Skip to main content
Log in

Total mesorectal excision: Assessment of the laparoscopic approach

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Total mesorectal excision offers the lowest reported rates of local recurrence for rectal cancer; however, the ability to perform total mesorectal excision laparoscopically remains unproven. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and adequacy of a totally laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. METHODS: A prospective review of all patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by a single surgeon was undertaken. These were compared with a control group undergoing open rectal resections by another colorectal consultant in the unit (n=22). Comparison of total specimen length, longitudinal and radial excision margins, and lymph node yield was made between groups. RESULTS: Of 42 laparoscopic-assisted rectal resections attempted, 14 (33 percent) were converted to open procedures and six had their dissection completed open. One resection was considered noncurative. Twenty-one total mesorectal excisions (50 percent) were completed totally laparoscopically. No significant difference was detected between groups for specimen length, radial margin, or lymph node yield. Longitudinal margin of excision was longer in the laparoscopic group (4 (3.5–5)vs. 2.5 (1.05–3.5) cm;P=0.02, Mann-Whitney). Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (180 (168–218)vs. 125 (104–144) minutes;P=0.003, Mann-Whitney). Data are medians (inter-quartile ranges). Four patients in the laparoscopic-assisted group had clinical anastomotic leakagevs. one in the open group (P=0.329, Fisher's exact test). At median follow-up of 38 (range, 6–53) months, one local recurrence had occurred in each group and crude mortality rates were 29 and 23 percent in the laparoscopic-assisted and open groups, respectively (P=0.736, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: Totally laparoscopic excision of the mesorectum is feasible in 50 percent of patients and where possible yields histologic parameters comparable to open surgery. Early survival and recurrence figures also appear to be comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Monson J, Darzi A, Carey P, Guillou P. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 1992;340:831–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dean PA, Beart RW Jr, Nelson H, Elftmann TD, Schlinkert RT. Laparoscopic-assisted segmental colectomy: early Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 1994;69:834–40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffman G, Baker J, Fitchett C, Vansant J. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experience. Ann Surg 1994;219:732–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD,et al. Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zucker KA, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Ford RS. Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection. Surg Endosc 1994;8:12–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips E, Franklin M, Carroll B, Fallas M, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 1992;216:703–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guillou P, Darzi A, Monson J. Experience with laparoscopic colorectal surgery for malignant disease. Surg Oncol 1993;2(Suppl 1):43–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Ye TM, Cattey RP, Henry LG. Laparoscopically assisted colon resections compare favourably with open technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nduka CC, Monson JR, Menzies-Gow N, Darzi A. Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 1994;81:648–52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wexner SD, Cohen SM. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 1995;82:295–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture. Br J Surg 1984;71:12–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993;341:457–60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O'Rourke NA, Heald RJ. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1993;80:1229–30.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heald RJ, Goligher JC. Anterior resection of the rectum. In: Fielding LP, Goldberg SM, eds. Rob and Smith's operative surgery. Surgery of the colon, rectum and anus. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993:456–71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Darzi A, Hill AD, Henry MM, Guillou PJ, Monson JR. Laparoscopic assisted surgery of the colon. Operative technique. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1993;1:13–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Monson JR, Darzi A. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Oxford: Isis Medical Media, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Lancet 1986;2:996–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tate JJ, Kwok S, Dawson JW, Lau WY, Li AK. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and conventional anterior resection. Br J Surg 1993;80:1396–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG,et al. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 1994;344:707–11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Darzi A, Lewis C, Menzies-Gow N, Guillou PJ, Monson JR. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Surg Endosc 1995;9:414–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Milson JW, Lavery IC, Church JM, Stolfi VM, Fazio VW. Use of laparoscopic techniques in colorectal surgery: preliminary study. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:215–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wexner SD, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:651–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wexner S, Cohen S, Johansen O, Nogueras J, Jagelman D. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 1993;80:1602–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hartley JE, Qureshi A, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer—a test of the surgeon not the equipment [abstract]. Br J Surg 1995;82:693.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Drs. Hartley and Mehigan are University Research Fellows supported by Autosuture UK.

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Washington, D.C., May 1 to 6, 1999.

About this article

Cite this article

Hartley, J.E., Mehigan, B.J., Qureshi, A.E. et al. Total mesorectal excision: Assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 315–321 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234726

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234726

Key words

Navigation