Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in patients with cardiac valve replacement

  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

To evaluate the benefits and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with cardiac valve replacement (which frequently leads to cholelithiasis), 12 patients with cholelithiasis associated with cardiac valve replacement were studied. The patients were divided into two groups, of 6 patients each, according to the type of operation performed, open cholecystectomy (OC) or LC. The postoperative course was monitored with respect to laboratory data on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 7. The mean duration of operation, blood loss, days to food resumption, length of hospital stay, and morbidity were compared between the two groups. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between the OC and LC groups in white blood cell counts on POD 1 (12 980 ± 3040/mm3 vs 8300 ± 1590/mm3), days to food resumption (2.7 ± 0.4 days vs 1.0 ± 0.7 days), and length of postoperative stay (15.8 ± 1.0 days vs 10.8 ± 1.6 days). There were no complications in the LC group, but 1 patient in the OC group had heart failure postoperatively. Our findings indicate the efficacy and safety of LC in patients with cardiac valve replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: August 14, 2000 / Accepted: December 22, 2000

About this article

Cite this article

Ogawa, T., Shimizu, S., Mizumoto, K. et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in patients with cardiac valve replacement. J Hep Bil Pancr Surg 8, 158–160 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340170040

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340170040

Navigation