Skip to main content
Log in

Appendicitis in the elderly: a change in the laparoscopic era

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Appendicitis in elderly patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early and correct diagnosis together with minimally invasive surgery can lead to more favorable outcomes than occurred in the prelaparoscopic era.

Methods

A retrospective review of 116 elderly patients (age > 60) from 1999 to 2004 is compared with the authors’ previously published studies from 1978 to 1988 (n = 96) and from 1988 to 1998 (n = 113), respectively.

Results

In our current series (1999–2004), more cases were managed laparoscopically (n = 68) than with open surgery (n = 48). Perforated appendicitis cases resulted in significantly longer hospital stays, more complications, and longer operating time than nonperforated cases. The laparoscopic cases had significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay and fewer complications than open cases, and comparable operating times. As compared with our previous studies from 1978 to 1988) and from 1988 to 1998, the current series (1999–2004) consists of patients presenting with fewer classical symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) scanning was more accurate in the current study and more routinely used. The patients in the current series had more correct preoperative diagnoses. Perforated appendicitis was encountered less frequently and associated with fewer complications. The 4% mortality rate in the previous two series decreased to less than 1% in this series.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive surgery combined with increased use and accuracy of preoperative CT scans has changed the clinical management of acute appendicitis in elderly patients, leading to decreased lengths of stay, decreased mortality, and more favorable outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foley TA, Earnest F IV, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Radiology 235: 89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED, Muhlbaier LH, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery 135: 479–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hardin DM Jr (1999) Acute appendicitis: review and update. Am Fam Physician 60: 2027–2034

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Horattas MC, Guyton DP, Wu D (1990) A reappraisal of appendicitis in the elderly. Am J Surg 160: 291–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hui TT, Major KM, Avital I, Hiatt JR, Margulies DR (2002) Outcome of elderly patients with appendicitis: effect of computed tomography and laparoscopy. Arch Surg 137: 995–998; discussion 999–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kouwenhoven EA, Repelaer van Driel OJ, van Erp WF (2005) Fear for the intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: not realistic. Surg Endosc 19: 923–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JF, Leow CK, Lau WY (2000) Appendicitis in the elderly. Aust N Z J Surg 70: 593–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lunca S, Bouras G, Romedea NS (2004) Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors, and outcomes. Rom J Gastroenterol 13: 299–303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miki T, Ogata S, Uto M, Nakazona T, Urata M, Ishibe R, Shinyama S, Nakajo M (2005) Enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its severity. Radiat Med 23: 242–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg 92: 298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen DB, Silen W, Hodin RA (1999) Appendectomy in the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras. J Gastrointest Surg 3: 67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 19: 1193–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338: 141–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rub R, Margel D, Soffer D, Kulger Y (2000) Appendicitis in the elderly: what has changed? Isr Med Assoc J 2: 220–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC (2003) What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 185: 198–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R, Katkhouda N, Chan L, Berne T (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 20: 495–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ (2005) Role of leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Am Surg 71: 344–347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Paranjape.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paranjape, C., Dalia, S., Pan, J. et al. Appendicitis in the elderly: a change in the laparoscopic era. Surg Endosc 21, 777–781 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9097-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9097-4

Keywords

Navigation