Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP) is one of the most accepted laparoscopic procedures in the field of pancreatic surgery. However, pancreatic fistula remains a major and frequent complication in Lap-DP, as in open surgery. The aim of this retrospective study is to clarify the advantages of prolonged peri-firing compression (PFC) with a linear stapler for prevention of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
Patients and methods
Incidence of pancreatic fistula in clinical levels (equivalent to grades B and C defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF)) was retrospectively compared between patients who underwent Lap-DP with PFC (PFC group, n = 17) and those who underwent Lap-DP without PFC (no-PFC group, n = 25).
Results
Incidence of clinical pancreatic fistula was significantly lower in the PFC group than in the no-PFC group. Consistent with the results for pancreatic fistula, peritoneal drainage period and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the PFC group than in the no-PFC group.
Conclusions
Our data show that PFC effectively prevents pancreatic fistula and shortens postoperative hospital stay after Lap-DP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tanaka M, Shimizu S, Mizumoto K, Yokohata K, Chijiiwa K, Yamaguchi K, Ogawa Y (2001) Laparoscopically assisted resection of choledochal cyst and Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Surg Endosc 15(6):545–552
Ogawa T, Shimizu S, Mizumoto K, Uchiyama A, Yokohata K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in patients with cardiac valve replacement. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8(2):158–160
Shimizu S, Yokohata K, Mizumoto K, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M (2002) Laparoscopic choledochotomy for bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9(2):201–205
Noshiro H, Shimizu S, Nagai E, Ohuchida K, Tanaka M (2003) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial for patients of heavier weight? Ann Surg 238(5):680–685
Shimizu S, Nakashima N, Okamura K, Hahm JS, Kim YW, Moon BI, Han HS, Tanaka M (2006) International transmission of uncompressed endoscopic surgery images via superfast broadband Internet connections. Surg Endosc 20(1):167–170
Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc 22(10):2261–2268
Misawa T, Shiba H, Usuba T, Nojiri T, Uwagawa T, Ishida Y, Ishii Y, Yanaga K (2008) Safe and quick distal pancreatectomy using a staggered six-row stapler. Am J Surg 195(1):115–118
Sheehan MK, Beck K, Creech S, Pickleman J, Aranha GV (2002) Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation? Am Surg 68(3):264–267 discussion 267–268
Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92(5):539–546
Shimizu S, Tanaka M, Konomi H, Mizumoto K, Yamaguchi K (2004) Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: current indications and surgical results. Surg Endosc 18(3):402–406
Shimizu S, Tanaka M, Konomi H, Tamura T, Mizumoto K, Yamaguchi K (2004) Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy after division of the splenic vessels. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14(3):173–177
Warshaw AL (1988) Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 123(5):550–553
Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Huang ZS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2007) Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg 245(3):443–451
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13
Yamaguchi K, Chijiwa K, Shimizu S, Yokohata K, Tanaka M (1998) Litmus paper helps detect potential pancreatoenterostomy leakage. Am J Surg 175(3):227–228
Sugiyama M, Abe N, Izumisato Y, Tokuhara M, Masaki T, Mori T, Atomi Y (2001) Pancreatic transection using ultrasonic dissector in pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 182(3):257–259
Pachter HL, Pennington R, Chassin J, Spencer FC (1979) Simplified distal pancreatectomy with the Auto Suture stapler: preliminary clinical observations. Surgery 85(2):166–170
Kajiyama Y, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Akiyama H (1996) Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases. Br J Surg 83(12):1711
Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T, Sekihara M, Hara T, Kori T, Nakajima H, Kuwano H (2003) Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg 73(11):922–925
Palanivelu C, Shetty R, Jani K, Sendhilkumar K, Rajan PS, Maheshkumar GS (2007) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results of a prospective non-randomized study from a tertiary center. Surg Endosc 21(3):373–377
Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Kanematsu T (2005) Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12(4):283–285
Okano K, Kakinoki K, Yachida S, Izuishi K, Wakabayashi H, Suzuki Y (2008) A simple and safe pancreas transection using a stapling device for a distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15(4):353–358
Morita K, Tokunou K, Hiraki S, Kudo A, Fukuda S, Masaaki O (2006) The effects of waiting time after clamp of a linear automatic stapling instrument in small bowel resection of a pig. JSES 11(4):461–463
Disclosures
Authors M. Nakamura, J. Ueda, H. Kohno, M.Y.F. Aly, S. Takahata, S. Shimizu, and M. Tanaka have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakamura, M., Ueda, J., Kohno, H. et al. Prolonged peri-firing compression with a linear stapler prevents pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 25, 867–871 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1285-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1285-6