Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy

A randomized clinical trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscop Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: A randomized clinical trial was performed to compare open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).

Methods: 201 patients with similar characteristics of appendicitis were randomized to either OA or LA. Operative time and technique, reintroduction of diet, postoperative pain, use of analgesia, hospital stay, and complications were documented.

Results: 104 patients were allocated to the OA group and 97 to the LA group. Postoperative pain was significantly less in the LA group on the 1st (p < 0.001) and 2nd (p < 0.001) postoperative day, resulting in less use of analgesics on both days (p < 0.001). Restoration of diet was similar in both groups. Mean operative time was longer in the LA group: 61 vs 41 min (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications did not differ in either group, except for wound infections (six OA group vs zero LA group, p < 0.05). Mean hospital stay was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: LA results in less postoperative pain and fewer wound infections. The laparoscopic procedure is technically more demanding to perform, resulting in longer operative time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kazemier, G., de Zeeuw, G., Lange, J. et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 11, 336–340 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900358

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900358

Navigation