Skip to main content
Log in

Elucidating the binding efficacy of β-galactosidase on graphene by docking approach and its potential application in galacto-oligosaccharide production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herein, we propose the synthesis and characterization of graphene for the immobilization of β-galactosidase for improved galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS) production. The size of synthesized graphene was observed to be 25 nm by TEM analysis while interaction of enzyme with the nanosupport was observed by FTIR spectroscopy. Docking was obtained using molecular docking program Dock v.6.5 while the visual analyses and illustration of protein–ligand complex were investigated by utilizing chimera v.1.6.2 and PyMOL v.1.3 softwares. Immobilized β-galactosidase (IβG) showed improved stability against various physical and chemical denaturants. K m of IβG was increased to 6.41 mM as compared to 2.38 mM of soluble enzyme without bringing significant change in V max value. Maximum GOS content also registered an increase in lactose conversion. The maximum GOS production was achieved by immobilized enzyme at specific temperature and time. Hence, the developed nanosupport can be further exploited for developing a biosensor involving β-galactosidase or for immobilization of other industrially/therapeutically important enzymes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GO:

Graphene oxide

GOS:

Galacto-oligosaccharides

IβG:

Immobilized β-galactosidase

SβG:

Soluble β-galactosidase

References

  1. Kiehl K, Straube T, Opwis K, Gutmann JS (2015) Strategies for permanent immobilization of enzymes on textile carriers. Eng Life Sci 15:622–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohamad NR, Marzuki NHC, Buang NA, Huyop F, Wahab RA (2015) An overview of technologies for immobilization of enzymes and surface analysis techniques for immobilized enzymes. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 29:205–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Homaei AA, Sariri R, Vianello F, Stevanato R (2013) Enzyme immobilization: an update. J Chem Biol 6:185–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ansari SA, Husain Q (2012) Potential application of enzymes immobilized on/in nano materials: a review. Biotechnol Adv 30:512–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cipolatti EP, Silva MJA, Klein MP, Federn V, Feltes MMC, Oliveira JV (2014) Current status and trends in enzymatic nanoimmobilization. J Mol Catal B Enzym 99:56–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fei L, Perrett S (2009) Effect of nanoparticles on protein folding and fibrillogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 10:646–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goenka S, Sant V, Sant S (2014) Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J Control Release 173:75–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Soldano C, Mahmood A, Dujardin E (2010) Production, properties and potential of graphene. Carbon 48:2127–2150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh V, Joung D, Zhai L, Das S, Khondaker SI, Seal S (2011) Graphene based materials: past, present and future. Prog Mat Sci 56:1178–1271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, Hobza P, Zboril R, Kim KS (2012) Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and application. Chem Rev 112:6156–6214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hauser AS, Windshugel B (2016) A benchmark data set for assessment of peptide docking performance. J Chem Inf Mod. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00234

    Google Scholar 

  12. Panneerselvam S, Choi S (2014) Nanoinformatics: emerging databases and available tools. Int J Mol Sci 15:7158–7182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Suresh PS, Kumar A, Kumar R, Singh VP (2008) An insilico approach to bioremediation: laccase as a case study. J Mol Graph Mod 26:845–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morris GM, Huey R, Olson AJ (2008) Using autoDock for ligand-receptor docking. Curr Protoc Bioinform 8(8):14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang ST, Wang H, Guo L, Gao Y, Liu Y, Cao A (2008) Interaction of fullerenol with lysozyme investigated by experimental and computational approaches. Nanotechnology 19:395101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diez-Municio M, Herrero M, Olano A, Moreno FJ (2014) Synthesis of novel bioactive lactose-derived oligosaccharides by microbial glycoside hydrolases. Microb Biotechnol 7:315–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Otieno DO (2010) Synthesis of β-galactooligosaccharides from lactose using microbial β-galactosidases. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:471–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao X, Liu L, Li X, Zeng J, Jia X, Liu P (2014) Biocompatible graphene oxide nanoparticle-based drug delivery platform for tumor microenvironment-responsive triggered release of doxorubicin. Langmuir 30:10419–10429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ewing TJ, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID (2001) DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aid Mol Des 15:411–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. DeLano WL (2002) The PyMOL molecular graphics system. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM (1995) LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng 8:127–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Laskowski RA, Swindells MB (2011) LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 51:2778–2786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ansari SA, Satar R, Zaidi SK (2015) Carboxylation of silver nanoparticles for the immobilization of β-galactosidase and its efficacy in galacto-oligosaccharides production. Quim Nova 38:387–392

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fai AEC, Postore GM (2015) Galactooligosaccharides: production, health benefits, application to foods and perspectives. Agropecuaria 6:69–81

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neri DFM, Balcao VM, Costa RS, Rocha ICAP, Ferreria EMFC, Torres DPM, Rodriguez LRM, Carvalho LB Jr, Teixeria JA (2009) Galacto-oligosaccharides production during lactose hydrolysis by free Aspergillus oryzae β-galactosidase and immobilized on magnetic polysiloxane-polyvinyl alcohol. Food Chem 115:92–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Srivastava G, Singh K, Talat M, Srivastava ON, Kayastha AM (2014) Functionalized graphene sheets as immobilization matrix for fenugreek β-amylase: enzyme kinetics and stability studies. PLoS ONE 9:e113408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsu CA, Lee SL, Chou CC (2007) Enzymatic production of galactooligosaccharides by beta-galactosidase from Bifidobacterium longum BCRC 15708. J Agric Food Chem 21:2225–2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Barbara RC, Miguel AA, Lucia FA, Roseri B, Ana P, Jesus JB, Dietmar H, Antonio OO, Maria FL, Francisco JP (2011) Production of galacto-oligosaccharides by β-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces lactis: comparative analysis of permeabilized cells versus soluble enzyme. J Agric Food Chem 59:10477–10484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Warmerdam A, Boom RM, Janssen AEM (2013) β galactosidase stability at high substrate concentrations. Springer Plus 2:402–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Palai T, Kumar A, Bhattacharya BK (2015) Kinetic studies and model development for the formation of galacto-oligosaccharides from lactose using synthesized thermo-responsive bioconjugates. Enzym Microb Technol 70:42–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Albayrak N, Yang ST (2002) Production of galacto-oligosaccharides from lactose by Aspergillus oryzae beta-galactosidase immobilized on cotton cloth. Biotechnol Bioeng 5:8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pruksasri S, Nguyen TH, Haltrich D, Novalin S (2015) Fractionation of a galacto-oligosaccharides solution at low and high temperature using nanofiltration. Sep Purif Technol 4:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sen P, Bhattacharjee C, Bhattacharya P (2016) Experimental studies and two-dimensional modeling of a packed bed bioreactor used for production of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) from milk whey. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. doi:10.1007/s00449-015-1516-2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Prof. Waseem Ahmad (Center of Excellence in Genomic and Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia) for going through the manuscript critically and suggesting relevant changes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shakeel Ahmed Ansari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Satar, R., Ismail, S.A., Rehan, M. et al. Elucidating the binding efficacy of β-galactosidase on graphene by docking approach and its potential application in galacto-oligosaccharide production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39, 807–814 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1560-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1560-6

Keywords

Navigation