Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication: a case for standardization

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Preoperative endoscopic assessment of the failed fundoplication is instrumental in diagnosis and surgical management. Endoscopy is a routine and essential part of the workup for a failed fundoplication, but no clear guidelines exist for reporting endoscopic findings. This study aimed to compare endoscopic findings reported by community physicians (gastroenterologists and surgeons) with the findings of the authors (esophageal center) for patients who underwent reoperative intervention after a previous antireflux procedure.

Methods

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent reoperation after a failed antireflux operation between 1 December 2003 and 30 June 2010. Endoscopic findings as reported by the outside physician and by the esophageal center endoscopist were reviewed and compared.

Results

During the study period, 229 patients underwent reoperation. Of these patients, 20 did not have endoscopy performed by an outside physician and were excluded from the study, leaving 208 patients. The endoscopic reports of the esophageal center physician included 97 cases of hiatal hernia (64 type 1 and 33 types 2 and 3), 52 slipped fundoplications, 61 disrupted fundoplications, 30 intrathoracic fundoplications, 25 twisted fundoplications, 14 two-compartment stomachs, and 27 cases of Barrett’s esophagus. Outside physicians identified 68% of the hiatal hernias and 61% of the paraesophageal hernias reported by the authors. Only 32% of the outside reports mentioned a previous fundoplication. Furthermore, only 17% of the slipped fundoplications and 30% of the disrupted fundoplications were so described. Outside physicians identified 19 of the 27 patients with Barrett’s esophagus.

Conclusion

Fundoplication changes described by the general endoscopist are inadequate. With an increasing population of patients who have undergone prior antireflux surgery, incorporation of fundoplication assessment in an endoscopic curriculum may be helpful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jay AP, Watson DI (2010) Changing work patterns for benign upper gastrointestinal and biliary disease: 1994–2007. ANZ J Surg 80:519–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Finks JF, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD (2006) The rise and fall of antireflux surgery in the United States. Surg Endosc 20:1698–1701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feussner H, Petri A, Walker S, Bollschweiler E, Siewert JR (1991) The modified AFP score: an attempt to make the results of antireflux surgery comparable. Br J Surg 78:942–946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lord RV, Kaminski A, Oberg S, Bowrey DJ, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Sillin LF, Peters JH, Crookes PF, DeMeester TR (2002) Absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a majority of patients taking acid suppression medication after Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 6:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatton PD, Selinkoff PM, Harford FJ Jr (1984) Surgical management of the failed Nissen fundoplication. Am J Surg 148:760–763

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Iqbal A, Awad Z, Simkins J, Shah R, Haider M, Salinas V, Turaga K, Karu A, Mittal SK, Filipi CJ (2006) Repair of 104 failed antireflux operations. Ann Surg 244:42–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Broeders JA, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Draaisma WA, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ, Gooszen HG (2009) Ten-year outcome of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication: randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 250:698–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M (1986) Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 204:9–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Galvani C, Fisichella PM, Gorodner MV, Perretta S, Patti MG (2003) Symptoms are a poor indicator of reflux status after fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: role of esophageal functions tests. Arch Surg 138:514–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Draaisma WA, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Broeders I, Smout AJ, Furnee EJ, Gooszen HG (2006) Five-year subjective and objective results of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 244:34–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Strate U, Emmermann A, Fibbe C, Layer P, Zornig C (2008) Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility. Surg Endosc 22:2095–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruiz-Tovar J, Diez-Tabernilla M, Chames A, Morales V, Martinez-Molina E (2010) Clinical outcome at 10 years after laparoscopic versus open Nissen fundoplication. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:21–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly JJ, Watson DI, Chin KF, Devitt PG, Game PA, Jamieson GG (2007) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: clinical outcomes at 10 years. J Am Coll Surg 205:570–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Collard JM, Verstraete L, Otte JB, Fiasse R, Goncette L, Kestens PJ (1993) Clinical, radiological, and functional results of remedial antireflux operations. Int Surg 78:298–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Soricelli E, Basso N, Genco A, Cipriano M (2009) Long-term results of hiatal hernia mesh repair and antireflux laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:2499–2504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussain A, Mahmood H, Singhal T, El-Hasani S (2010) Failed laparoscopic antireflux surgery and indications for revision: a retrospective study. Surgeon 8:74–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Furnée EJB, Draaisma WA, Boeders IA, Gooszen HG (2009) Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1539–1549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Vernon AH, Sandone C, Gopal DV, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Hill LD, Hunter JG (2004) Endoscopic appraisal of the gastroesophageal valve after antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 99:233–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Bafutto M, Machado CA (1995) Laparoscopic reoperations after failed and complicated antireflux operations. Surg Endosc 9:681–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Allen MS, Pairolero PC, Johnson JO, Larson DR (1997) Long-term results after reoperation for failed antireflux procedures. J Thorac Cardiocasc Surg 113:545–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wykypiel H, Kamolz T, Steiner P, Klingler A, Granderath FA, Pointner R, Wetscher GJ (2005) Austrian experiences with redo antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1315–1319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Makris KI, Lee T, Mittal SK (2009) Roux-en-Y reconstruction for failed fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2226–2232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spechler SJ (2004) The management of patients who have “failed” antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 99:552–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Arpad Juhasz, Abhishek Sundaram, Masato Hoshino, Tommy H Lee, Charles J Filipi, and Sumeet K Mittal have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumeet K. Mittal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juhasz, A., Sundaram, A., Hoshino, M. et al. Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication: a case for standardization. Surg Endosc 25, 3761–3766 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1785-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1785-z

Keywords

Navigation