Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and efficacious for the elderly: an analysis using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite increasing use of laparoscopic appendectomy, data demonstrating outcomes of this technique exclusively among the elderly population are scarce. This study aimed to compare 30-day postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay among elderly patients after appendectomy.

Methods

Appendicitis patients older than 65 years were extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database. Demographics and rates of complications for patients undergoing open and laparoscopic appendectomies were compared. Uni- and multivariate analyses adjusted for differences between groups compared the end points of major and minor complications as well as the days of hospital stay after initial surgery.

Results

A total of 3,335 patients underwent appendectomy, with 2,235 patients (67%) receiving a laparoscopic procedure. The open appendectomy patients were significantly older and more likely to have various preoperative comorbidities (p < 0.05). No difference in median operative time between the two techniques was found. Both required 51 min (p = 0.11). The open cases had higher rates of both major and minor postoperative complications than the laparoscopic cases (p < 0.0001), both overall and before discharge. Multivariate analysis showed no association between operative approach and major complications, and a reduced risk of minor complications with laparoscopy. Length of surgical stay was longer for the open group than for the laparoscopically treated group (median, 4 days vs 2 days; p < 0.05). After adjustment, laparoscopy still was significantly associated with a shorter hospital stay than open appendectomy (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for elderly patients. During the 30-day postoperative period, no correlation with major complications was found, and the findings showed a beneficial association with regard to minor complications. After adjustment for perioperative factors, laparoscopy is associated with a shorter hospital stay than open appendectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Census Bureau (2010) The elderly population. Retrieved 3 February 2010 at http://www.census.gov/population/www/pop-profile/elderpop.html

  2. Ciccone A, Allegra JR, Cochrane DG et al (1998) Age-related differences in diagnoses within the elderly population. Am J Emerg Med 16:43–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kauvar DR (1993) The geriatric acute abdomen. Clin Geriatr Med 9:547–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Franz MG, Norman J, Fabri PJ (1995) Increased morbidity of appendicitis with advancing age. Am Surg 61:40–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC (2003) What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 185:198–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JF, Leow CK, Lau WY (2000) Appendicitis in the elderly. Aust N Z J Surg 70:593–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2007) Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:245–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paranjape C, Dalia S, Pan J et al (2007) Appendicitis in the elderly: a change in the laparoscopic era. Surg Endosc 21:777–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2007 (2007) NIS data and documentation distributed by National Technical Information Service. NIS, Springfield, VA

  10. Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP et al (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–450

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED et al (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery 135:479–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harrell AG, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW et al (2006) Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Am Surg 72:474–480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleming F, Kim M, Messing S et al (2010) Balancing the risk of postoperative surgical infections: a multivariate analysis of factors associated with laparoscopic appendectomy from the NSQIP database. Ann Surg 252:895–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mary KinCannon, RN, for her assistance with interpretation of coding methods and data collection.

Disclosures

Rabih M. Salloum is on the speaker bureau for GlaxoSmithKline, and John R. T. Monson has received an honorarium as a speaker for Covidien. Michael J. Kim, Fergal J. Fleming, Douglas D. Gunzler, and Susan Messing have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

    Michael J. Kim, Fergal J. Fleming, Rabih M. Salloum & John R. T. Monson

  2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

    Douglas D. Gunzler & Susan Messing

Authors
  1. Michael J. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fergal J. Fleming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Douglas D. Gunzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susan Messing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rabih M. Salloum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. John R. T. Monson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, M.J., Fleming, F.J., Gunzler, D.D. et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and efficacious for the elderly: an analysis using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. Surg Endosc 25, 1802–1807 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1467-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1467-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation