S, Edwards CA, Fearing NM, Ramaswamy A, De La Torre RA, Thaler KJ, Miedema BW, Scott JS (2008) Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg 206:935–938; discussion 938–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Amit Parikh, Joshua B. Alley, Richard M. Peterson, Michael C. Harnisch, Jason M. Pfluke, Donovan M. Tapper, and Stephen J. Fenton have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government or their endorsement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Fenton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parikh, A., Alley, J.B., Peterson, R.M. et al. Management options for symptomatic stenosis after laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese. Surg Endosc 26, 738–746 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1945-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1945-1

Keywords

Navigation