Abstract
In this study, we find and characterize the sources of tolerance to drought amongst an oat (Avena sativa L.) germplasm collection of 174 landraces and cultivars. We used multivariate analysis, non-supervised principal component analyses (PCA) and supervised discriminant function analyses (DFA) to suggest the key mechanism/s responsible for coping with drought stress. Following initial assessment of drought symptoms and area under the drought progress curve, a subset of 14 accessions were selected for further analysis. The collection was assessed for relative water content (RWC), cell membrane stability, stomatal conductance (g 1), leaf temperature, water use efficiency (WUE), lipid peroxidation, lipoxygenase activity, chlorophyll levels and antioxidant capacity during a drought time course experiment. Without the use of multivariate approaches, it proved difficult to unequivocally link drought tolerance to specific physiological processes in the different resistant oat accessions. These approaches allowed the ranking of many supposed drought tolerance traits in the order of degree of importance within this crop, thereby highlighting those with a causal relationship to drought stress tolerance. Analyses of the loading vectors used to derive the PCA and DFA models indicated that two traits involved in water relations, temperature and RWC together with the area of drought curves, were important indicators of drought tolerance. However, other parameters involved in water use such as g 1 and WUE were less able to discriminate between the accessions. These observations validate our approach which should be seen as representing a cost-effective initial screen that could be subsequently employed to target drought tolerance in segregating populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AUCPC:
-
Area under the conductance progress curve
- AUDPC:
-
Area under the drought progress curve
- CMS:
-
Cell membrane stability
- daww:
-
Days after withholding water
- DFA:
-
Discriminant function analysis
- g 1 :
-
Stomatal conductance
- IR:
-
Infrared
- LOX:
-
Lipoxigenase activity
- LP:
-
Lipid peroxidation
- PCA:
-
Principal components analysis
- RWC:
-
Relative water content
- SCMR:
-
SPAD chlorophyll meter reading
- WUE:
-
Water use efficiency
References
Araus JL (1996) Integrative physiological criteria associated with yield potential. In: Reinolds MP, Rajaram S, McNab A (eds) Increasing yield potential in wheat: breaking the barriers. CIMMYT, Mejico, pp 150–167
Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002) Plant breeding and drought in C-3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann Bot 89:925–940
Asada K (1992) Ascorbate peroxidase: a hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzyme in plants. Physiol Plant 85:235–241
Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A re-examination of relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Austr J Biol Sci 15:413–428
Basu S, Roychoudhury A, Saha PP, Sengupta DN (2010) Differential antioxidative responses of indica rice cultivars to drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 60:51–59
Blum A (1999) Towards standard assays of drought resistance in crop plants. In: Ribaut JM, Poland D (eds) Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. A strategic planning workshop held at CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico. CIMMYT, Mexico, pp 29–35
Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Austr J Agric Res 56:1159–1168
Blum A, Ebercon A (1981) Cell-membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 21:43–47
Causton DR (1987) A biologist’s advanced mathematics. Allen and Unwin, London, p 326
Chaouki AF, Chakroun M, Allagui MB, Sbeita A (2004) Fodder oats in the Maghreb. In: Suttie JM, Reynolds SG (eds) Fodder oats: a world overview. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 53–69
Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2002) Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci 42:122–131
Cornic G, Massacci A (1996) Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Baker NR (ed) Photosynthesis and the environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 347–366
Cruz J, Avenson T, Kanazawa A, Takizawa K, Edwards G, Kramer D (2004) Plasticity in light reactions of photosynthesis for energy production and photo protection. J Exp Bot 56:395–406
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Develop 29:185–212
Flexas J, Briantais JM, Cerovic Z, Medrano H, Moya I (2000) Steady-state and maximum chlorophyll fluorescence responses to water stress in grapevine leaves: a new remote sensing system. Remote Sens Environ 73:283–297
Gong D-S, Xiong Y-C, Ma B-L, Wang T-M, Ge J-P, Qin X-L, Li P-F, Kong H-Y, Li Z-Z, Li F-M (2010) Early activation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase and its relation to drought adaptation in two contrasting oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Environ Exp Bot 69:1–8
Halliwell B (1987) Oxidative damage, lipid-peroxidation and antioxidant protection in chloroplasts. Chem Phys Lipids 44:327–340
Hao Z, Liu X, Li X, Xie C, Li M, Zhang D, Zhang S, Xu Y (2009) Identification of quantitative trait loci for drought tolerance at seedling stage by screening a large number of introgression lines in maize. Plant Breed 128:337–341
Islam MR, Xue X, Mao S, Ren C, Eneji AE, Hu Y (2011) Effects of water-saving superabsorbent polymer on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in oat (Avena sativa L.) under drought stress. J Sci Food Agr 91:680–686
Jarvis RM, Broadhurst D, Johnson H, O’Boyle NM, Goodacre R (2006) PYCHEM: a multivariate analysis package for python. Bioinformatics 22:2565–2566
Jeger MJ, Viljanen-Rollinson SLH (2001) The use of the area under the disease-progress curve (AUDPC) to assess quantitative disease resistance in crop cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 102:32–40
Kavar T, Maras M, Kidric M, Sustar-Vozlic J, Meglic V (2008) Identification of genes involved in the response of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris to drought stress. Mol Breeding 21:159–172
Larsson KE, Nyström B, Liljenberg C (2006) A phosphatidylserine decarboxylase activity in root cells of oat (Avena sativa) is involved in altering membrane phospholipid composition during drought stress acclimation. Plant Physiol Biochem 44:211–219
Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Academic Press, New York
Manly BFJ (1994) Statistics in ecology and environmental monitoring. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett 4:27
Matin MA, Brown JH, Ferguson H (1989) Leaf water potential, relative water-content, and diffusive resistance as screening techniques for drought resistance in barley. Agron J 81:100–105
Medrano H, Escalona JM, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J (2002) Regulation of photosynthesis of C-3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot 89:895–905
Merah O (2001) Potential importance of water status traits for durum wheat improvement under Mediterranean conditions. J Agr Sci 137:139–145
Minguez-Mosquera MI, Jaren-Galán M, Garrido-Fernández J (1993) Lipoxygenase activity during pepper ripening and processing of paprika. Phytochemistry 32:1103–1108
Mittler R, Blumwald E (2010) Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Annu Revi Plant Biol 61:443–462
Moinuddin Fischer RA, Sayre KD, Reynolds MP (2005) Osmotic adjustment in wheat in relation to grain yield under water deficit environments. Agron J 97:1062–1071
Morgan JM (1983) Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat. Austr J Agr Res 34:607–614
Nageswara-Rao RC, Talwar HS, Wright GC (2001) Rapid assessment of specific leaf area and leaf N in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using chlorophyll meter. J Agron Crop Sci 189:175–182
Ouk M, Basnayake J, Tsubo M, Fukai S, Fischer KS, Cooper M, Nesbitt H (2006) Use of drought response index for identification of drought tolerant genotypes in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Res 99:48–58
Pannu RK, Singh DP, Singh P, Chaudhary BD, Singh VP (1993) Evaluation of various plant water indices for screening the genotypes of chickpea under limited water environment. Haryana J Agron 9:16–22
Peltonen-Sainio P, Makela P (1995) Comparison of physiological methods to assess drought tolerance in oats. Acta Agr Scand B-S Plant Sci 45:32–38
Ricciardi L, Polignano GB, De Giovanni C (2001) Genotypic response of faba bean to water stress. Euphytica 118:39–46
Richards RA (1996) Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regul 20:57–166
Rosales MA, Ruiz JM, Hernandez J, Soriano T, Castilla N, Romero L (2006) Antioxidant content and ascorbate metabolism in cherry tomato exocarp in relation to temperature and solar radiation. J Sci Food Agr 86:1545–1551
Sánchez-Martín J, Rubiales D, Prats E (2011) Resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f.sp avenae) in oat seedlings and adult plants. Plant Pathol 60:846–856
Schonfeld MA, Johnson RC, Carver BF, Mornhinweg DW (1988) Water relations in winter-wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci 28:526–531
Seki M, Umezawa T, Urano K, Shinozaki K (2007) Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:296–302
Singh J, Patel AL (1996) Water status, gas exchange, proline accumulation and yield of wheat in response to water deficit. Ann Biol 12:77–81
Slafer GA, Araus JL (1998) Keynote address: improving wheat responses to abiotic stresses. In: Slinkard AE (ed) Proceedings of the 9th international wheat genetics symposium, vol 1. Saskatchewan, pp 201–213
Stevens EJ, Armstrong KW, Bezar HJ, Griffin WB, Hampton JG (2004) Fodder oats an overview. In: Suttie JM, Reynolds SG (eds) Fodder oats: a world overview. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 1–9
Tezara W, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SD, Lawlor DW (1999) Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature 401:914–917
Tripathy JN, Zhang J, Robin S, Nguyen TT, Nguyen HT (2000) QTLs for cell-membrane stability mapped in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought stress. Theor Appl Genet 100:1197–1202
Venuprasad R, Lafitte HR, Atlin GN (2007) Response to direct selection for grain yield under drought stress in rice. Crop Sci 47:285–293
Xiao B, Huang Y, Tang N, Xiong L (2007) Over-expression of a LEA gene in rice improves drought resistance under the field conditions. Theor Appl Genet 115:35–46
Xin Z, Franks C, Payton P, Burke JJ (2008) A simple method to determine transpiration efficiency in sorghum. Field Crop Res 107:180–183
Yadava UL (1986) A rapid and nondestructive method to determine chlorophyll in intact leaves. HortScience 21:1449–1450
Zhao J, Sun H, Dai H, Zhang G, Wu F (2010) Difference in response to drought stress among Tibet wild barley genotypes. Euphytica 172:395–403
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (AGL2010-15936/AGR) and the regional government through the AGR-253 group, the European Regional and Social Development Funds and an FPU fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation to (JSM). We thank CRF (INIA, Madrid) for kindly supplying the seeds of the accessions used. We also thank the technical assistance of B. Espejo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sánchez-Martín, J., Mur, L.A.J., Rubiales, D. et al. Targeting sources of drought tolerance within an Avena spp. collection through multivariate approaches. Planta 236, 1529–1545 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1709-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1709-8