Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mini-invasive techniques have revolutionized surgery, but the superiority of laparoscopic access for appendectomy is widely debated. The authors analyze their monocentric experience with 1,347 laparoscopic appendectomies.

Methods

Between October 1991 and December 2002, all the patients with an indication for appendectomy underwent surgery (301 emergency and 1,046 interval appendectomies) using the laparoscopic approach.

Results

For 1,248 patients, appendectomy was performed laparoscopically, whereas for 99 patients (7.3%), it was converted to an open procedure because of technical reasons (90 patients, 6.7%) or intraoperative complications (9 patients, 0.6%). For 59 patients (4.4%), the appendectomy was associated with another procedure. Histology showed “acute” alterations in 261 of the 301 emergency surgeries and in 148 of the 1,046 elective operations. Postoperative complications arose in 37 patients (2.7%), with 5 patients (0.3%) requiring invasive treatment. The mean postoperative stay was 30 h.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy offers unquestionable advantages, but it is not yet considered the “gold standard” for appendiceal pathology. Many centers reserve it for selected patients (e.g., obese patients and women suspected of having other pathologies). No randomized trials or metaanalyses have definitively proved its superiority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson DG, Edelman DS (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: a single-institution study. JSLS 1(4):323–324

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Attwood SEA, Hill ADK, Murphy PG (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chevalier J, Durand A (1980) Reflexions sur une série homogène de 3,200 appendicectomies. Lyon Chir 76: 251–253

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chung RS, Rowland DY, Le P, Diaz J (1999) A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 117: 250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20: 263–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Croce E, Olmi S, Azzola M, Russo R (1999) Laparoscopic appendectomy and minilaparoscopic approach: a retrospective review after eight years’ experience. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3: 285–292

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (1995) The EAES Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Surg Endosc 9: 550–563

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219: 725–731

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Metaanalysis of controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9: 17–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186: 545–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gotz F, Pier A, Bacher C (1990) Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery: a report of 338 operations. Surg Endosc 4: 6–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239: 43–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20: 17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plews A Sweenwy J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg 39: 457–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12: 1204–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffnet H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 86: 48–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Henle KP, Beller S, Rechener J, Zerz A, Szinic G, Klinger A (1996) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurg 67: 526–530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissel C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12: 940–943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kazemier G, De Zeew GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kluiber RM, Hartsman B (1996) Laparoscopic appendectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 39: 1008–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? Surg Endosc 11: 95–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Riedel HH (1990) Sequelae of appendicectomy with special reference to intraabdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest 29: 241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lorenz EP, Ehren G, Schmid M, Soop J, Konradt J (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy as standard procedure: technique and outcome in 409 patients. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4): 97–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernandez E, Nieto B (1997) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 335–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 222: 256–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maxwell JG, Robinson CL, Maxwell TG, Maxwell BG, Smith CR, Brinker C (2001) Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Am J Surg 182: 687–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins TBS, Helton SW (1996) A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 171: 533–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McCall JL, Sharpless K, Jadallah F (1997) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84: 1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Meynaud-Kraemer L, Colin C, Vergnon P, Barth X (1999) Wound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 15: 380–391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JC, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2004) Open and laparascopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18: 242–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ortega AE, Hunter JC, Peters JH (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ozmen MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Tanik A, Kale IT (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9: 187–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E (1997) Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Br J Surg 84: 842–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery: still of interest? Surg Endosc 16: 1192–1196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Halthausen U, Neugebaner EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383: 289–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbulh L (2000) A nation’s experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy. Am J Surg 180: 73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schirmer BD, Schmierg RE, Dix J, Edge SB, Hanks JB (1993) Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg 165: 670–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15: 59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Slim R, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1998) Laparascopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 398–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tate JJT, Dawnson JW, Chung SCS, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342: 633–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42: 377–383

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ure BM, Bax NM, Van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35: 1170–1173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Valla JS, Limonne B, Valla V (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 166–172

    Google Scholar 

  45. Valla JS, Ordorica Flores RM, Steyaert H, Merrot T, Barteles AM, Brean J, Ginier C, Cheli M (1999) Umbilical one-puncture laparascopic-assisted appendectomy. Surg Endosc 13: 83–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Valla JS, Steyaert H (1999) Laparoscopic appendicectomy in children in endoscopic surgery. Spinger Verlag, Berlin, New York pp 234–253

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Milan, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS, Via Francesco Sforza, 35, 20122, Milan, Italy

    G. C. Roviaro, C. Vergani, M. Francese & M. Maciocco

  2. Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Giuseppe FbF, A.Fa.R., Milan, Italy

    F. Varoli & R. Caminiti

Authors
  1. G. C. Roviaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Vergani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Varoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Francese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Caminiti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Maciocco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. C. Roviaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roviaro, G.C., Vergani, C., Varoli, F. et al. Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook. Surg Endosc 20, 1526–1530 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0021-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0021-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation