Abstract
PURPOSE: A randomized, controlled trial is considered to be the “gold standard” to evaluate a new procedure. Thus, this critical review assessed whether the published randomized trials on laparoscopic appendectomy show that it is superior to the open approach. METHODS: Twelve original articles involving a randomized, controlled trial on laparoscopic appendectomy in adults published between January 1990 and December 1996 were selected. We studied first whether each trial was positive (a procedure is superior to the other) or negative (no difference). We reviewed for each trial the methodology used and the following outcomes: operating time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, time until resumption of diet, postoperative pain, hospital stay, cost, and quality of life analyses. Post-operative morbidity was considered as the major primary outcome. RESULTS: There were six positive and six negative trials. Postoperative complication rates were similar, but the two approaches had specific potential complications, wound infections following open appendectomy, and intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic appendectomy. This review failed to show a superiority of the laparoscopy for the other outcomes, particularly postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: Differences in positive trials concerned subjective and controversial outcomes, and the flaw in negative trials was their lack of power. Thus, nothing is definitively well established, even after 12 randomized trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Pezet D, Chipponi J. Analysis of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1997;84:610–4.
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:255–65.
Moher D, Dulberg CS, Wells GA. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1994;272:122–4.
Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopicvs. open appendectomy. Surgery 1992;112:497–501.
Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, Tekant Y, Issac JR. Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 1993;80:1599–600.
Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK. Laparoscopicvs. open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 1993;342:633–7.
Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE,et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing openvs. laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 1994;219:725–31.
Hebebrand D, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Neugebauer E, Schwalm T, Günther MW. Laparoskopische oder klassische appendektomie? Eine prospektiv randomisierte studie. Chirurg 1994;65:112–20.
Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B, the Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 1995;169:208–12.
Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL,et al. Openvs. laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 1995;222:256–62.
Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J,et al. Prospective randomized comparison of openvs. laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 1996;20:263–6.
Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, Fenoglio ME. Laparoscopicvs. open appendectomy. South Med J 1996;89:668–74.
Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A,et al. Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 1996;120:71–4.
Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL. Laparoscopicvs. open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 1996;20:17–21.
Henle KP, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Szinicz G, Klinger A. Laparoskopischevs. konventionelle appendektomie: eine prospektive, randomisierte studie. Chirurg 1996;67:526–30.
Baigrie RJ, Dehn TC, Fowler SM, Dunn DC. Analysis of 8651 appendicectomies in England and Wales during 1992. Br J Surg 1995;82:933.
Velanovich V, Satava R. Balancing the normal appendicectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg 1992;58:264–9.
Clavien P-A, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992;111:518–26.
Frizelle FA, Hanna GB. Pelvic abscess following laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 1996;10:947–8.
Lejus C, Delile L, Plattner V,et al. Randomized, singleblinded trial of laparoscopicvs. open appendectomy in children: effects on postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 1996;84:801–6.
Ramesh S, Galland RB. Early discharge from hospital after open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 1993;80:1192–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Slim, K., Pezet, D. & Chipponi, J. Laparoscopic or open appendectomy?. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 398–403 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237500
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237500