Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Propagule Pressure: A Null Model for Biological Invasions

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 September 2007

Abstract

Invasion ecology has been criticised for its lack of general principles. To explore this criticism, we conducted a meta-analysis that examined characteristics of invasiveness (i.e. the ability of species to establish in, spread to, or become abundant in novel communities) and invasibility (i.e. the susceptibility of habitats to the establishment or proliferation of invaders). There were few consistencies among invasiveness characteristics (3 of 13): established and abundant invaders generally occupy similar habitats as native species, while abundant species tend to be less affected by enemies; germination success and reproductive output were significantly positively associated with invasiveness when results from both stages (establishment/spread and abundance/impact) were combined. Two of six invasibility characteristics were also significant: communities experiencing more disturbance and with higher resource availability sustained greater establishment and proliferation of invaders. We also found that even though ‘propagule pressure’ was considered in only ~29% of studies, it was a significant predictor of both invasiveness and invasibility (55 of 64 total cases). Given that nonindigenous species are likely introduced non-randomly, we contend that ‘propagule biases’ may confound current paradigms in invasion ecology. Examples of patterns that could be confounded by propagule biases include characteristics of good invaders and susceptible habitats, release from enemies, evolution of ‘invasiveness’, and invasional meltdown. We conclude that propagule pressure should serve as the basis of a null model for studies of biological invasions when inferring process from patterns of invasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • HG Baker, Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: HG Baker and GL Stebbins (eds.) The Genetics of Colonizing Species. New York, USA: Academic Press (1965) pp. 147-169

    Google Scholar 

  • HG Baker, The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5 (1974) 1-24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAJ Buchan and DK Padilla, Predicting the likelihood of Eurasian watermilfoil presence in lakes, a macrophyte monitoring tool. Ecological Applications 10 (2000) 1442-1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MJW Burke and JP Grime, An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77 (1996) 776-790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JT Carlton, Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: the biology of ballast water. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 23 (1985) 313-371

    Google Scholar 

  • JT Carlton, Pattern, process and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biological Conservation 78 (1996) 97-106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P Cassey, Are there body size implications for the success of globally introduced land birds. Ecography 24 (2001) 413-420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P Cassey, TM Blackburn, KE Jones and JL Lockwood, Mistakes in the analysis of exotic species establishment: source pool designation and correlates of introduction success among parrots (Aves: Psittaciformes) of the world. Journal of Biogeography 31 (2004) 277-284

    Google Scholar 

  • JF Clements, Birds of the World: a Checklist. Vista: Ibis (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI (2005) Are characteristics of introduced salmonid fishes biased by propagule pressure? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences: 62: In Press.

  • RI Colautti and HJ MacIsaac, A neutral terminology to define invasive species. Diversity and Distributions 10 (2004) 135-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, Muirhead JR, Biswas RN and MacIsaac HJ (2005) ‘Realized’ vs. ‘apparent’ reduction in enemies of the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Biological Invasions In Press.

  • RI Colautti, AJ Niimi, CDA Overdijk van, EL Mills, K Holeck and HJ MacIsaac, Spatial and temporal analysis of transoceanic shipping vectors to the Great Lakes. In: JT Carlton, GM Ruiz and RN Mack (eds.) Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies. Washington, USA: Island Press (2004a) pp. 227-246

    Google Scholar 

  • RI Colautti, A Ricciardi, IA Grigorovich and HJ MacIsaac, Does the enemy release hypothesis predict invasion success?. Ecology Letters 7 (2004b) 721-733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CR Darwin, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London, UK: John Murray (1859).

    Google Scholar 

  • MA Davis and M Pelsor, Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecology Letters 4 (2001) 421-428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RP Duncan, The role of competition and introduction effort in the success of passeriform birds introduced to New Zealand. American Naturalist 149 (1997) 903-915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RP Duncan and TM Blackburn, Morphological over-dispersion in game birds (Aves : Galliformes) successfully introduced to New Zealand was not caused by interspecific competition. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4 (2002) 551-561

    Google Scholar 

  • RP Duncan, TM Blackburn and D Sol, The ecology of bird introductions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34 (2003) 71-98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RP Duncan, M Bomford, DM Forsyth and L Conibear, High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geographical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate. Journal of Animal Ecology 70 (2001) 621-632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PR Ehrlich, Attributes of invaders and the invading process: vertebrates. In: JA Drake, HA Mooney, F di Castri, RH Groves, FJ Kruger, M Rejmánek and M Williamson (eds.) Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons (1989) pp. 315-328

    Google Scholar 

  • CS Elton, The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London, UK: Methuen and Company (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • DM Forsyth and RP Duncan, Propagule size and the relative success of exotic ungulate and bird introductions to New Zealand. American Naturalist 157 (2001) 583-595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AJ Gray, Do invading species have definable genetic characteristics?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 314 (1986) 655-674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FS Grevstad, Experimental invasions using biological control introductions: the influence of release size on the chance of population establishment. Biological Invasions 1 (1999) 313-323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IA Grigorovich, RI Colautti, EL Mills, KH Holeck, A Ballert and HJ MacIsaac, Ballast-mediated animal introductions in the Great Lakes: retrospective and prospective analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60 (2003) 740-756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JP Grover, Assembly rules for communities of nutrient limited plants and specialist herbivores. American Naturalist 143 (1994) 258-282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A Hector, B Schmid, C Beierkuhnlein, MC Caldeira, M Diemer, PG Dimitrakopoulos, JA Finn, H Freitas, HS Giller, J Good, R Harris, P Högberg, K Huss-Danell, J Joshi, A Jumpponen, C Körner, PW Leadley, M Loreau, A Minns, CPH Mulder, G O’Donovan, SJ Otway, JS Pereira, A Prinz, DJ Read, M Scherer-Lorenzen, ED Schulze, ASD Siamantziouras, EM Spehn, AC Terry, AY Troumbis, FI Woodward, S Yachi and JH Lawton, Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286 (1999) 1123-1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KR Hopper and RT Roush, Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions. Ecological Entomology 18 (1993) 321-331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA Huston, LW Aarssen, MP Austin, BS Cade, JD Fridley, E Garnier, JP Grime, J Hodgson, WK Lauenroth, K Thompson, JH Vandermeer and DA Wardle, No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science 289 (2000) 1255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RM Keane and MJ Crawley, Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 (2002) 164-170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CS Kolar and DM Lodge, Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (2001) 199-204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CS Kolar and DM Lodge, Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298 (2002) 1233-1236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CE Lee, Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 (2002) 386-391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EA Leger and KJ Rice, Invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica Cham.) grow larger than native individuals under reduced competition. Ecology letters 6 (2003) 257-264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JM Levine, Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288 (2000) 852-854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JM Levine, Local interactions, dispersal, and native and exotic plant diversity along a California stream. Oikos 95 (2001) 397-408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JM Levine and CM D’Antonio, Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87 (1999) 15-26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JM Levine and CM D’Antonio, Forecasting biological invasion with increasing international trade. Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 322-326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JL Lockwood, Using taxonomy to predict success among introduced avifauna: relative importance of transport and establishment. Conservation Biology 13 (1999) 560-567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JL Lockwood and ML McKinney, Biotic Homogenization. New York, USA: Kluwer (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • DM Lodge, Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8 (1993) 133-137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WM Lonsdale, Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80 (1999) 1522-1536

    Google Scholar 

  • WM Lonsdale and AM Lane, Tourist vehicles as vectors of weed seeds in Kakadu National Park, Northern Australia. Biological Conservation 69 (1994) 277-283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K Lui, FL Thompson and CG Eckert, Causes and consequences of extreme variation in reproductive strategy and vegetative growth among invasive populations of a clonal aquatic plant, Butomus umbellatus L. (Butomaceae). Biological Invasions 6 (2004) 1-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HJ MacIsaac, IA Grigorovich and A Ricciardi, Reassessment of species invasion concepts: the Great Lakes basin as a model. Biological Invasions 3 (2001) 405-416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RN Mack, Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 78 (1996) 107-121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RN Mack and M Erneberg, The United States naturalized flora: largely the product of deliberate introductions. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89 (2002) 176-189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J McGrady-Steed, PM Harris and PJ Morin, Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390 (1997) 162-165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J Memmot, SJ Fowler and RL Hill, The effect of release size on the probability of establishment of biological control agents: gorse thrips (Sericothrips staphylinus) released against gorse (Ulex europaeus) in New Zealand. Biocontrol Science and Technology 8 (1998) 103-115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TE Miller, JM Kneitel and JH Burns, Effects of community structure on invasion success and rate. Ecology 83 (2002) 898-905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EL Mills, JH Leach, JT Carlton and CL Secor, Exotic species in the Great Lakes: a history of biotic crises and anthropogenic introductions. Journal of Great Lakes Research 19 (1993) 1-54

    Google Scholar 

  • CE Mitchell and AG Power, Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421 (2003) 625-627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PB Moyle and T Light, Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biological Conservation 78 (1996) 149-161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SH Reichard and CW Hamilton, Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology 11 (1997) 193-203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M Rejmánek, Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25 (2000) 497-506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A Ricciardi, Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: evidence of ‘invasional meltdown’ in the Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58 (2001) 2513-2525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A Ricciardi and HJ MacIsaac, Recent mass invasion of the North American Great Lakes by Ponto-Caspian species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15 (2000) 62-65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DM Richardson, Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conservation Biology 12 (1998) 18-26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DM Richardson, P Pyšek, M Rejmánek, MG Barbour, FD Panetta and CJ West, Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6 (2000) 93-107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M Rouget and DM Richardson, Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semi mechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental variables. American Naturalist 162 (2003) 713-724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GM Ruiz, PW Fofonoff, JT Carlton, MJ Wonham and AH Hines, Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematics 31 (2000) 481-531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K Shea and P Chesson, Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14 (2002) 170-176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JB Shurin, Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81 (2000) 3074-3086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D Simberloff, Introduced insects: a biogeographic and systematic perspective. In: HA Mooney and JA Drake (eds.) Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. New York, USA: Springer–Verlag (1986) pp. 3-26

    Google Scholar 

  • D Simberloff, Which insect introductions succeed and which fail?. In: JA Drake, HA Mooney, F Castri di, RH Groves, FJ Kruger, M Rejmanek and M Williamson (eds.) Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective. New York, USA: Wiley (1989) pp. 61-75

    Google Scholar 

  • D Simberloff and B Holle Von, Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown. Biological Invasions 1 (1999) 21-32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D Simberloff, MA Relva and M Nunez, Introduced species and management of a Nothofagus/Austrocedrus forest. Environmental Management 31 (2003) 263-275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • RR Sokal and FJ Rohlf, Biometry. New York: W.H. Freeman (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • D Sol and L Lefebvre, Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos 90 (2000) 599-605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JJ Stachowicz, RB Whitlatch and RW Osman, Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286 (1999) 1577-1579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ME Torchin, KD Lafferty and AM Kuris, Release from parasites as natural enemies: increased performance of a globally introduced marine crab. Biological Invasions 3 (2003) 333-345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KC Tucker and DM Richardson, An expert system for␣screening potentially invasive alien plants in South African fynbos. Journal of Environmental Management 44 (1995) 309-338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J Ruijven Van, GB Deyn De and F Berendse, Diversity reduces invisibility in experimental plant communities: the role of plant species. Ecology Letters 6 (2003) 910-918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CJ Veltman, S Nee and MJ Crawley, Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. The American Naturalist 147 (1996) 542-557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M Vilà and J Pujadas, Land-use and socio-economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biological Conservation 100 (2001) 397-401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M Williamson, Biological Invasions. London UK: Chapman Hall (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • MJ Wonham, JT Carlton, GM Ruiz and LD Smith, Fish and ships: relating dispersal frequency to success in biological invasions. Marine Biology 136 (2000) 1111-1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada

    Robert I. Colautti, Igor A. Grigorovich & Hugh J. MacIsaac

Authors
  1. Robert I. Colautti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor A. Grigorovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hugh J. MacIsaac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert I. Colautti.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9007-7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colautti, R.I., Grigorovich, I.A. & MacIsaac, H.J. Propagule Pressure: A Null Model for Biological Invasions. Biol Invasions 8, 1023–1037 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-3735-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-3735-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation