Skip to main content
Log in

Targeting sources of drought tolerance within an Avena spp. collection through multivariate approaches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Planta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we find and characterize the sources of tolerance to drought amongst an oat (Avena sativa L.) germplasm collection of 174 landraces and cultivars. We used multivariate analysis, non-supervised principal component analyses (PCA) and supervised discriminant function analyses (DFA) to suggest the key mechanism/s responsible for coping with drought stress. Following initial assessment of drought symptoms and area under the drought progress curve, a subset of 14 accessions were selected for further analysis. The collection was assessed for relative water content (RWC), cell membrane stability, stomatal conductance (g 1), leaf temperature, water use efficiency (WUE), lipid peroxidation, lipoxygenase activity, chlorophyll levels and antioxidant capacity during a drought time course experiment. Without the use of multivariate approaches, it proved difficult to unequivocally link drought tolerance to specific physiological processes in the different resistant oat accessions. These approaches allowed the ranking of many supposed drought tolerance traits in the order of degree of importance within this crop, thereby highlighting those with a causal relationship to drought stress tolerance. Analyses of the loading vectors used to derive the PCA and DFA models indicated that two traits involved in water relations, temperature and RWC together with the area of drought curves, were important indicators of drought tolerance. However, other parameters involved in water use such as g 1 and WUE were less able to discriminate between the accessions. These observations validate our approach which should be seen as representing a cost-effective initial screen that could be subsequently employed to target drought tolerance in segregating populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUCPC:

Area under the conductance progress curve

AUDPC:

Area under the drought progress curve

CMS:

Cell membrane stability

daww:

Days after withholding water

DFA:

Discriminant function analysis

g 1 :

Stomatal conductance

IR:

Infrared

LOX:

Lipoxigenase activity

LP:

Lipid peroxidation

PCA:

Principal components analysis

RWC:

Relative water content

SCMR:

SPAD chlorophyll meter reading

WUE:

Water use efficiency

References

  • Araus JL (1996) Integrative physiological criteria associated with yield potential. In: Reinolds MP, Rajaram S, McNab A (eds) Increasing yield potential in wheat: breaking the barriers. CIMMYT, Mejico, pp 150–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002) Plant breeding and drought in C-3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann Bot 89:925–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asada K (1992) Ascorbate peroxidase: a hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzyme in plants. Physiol Plant 85:235–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A re-examination of relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Austr J Biol Sci 15:413–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Roychoudhury A, Saha PP, Sengupta DN (2010) Differential antioxidative responses of indica rice cultivars to drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 60:51–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (1999) Towards standard assays of drought resistance in crop plants. In: Ribaut JM, Poland D (eds) Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. A strategic planning workshop held at CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico. CIMMYT, Mexico, pp 29–35

  • Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Austr J Agric Res 56:1159–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A, Ebercon A (1981) Cell-membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 21:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Causton DR (1987) A biologist’s advanced mathematics. Allen and Unwin, London, p 326

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaouki AF, Chakroun M, Allagui MB, Sbeita A (2004) Fodder oats in the Maghreb. In: Suttie JM, Reynolds SG (eds) Fodder oats: a world overview. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 53–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2002) Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci 42:122–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornic G, Massacci A (1996) Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Baker NR (ed) Photosynthesis and the environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 347–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz J, Avenson T, Kanazawa A, Takizawa K, Edwards G, Kramer D (2004) Plasticity in light reactions of photosynthesis for energy production and photo protection. J Exp Bot 56:395–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FAO http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor

  • Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Develop 29:185–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flexas J, Briantais JM, Cerovic Z, Medrano H, Moya I (2000) Steady-state and maximum chlorophyll fluorescence responses to water stress in grapevine leaves: a new remote sensing system. Remote Sens Environ 73:283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong D-S, Xiong Y-C, Ma B-L, Wang T-M, Ge J-P, Qin X-L, Li P-F, Kong H-Y, Li Z-Z, Li F-M (2010) Early activation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase and its relation to drought adaptation in two contrasting oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Environ Exp Bot 69:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halliwell B (1987) Oxidative damage, lipid-peroxidation and antioxidant protection in chloroplasts. Chem Phys Lipids 44:327–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Z, Liu X, Li X, Xie C, Li M, Zhang D, Zhang S, Xu Y (2009) Identification of quantitative trait loci for drought tolerance at seedling stage by screening a large number of introgression lines in maize. Plant Breed 128:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MR, Xue X, Mao S, Ren C, Eneji AE, Hu Y (2011) Effects of water-saving superabsorbent polymer on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in oat (Avena sativa L.) under drought stress. J Sci Food Agr 91:680–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis RM, Broadhurst D, Johnson H, O’Boyle NM, Goodacre R (2006) PYCHEM: a multivariate analysis package for python. Bioinformatics 22:2565–2566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeger MJ, Viljanen-Rollinson SLH (2001) The use of the area under the disease-progress curve (AUDPC) to assess quantitative disease resistance in crop cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 102:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavar T, Maras M, Kidric M, Sustar-Vozlic J, Meglic V (2008) Identification of genes involved in the response of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris to drought stress. Mol Breeding 21:159–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson KE, Nyström B, Liljenberg C (2006) A phosphatidylserine decarboxylase activity in root cells of oat (Avena sativa) is involved in altering membrane phospholipid composition during drought stress acclimation. Plant Physiol Biochem 44:211–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1994) Statistics in ecology and environmental monitoring. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett 4:27

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin MA, Brown JH, Ferguson H (1989) Leaf water potential, relative water-content, and diffusive resistance as screening techniques for drought resistance in barley. Agron J 81:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medrano H, Escalona JM, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J (2002) Regulation of photosynthesis of C-3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot 89:895–905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merah O (2001) Potential importance of water status traits for durum wheat improvement under Mediterranean conditions. J Agr Sci 137:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Minguez-Mosquera MI, Jaren-Galán M, Garrido-Fernández J (1993) Lipoxygenase activity during pepper ripening and processing of paprika. Phytochemistry 32:1103–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittler R, Blumwald E (2010) Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Annu Revi Plant Biol 61:443–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moinuddin Fischer RA, Sayre KD, Reynolds MP (2005) Osmotic adjustment in wheat in relation to grain yield under water deficit environments. Agron J 97:1062–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JM (1983) Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat. Austr J Agr Res 34:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nageswara-Rao RC, Talwar HS, Wright GC (2001) Rapid assessment of specific leaf area and leaf N in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using chlorophyll meter. J Agron Crop Sci 189:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouk M, Basnayake J, Tsubo M, Fukai S, Fischer KS, Cooper M, Nesbitt H (2006) Use of drought response index for identification of drought tolerant genotypes in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Res 99:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannu RK, Singh DP, Singh P, Chaudhary BD, Singh VP (1993) Evaluation of various plant water indices for screening the genotypes of chickpea under limited water environment. Haryana J Agron 9:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen-Sainio P, Makela P (1995) Comparison of physiological methods to assess drought tolerance in oats. Acta Agr Scand B-S Plant Sci 45:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi L, Polignano GB, De Giovanni C (2001) Genotypic response of faba bean to water stress. Euphytica 118:39–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards RA (1996) Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regul 20:57–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosales MA, Ruiz JM, Hernandez J, Soriano T, Castilla N, Romero L (2006) Antioxidant content and ascorbate metabolism in cherry tomato exocarp in relation to temperature and solar radiation. J Sci Food Agr 86:1545–1551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Martín J, Rubiales D, Prats E (2011) Resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f.sp avenae) in oat seedlings and adult plants. Plant Pathol 60:846–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonfeld MA, Johnson RC, Carver BF, Mornhinweg DW (1988) Water relations in winter-wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci 28:526–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seki M, Umezawa T, Urano K, Shinozaki K (2007) Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:296–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh J, Patel AL (1996) Water status, gas exchange, proline accumulation and yield of wheat in response to water deficit. Ann Biol 12:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Slafer GA, Araus JL (1998) Keynote address: improving wheat responses to abiotic stresses. In: Slinkard AE (ed) Proceedings of the 9th international wheat genetics symposium, vol 1. Saskatchewan, pp 201–213

  • Stevens EJ, Armstrong KW, Bezar HJ, Griffin WB, Hampton JG (2004) Fodder oats an overview. In: Suttie JM, Reynolds SG (eds) Fodder oats: a world overview. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezara W, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SD, Lawlor DW (1999) Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature 401:914–917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy JN, Zhang J, Robin S, Nguyen TT, Nguyen HT (2000) QTLs for cell-membrane stability mapped in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought stress. Theor Appl Genet 100:1197–1202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venuprasad R, Lafitte HR, Atlin GN (2007) Response to direct selection for grain yield under drought stress in rice. Crop Sci 47:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao B, Huang Y, Tang N, Xiong L (2007) Over-expression of a LEA gene in rice improves drought resistance under the field conditions. Theor Appl Genet 115:35–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xin Z, Franks C, Payton P, Burke JJ (2008) A simple method to determine transpiration efficiency in sorghum. Field Crop Res 107:180–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadava UL (1986) A rapid and nondestructive method to determine chlorophyll in intact leaves. HortScience 21:1449–1450

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Sun H, Dai H, Zhang G, Wu F (2010) Difference in response to drought stress among Tibet wild barley genotypes. Euphytica 172:395–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (AGL2010-15936/AGR) and the regional government through the AGR-253 group, the European Regional and Social Development Funds and an FPU fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation to (JSM). We thank CRF (INIA, Madrid) for kindly supplying the seeds of the accessions used. We also thank the technical assistance of B. Espejo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Prats.

Electronic Supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 2468 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sánchez-Martín, J., Mur, L.A.J., Rubiales, D. et al. Targeting sources of drought tolerance within an Avena spp. collection through multivariate approaches. Planta 236, 1529–1545 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1709-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1709-8

Keywords

Navigation