Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A population model for predicting the successful establishment of introduced bird species

  • Global change ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the strongest generalities in invasion biology is the positive relationship between probability of establishment and the numbers of individuals introduced. Nevertheless, a number of significant questions remain regarding: (1) the relative importance of different processes during introduction (e.g., demographic, environmental, and genetic stochasticity, and Allee effects); (2) the relative effects of propagule pressure (e.g., number of introductions, size of introductions, and lag between introductions); and (3) different life history characteristics of the species themselves. Here, we adopt an individual-based simulation modeling approach to explore a range of such details in the relationship between establishment success and numbers of individuals introduced. Our models are developed for typical exotic bird introductions, for which the relationship between probability of establishment and the numbers of individuals introduced has been particularly well documented. For both short-lived and long-lived species, probability of establishment decreased across multiple introductions (compared with a single introduction of the same total size), and this decrease was greater when inbreeding depression was included. Sensitivity analyses revealed four predictors that together accounted for >95 % of model performance. Of these, R 0 (the average number of daughters produced per female over her lifetime) and propagule pressure were of primary importance, while random environmental effects and inbreeding depression exerted lesser influence. Initial founder size is undoubtedly going to be important for ensuring the persistence of introduced populations. However, we found the demographic traits, which influence how introduced individuals behave, to have the greatest effect on establishment success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackburn TM, Cassey P (2004) Are introduced and re-introduced species comparable? A case study of birds. Anim Conserv 7:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lockwood JL (2009a) The role of species traits in the establishment success of exotic birds. Glob Change Biol 15:2852–2860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Lockwood JL, Cassey P (2009b) Avian Invasions: the ecology and evolution of exotic birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brook BW (2004) Australasian bird invasions: accidents or history? Ornithol Sci 3:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Bradshaw CJA (2008) Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol Evol 23:453–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P (2001) Determining variation in the success of New Zealand land birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Sol D, Duncan RP, Lockwood JL (2004) Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S405–S408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Duncan RP, Lockwood JL (2008) Lessons from introductions of exotic species as a possible information source for managing translocations of birds. Wildlife Res 35:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8:1023–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De’ath G (2007) Boosted trees for ecological modeling and prediction. Ecology 88:243–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis B (2002) Allee effects in stochastic populations. Oikos 96:389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Jerde CL (2009) Stochastic models of propagule pressure and establishment. In: Keller RP, Lodge DM, Lewis MA, Shogren JF (eds) Bioeconomics of invasive species: integrating ecology, economics, policy, and management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 83–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Lodge DM (2006) Allee effects, propagule pressure and the probability of establishment: risk analysis for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Baggenstos P, Lodge DM (2005) Propagule pressure and persistence in experimental populations. Biol Lett 1:480–483

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RP (1997) The role of competition and introduction effort in the success of passeriform birds introduced to New Zealand. Am Nat 149:903–915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RP, Bomford M, Forsyth DM, Conibear L (2001) High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geographical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate. J Anim Ecol 70:621–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Sol D (2003) The ecology of bird introductions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:71–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang K-T, Li R, Sudjianto A (2006) Design and modeling for computer experiments. Chapman & Hall/CRC

  • Fauvergue X, Vercken E, Malausa T, Hufbauer RA (2012) The biology of small, introduced populations, with special reference to biological control. Evol Appl 5:424–443

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2004) A Primer of Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH, Meulman JJ (2003) Multiple additive regression trees with application in epidemiology. Stat Med 22:1365–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gertzen EL, Leung B, Yan ND (2011) Propagule pressure, Allee effects and the probability of establishment of an invasive species (Bythotrephes longimanus). Ecosphere 2(3):art30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin ME, Soulé ME (1986) Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RE (1997) The influence of numbers released on the outcome of attempts to introduce exotic bird species to New Zealand. J Anim Ecol 66:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH, Perrins CM (1978) Inbreeding and dispersal in the great tit. Nature 271:52–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grevstad FS (1999) Factors influencing the chance of population establishment: implications for release strategies in biocontrol. Ecol Appl 9:1439–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haccou P, Iwasa Y (1995) Optimal mixed strategies in stochastic environments. Theor Popul Biol 47:212–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haccou P, Vatutin V (2003) Establishment success and extinction risk in autocorrelated environments. Theor Popul Biol 64:303–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haydar D, Wolff WJ (2011) Predicting invasion patterns in coastal ecosystems: relationship between vector strength and vector tempo. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 431:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes K, Barry SC (2008) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol Invasions 10:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J (2011) Dismo: species distribution modeling. R package version 0.7–2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo

  • Hopper KR, Roush RT (1993) Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions. Ecol Entomol 18:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppsson T, Forslund P (2012) Can life history predict the demographic stochasticity on extinction risk. Am Nat 179:706–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerde CL, Lewis MA (2007) Waiting for Invasions: a framework for the arrival of nonindigenous species. Am Nat 170:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerde CL, Bampfylde CJ, Lewis MA (2009) Chance establishment for sexual semelparous species: overcoming the Allee effect. Am Nat 173:734–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston EL, Piola RF, Clark GF (2009) The role of propagule pressure in invasion success. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Ecological Studies, vol 204. Springer, Berlin, pp 133–152

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer AM, Drake JM (2010) Experimental demonstration of population extinction due to a predator-driven Allee effect. J Anim Ecol 79:633–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy RC (2000) Structure of the VORTEX simulation model for population viability analysis. Ecol Bull 48:191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1993) Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am Nat 142:911–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre S, Clobert J, Moller AP, Sorci G (1999) Demographic stochasticity and social mating system in the process of extinction of small populations: the case of passerines introduced to New Zealand. Am Nat 153:449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold A, Bascompte J (2003) The Allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species. Ecol Lett 6:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller PS, Lacy RC (2005) VORTEX: a stochastic simulation model of the extinction process. Version 9.50 User’s Manual. Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC/IUCN), Apple Valley

  • Nuñez MA, Moretti A, Simberloff D (2011) Propagule pressure hypothesis not supported by an 80-year experiment on woody species invasion. Oikos 120:1311–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, Frankham R (2006) Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Conserv 133:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1991) The balance of nature? University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowse TAAP, Johnson CN, Lacy RC, Bradshaw CJA, Pollak JP, Watts MJ, Brook BW (2013) No need for disease: testing extinction hypotheses for the thylacine using multi-species metamodels. J Anim Ecol 82:355–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Ballou JD, Templeton A (1988) Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conserv Biol 2:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E, Bakke Ø (2000) Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81:642–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther B-E et al (2004) Life history variation predicts the effects of demographic stochasticity on avian population dynamics. Am Nat 164:793–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt TR, Pyšek P (2011) Mechanisms of plant invasions of North American and European grasslands. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şekercioğlu ÇH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2004) Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:18042–18047

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D et al (2012) Unraveling the life history of successful invaders. Science 337:580–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (ed) (1987) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP (1999) What is the Allee effect? Oikos 87:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CM, Hastings A (2005) Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol Lett 8:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingley R, Phillips BL, Shine R (2011) Establishment success of introduced amphibians increases in the presence of congeneric species. Am Nat 177:382–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin PC, Berec L, Liebhold AM (2011) Exploiting Allee effects for managing biological invasions. Ecol Lett 14:615–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veltman CJ, Nee S, Crawley MJ (1996) Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. Am Nat 147:542–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86:3212–3218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates AG, Schooler SS, Garono RJ, Buckley YM (2012) Biological control as an invasion process: disturbance and propagule pressure affect the invasion success of Lythrum salicaria biological control agents. Biol Invasions 14:255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

PC, TAAP, and TMB formulated the idea for the study and designed the analyses. TAAP conducted the simulations, and TAAP and PC conducted the statistical analyses. PC, TAAP, and TMB wrote the manuscript. Communicated by Ola Olsson. We are grateful to BW Brook for insightful discussions that greatly improved this manuscript. Comments from Ola Olsson and two anonymous referees were gratefully received. PC is an ARC Future Fellow (FT0991420).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia

    Phillip Cassey & Thomas A. A. Prowse

  2. Institute of Zoology, ZSL, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK

    Tim M. Blackburn

Authors
  1. Phillip Cassey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas A. A. Prowse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tim M. Blackburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip Cassey.

Additional information

Communicated by Ola Olsson.

PC, TAAP, and TMB formulated the idea for the study and designed the analyses. TAAP conducted the simulations, and TAAP and PC conducted the statistical analyses. PC, TAAP, and TMB wrote the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

442_2014_2902_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Supplementary material 1 Fig. S1 Partial dependency plots (on the logit-scale) derived from boosted regression tree (BRT) analysis of the sensitivity analysis output for single introduction scenarios only (see the selected model in Table 3 of the main text). The BRT model was fitted with simulation outcome (establishment success or failure) as the response and used ten simulation parameters as predictors of the outcome: net reproductive rate (R 0, calculated from the survival and fertility rates specified) and all other non-demographic simulation parameters that were varied in the sensitivity analysis. Each of these individual partial dependency plots assumes unplotted parameters are set at their mean values. The relative influence of each predictor in the fitted BRT model is shown in brackets on the x-axis. (JPEG 3934 kb)

442_2014_2902_MOESM2_ESM.jpg

Supplementary material 2 Fig. S2 Partial dependency plots (on the logit-scale) derived from boosted regression tree (BRT) analysis of the sensitivity analysis output for multiple introduction scenarios only (see the selected model in Table 3 of the main text). The BRT model was fitted with simulation outcome (establishment success or failure) as the response and used twelve simulation parameters as predictors of the outcome: net reproductive rate (R 0, calculated from the survival and fertility rates specified) and all other non-demographic simulation parameters that were varied in the sensitivity analysis. Each of these individual partial dependency plots assumes unplotted parameters are set at their mean values. The relative influence of each predictor in the fitted BRT model is shown in brackets on the x-axis. (JPEG 4365 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassey, P., Prowse, T.A.A. & Blackburn, T.M. A population model for predicting the successful establishment of introduced bird species. Oecologia 175, 417–428 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2902-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2902-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation