Skip to main content
Log in

Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi

  • Ecosystem Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the great interest concerning the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem functioning, there is virtually no knowledge as to how the diversity of decomposer microbes influences the decomposition rate of soil organic matter. We established a microcosm study in which the number of soil fungi was investigated in relation to the system’s ability to (i) degrade raw coniferous forest humus, and (ii) use resources that were either added to the systems or released into the soils after a disturbance (drought). With the exception of the most diverse treatment, in each of the six replicates of each of the six diversity treatments (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 or 43 taxa), fungal taxa were randomly chosen from a pool of 43 commonly isolated fungal species of raw humus. Two months after initiation of the study CO2 production increased as fungal diversity increased, but in the species-poor end of the diversity gradient only. Addition of various energy resources to the microcosms generally increased the level of soil respiration but did not affect the shape of the diversity-CO2-production curve. Rewetting the soil after severe drought resulted in a rapid flush of CO2, particularly in the most diverse communities. The biomass of the fungi in the non-disturbed soils, and soil NH4-N concentration and soil pH in both disturbed and non-disturbed systems were slightly but significantly higher in the diverse than in the simple systems. Fungal species richness had no influence on the organic matter content of the humus at the end of the experiment. The results suggest that the functional efficiency of fungal communities can increase with the number of fungal taxa. This diversity effect was, however, significant at the species-poor end of the diversity gradient only, which implies considerable functional equivalency (redundancy) among the decomposer fungi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen LW (1997) High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80:183–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrén O, Bengtsson J, Clarholm M (1995) Biodiversity and species redundancy among litter decomposers. In: Collins HP, Robertson GP, Klug MJ (eds) The significance and regulation of soil biodiversity. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 141–151

  • Atlas RM, Bartha R (1998) Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications. Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Schulze E-D, Mooney HA (1992) Biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 7:107–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P, Pacala S, Neuhauser C (2001) Environmental niches and ecosystem functioning. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 213–245

  • Cox P, Wilkinson SP, Anderson JM (2001). Effects of fungal inocula on the decomposition of lignin and structural polysaccharides in Pinus sylvestris litter. Biol Fertil Soils 33:246–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon JW (1985) Decomposition of filter paper cellulose by thermophilic fungi acting singly, in combination, and in sequence. Trans Br Mycol Soc 85:663–669

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer W, Gerards S, Klein Gunnewiek PJA, Modderman R (1999) Response of the chitinolytic microbial community to chitin amendments of dune soils. Biol Fertil Soils 29:170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degens BP (1998) Decreases in microbial functional diversity do not result in corresponding changes in decomposition under different moisture conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1989–2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Degens BP, Harris JA (1997) Development of a physiological approach to measuring the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1309–1320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson T-H (1993) Compendium of soil fungi, vol 1. IHW, Eching

  • Emmerson MC, Raffaelli DG (2000) Detecting the effects of diversity on measures of ecosystem function: experimental design, null models and empirical observations. Oikos 91:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Gochenaur SE (1984) Fungi of a Long Island oak-birch forest. II. Population dynamics and hydrolase patterns for the soil penicillia. Mycologia 76:218–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould WD, Bryant RJ, Trofymow JA, Anderson RV, Elliott ET, Coleman DC (1981) Chitin decomposition in a model soil system. Soil Biol Biochem 13:487–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DH (1994) Fungal physiology, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

  • Griffith GS, Rayner ADM, Wildman HG (1994) Interspecific interactions and mycelial morphogenesis of Hypholoma fasciculare (Agaricaceae). Nova Hedwig 59:47–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Bardgett RD, Cook R, Christensen S, Ekelund F, Sorensen SJ, Bååth E, Bloem J, de Ruiter PC, Dolfing J, Nicolardot B (2000) Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship. Oikos 90:279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Hector A (2001) Biodiversity and the functioning of grassland ecosystems: multi-site comparisons. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 71–95

  • Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R, Högberg P, Huss-Danell K, Joshi J, Jumpponen A, Körner C, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O’Donovan G, Otway SJ, Pereira JS, Prinz A, Read DJ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze E-D, Siamantziouras A-SD, Spehn EM, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi S, Lawton, J (1999) Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286:1123–1127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Alexander IJ, Gooday GW (1995) Chitinolytic enzymes of pathogenic and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycol Res 99:935–941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU (1998) The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology 79:704–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1997) The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1302–1305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulot FD, Lacroix G, Lescher-Moutoue FO, Loreau M (2000) Functional diversity governs; ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment. Nature 405:340–344

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA, Aarssen LW, Austin M P, Cade BS, Fridley JD, Garnier E, Grime JP, Hodgson J, Lauenroth WK, Thompson K, Vandermeer JH, Wardle DA (2000) No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science 289:1255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe PA (2000) The replacement series. J Ecol 88:371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick B (1985) The fifth kingdom. Mycologue, Waterloo

  • Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (2001) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper TW, Verschoor BC (1995) Enhancement of nitrification rates in vitro by interacting species of saprotrophic fungi. Mycol Res 99:1128–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • Laakso J, Setälä H (1999) Sensitivity of primary production to changes in the architecture of belowground food webs. Oikos 87:57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler SP, Armesto JJ, Kareiva P (2001) How relevant to conservation are studies linking biodiversity and ecosystem functioning? In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 294–313

  • Liiri M, Setälä H, Haimi J, Pennanen T, Fritze H (2002) Relationships between soil microarthropod species diversity and plant growth does not change when the system is disturbed. Oikos 96:137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5632–5636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons KG, Schwartz MW (2001) Rare species loss alters ecosystem function—invasion resistance. Ecol Lett 4:358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin S, Sanchis V, Ramos AJ, Vinas I, Magan N (1998) Environmental factors, in vitro interactions, and niche overlap between Fusarium moniliforme, F. proliferatum , and F. graminearum, Aspergillus and Penicillium species from maize grain. Mycol Res 102:831–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrady-Steed J, Harris PM, Morin PJ (1997) Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390:162–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikola J, Setälä H (1998) Relating species diversity to ecosystem functioning: mechanistic backgrounds and experimental approach with a decomposer food web. Oikos:83:180–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S (1998) Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv Biol 12:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Li S (1997) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacala S, Tilman D (2002) The transition from sampling to complementarity. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 151–174

  • Parkinson D (1994) Filamentous fungi. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis. 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 329–350

  • Rayner ADM (1994) Pattern-generating processes in fungal communities. In: Ritz K, Dighton J, Giller KE (eds) Beyond the Biomass. British Society of Soil Sciences, Wiley-Sayce, New York

  • Robinson CH, Dighton J, Frankland JC, Coward PA (1993) Nutrient and carbon dioxide release by interacting species of straw-decomposing fungi. Plant Soil 151:139–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Kabana R, Godoy G, Morgan-Jones G, Shelby RA (1983) The determination of soil chitinase activity: conditions for assay and ecological studies. Plant Soil 75:95–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Parkinson D (1994) Changes in bacterial and fungal biomass C, bacterial and fungal biovolume and ergosterol content after drying, remoistening and incubation of different layers of cool temperate forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1515–1525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel JP, Gulledge JM, Clein-Curley JS, Lindstrom JE, Braddock JF (1999) Moisture effects on microbial activity and community structure in decomposing birch litter in the Alaskan taiga. Soil Biol Biochem 31:831–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze E-D, Mooney HA (1994) Ecosystem function of biodiversity: a summary. In: Schultze E-D, Mooney HA (eds). Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 498–510

  • Schwartz MW, Brigham CA, Hoeksema JD, Lyons KG, Mills MH, van Mantgem PJ (2000) Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundman V, Nase L (1972) The synergistic ability of some wood-degrading fungi to transform lignins and lignosuphonates on various media. Archiv Mikrobiol 86:339–348

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems, 1st edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

  • Tilman D (1999) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–1474

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman DA, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718–720

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman DA, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997) Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1857–1861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P (2001) Experimental and observational studies of diversity, productivity, and stability. In: Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity: empirical progress and theoretical extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 42–70

  • Veldkamp H (1955) A study of the aerobic decomposition of chitin by microorganisms. Meded Landbouwhogesch Wageningen/Nederland 55:127–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH (1992) Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol 6:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall D H, Moore J C (1999) Interactions underground—soil biodiversity, mutualism, and ecosystem processes. BioScience 49:109–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1999) Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships. Oikos 87:403–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (2002) Communities and ecosystems: linking the aboveground and belowground components. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Parkinson D (1990). Comparison of physiological techniques for estimating the response of the microbial biomass to soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 22:817–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Barker KM, Yeates GW, Nicholson KS, Bardgett RN, Watson RN, Ghani A (1999) Plant removals in perennial grassland: vegetation dynamics, decomposers, soil biodiversity and ecosystem properties. Ecol Monogr 69:535–568

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Leena Kontiola, Mustapha Boucelham and Marja Kurkela are thanked for their help with establishing and taking care of the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heikki Setälä.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Setälä, H., McLean, M.A. Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi. Oecologia 139, 98–107 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1478-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1478-y

Keywords

Navigation