Abstract
Background
A web-based survey was conducted among colorectal surgeons who represented members of both SAGES and ASCRS to find out how they define conversion for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Methods
Questionnaires were designed based on MCQs, including three parts: surgeon information, different definitions for conversion, and four different clinical scenarios. Surgeons were asked to choose the best definition(s).
Results
325 (28.5%) of 1,140 surgeons, 28.5% responded; approximately half of them were part of private-based practices. Fifty-three percent had more than 10 years experience; 35.9% performed more than 50 laparoscopic colon cases per year, 12% performed more than 25 laparoscopic rectal cases per year, and 60% less than 10. The majority (68.4%) agreed that any incision made earlier than planned is conversion. Whereas 81.4% felt that incision >5 cm is not a conversion, only 53.4% considered incision >10 cm a conversion, and 37% did not. Neither extracorporeal vessel ligation (73.8%), bowel resection (81.2%), anastomosis (77%), or incision made for specimen retrieval (91.1%) was counted as conversion. In clinical case scenarios, 62% found an incision made to facilitate phlegmon dissection after laparoscopically mobilizing the left colon up to and around the splenic flexure to be laparoscopic-assisted. A 10-cm incision required for fistula take down after finishing laparoscopic dissection was defined as conversion (55.6%). A 10-cm incision made for the rectal dissection in rectopexy was described as conversion in 51% and laparoscopic-assisted in 48%. Increasing a 5–12-cm for specimen extraction, 49.3% was declared a laparoscopic-assisted case.
Conclusions
It was considered clear that any incision made earlier than planned a conversion, whereas extra corporeal vessel ligation, bowel resection and anastomosis were not. However, there seem to be many views of conversion regarding incision length, and some clinical situations that might influence outcome among different centers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2006) A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases. Am J Surg 191(3):377–380
Gendall KA et al (2007) The impact of obesity on outcome after major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50(12):2223–2237
Guillou PJ et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726
(2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059
Veldkamp R et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484
Person B, Vivas DA, Wexner SD (2006) Totally laparoscopic low anterior resection with transperineal handsewn colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(4):700–702
Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20(6):947–951
Chan AC et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22(12):2625–2630
Franko J et al (2008) Conversion of laparoscopic colon resection does not affect survival in colon cancer. Surg Endosc 22(12):2631–2634
Gervaz P et al (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15(8):827–832
Gonzalez R et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(2):197–204
Moloo H et al (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735
Braga M et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 242(6):890–896
Laurent C et al (2007) Laparoscopic approach in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94(12):1555–1561
Agha A et al (2008) Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:409–417
Schlachta CM et al (2000) Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections. A simple clinical model. Surg Endosc 14(12):1114–1117
Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19(1):47–54
Hartley JE et al (2001) Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44(3):315–321
Tsang WW, Chung CC, Li MK (2003) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction for mid and low rectal cancers. Br J Surg 90(7):867–871
Gellman L, Salky B, Edye M (1996) Laparoscopic assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc 10(11):1041–1044
Franklin ME Jr et al (1996) Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 39(10 Suppl):S35–S46
Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Bruch H (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13(2):151–156
Wexner SD et al (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases. Surg Endosc 10(2):133–136
Beart RW Jr (1994) Laparoscopic colectomy: status of the art. Dis Colon Rectum 37(2 Suppl):S47–S49
Agachan F et al (1996) Intraoperative laparoscopic complications. Are we getting better? Dis Colon Rectum 39(10 Suppl):S14–S19
Ramos JM et al (1995) Role of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. A prospective evaluation of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 38(5):494–501
Zmora O et al (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with decreased postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction. Surg Endosc 23(1):87–89
Marcello PW et al (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51(6):818–826
Garrett KA et al (2008) A single training center’s experience with 200 consecutive cases of diverticulitis: can all patients be approached laparoscopically? Surg Endosc 22(11):2503–2508
Singh R et al (2008) Can community surgeons perform laparoscopic colorectal surgery with outcomes equivalent to tertiary care centers? Surg Endosc 23(2):283–288
Acknowledgments
We thank all surgeons who participated in this survey and who gave us their honest feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shawki, S., Bashankaev, B., Denoya, P. et al. What is the definition of “conversion” in laparoscopic colorectal surgery?. Surg Endosc 23, 2321–2326 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0329-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0329-2